From 636802ef96eebe279b22ad9f9dacfe29291e45c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:08:28 +0000 Subject: powerpc: Don't use __put_user() in patch_instruction patch_instruction() can be called very early on ppc32, when the kernel isn't yet running at it's linked address. That can cause the ! is_kernel_addr() test in __put_user() to trip and call might_sleep() which is very bad at that point during boot. Use a lower level function instead for now, at least until we get to rework ppc32 boot process to do the code patching later, like ppc64 does. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt --- arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index dd223b3eb333..17e5b2364312 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int instr) { int err; - err = __put_user(instr, addr); + __put_user_size(instr, addr, 4, err); if (err) return err; asm ("dcbst 0, %0; sync; icbi 0,%0; sync; isync" : : "r" (addr)); -- cgit v1.2.3