From b1f44e13a525d2ffb7d5afe2273b7169d6f2222e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:05:22 -0800 Subject: sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation. The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore' but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich --- arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c b/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c index 5175ac2f4820..8a7f81743c12 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c @@ -302,8 +302,7 @@ void __init btfixup(void) case 'i': /* INT */ if ((insn & 0xc1c00000) == 0x01000000) /* %HI */ set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffc00000) | (p[1] >> 10)); - else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000 && - (insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000) /* %LO */ + else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000) /* %LO */ set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffffe000) | (p[1] & 0x3ff)); else { prom_printf(insn_i, p, addr, insn); -- cgit v1.2.3