From 5f0c71278d6848b4809f83af90f28196e1505ab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:09:50 +0100 Subject: x86/fpu: Simplify fpregs_[un]lock() There is no point in disabling preemption and then disabling bottom halfs. Just disabling bottom halfs is sufficient as it implicitly disables preemption on !RT kernels. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027101349.455380473@linutronix.de --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm/fpu') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h index dcd9503b1098..2c5bef78a484 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h @@ -29,17 +29,18 @@ extern void fpregs_mark_activate(void); * A context switch will (and softirq might) save CPU's FPU registers to * fpu->state and set TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD leaving CPU's FPU registers in * a random state. + * + * local_bh_disable() protects against both preemption and soft interrupts + * on !RT kernels. */ static inline void fpregs_lock(void) { - preempt_disable(); local_bh_disable(); } static inline void fpregs_unlock(void) { local_bh_enable(); - preempt_enable(); } #ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU -- cgit v1.2.3