From e769ece3b129698d2b09811a6f6d304e4eaa8c29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:04:01 +0200 Subject: KVM: s390: fix pfmf non-quiescing control handling Fix the test within handle_pfmf() if the host has the NQ key-setting facility installed. Right now the code would incorrectly generate a program check in the guest if the NQ control bit for a pfmf request was set and if the host has the NQ key-setting facility installed. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index 0da3e6eb6be6..4cdc54e63ebc 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -532,8 +533,7 @@ static int handle_pfmf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); /* Only provide non-quiescing support if the host supports it */ - if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && - S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list & 0x00020000) + if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && !test_facility(14)) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); /* No support for conditional-SSKE */ -- cgit v1.2.3