From 9a6b55ac4a44060bcb782baf002859b2a2c63267 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:52:38 +0100 Subject: lib/vdso: Make __arch_update_vdso_data() logic understandable The function name suggests that this is a boolean checking whether the architecture asks for an update of the VDSO data, but it works the other way round. To spare further confusion invert the logic. Fixes: 44f57d788e7d ("timekeeping: Provide a generic update_vsyscall() implementation") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200114185946.656652824@linutronix.de --- arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/vsyscall.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm') diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/vsyscall.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/vsyscall.h index c4166f317071..cff87d8d30da 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/vsyscall.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/vsyscall.h @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ struct vdso_data *__arm_get_k_vdso_data(void) #define __arch_get_k_vdso_data __arm_get_k_vdso_data static __always_inline -int __arm_update_vdso_data(void) +bool __arm_update_vdso_data(void) { - return !cntvct_ok; + return cntvct_ok; } #define __arch_update_vdso_data __arm_update_vdso_data -- cgit v1.2.3