From 2969c03763b40e946b46aee57ef083527711c69f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:24:43 -0400 Subject: ARM: dts: exynos: Fix port nodes names for Exynos5250 Snow board Commit 5c9cbade0629 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Exynos5250") fixed all the DTC warnings about mismatchs between unit names and reg properties in Exynos5250 boards DTS. But unfortunately it also added a regression on the Exynos5250 Snow Chromebook when changing the port node names since the OF graph logic expects the port nodes to be always named 'port'. The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt binding document says that when there is more than one port, '#address-cells', '#size-cells' and 'reg' properties should be used to number the port nodes. Fixes: 5c9cbade0629 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Exynos5250") Reported-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Tested-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi index ddfe1f558c10..fa14f77df563 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ hpd-gpios = <&gpx0 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; ports { - port0 { + port { dp_out: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>; }; @@ -485,13 +485,20 @@ edid-emulation = <5>; ports { - port0 { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + bridge_out: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>; }; }; - port1 { + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + bridge_in: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>; }; -- cgit v1.2.3 From a7d7865fecd83adb98b20eca5eddef7efc94831d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:24:44 -0400 Subject: ARM: dts: exynos: Fix port nodes names for Exynos5420 Peach Pit board Commit bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Peach Pit") fixed the DTC warnings about mismatches between unit names and reg properties in the Exynos5420 Peach Pit DTS. But unfortunately it also added a regression on the Peach Pit when changing the port node names since the OF graph logic expects the port nodes to be always named 'port'. The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt binding document says that when there is more than one port, '#address-cells', '#size-cells' and 'reg' properties should be used to number the port nodes. Fixes: bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Peach Pit") Reported-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts index f9d2e4f1a0e0..1de972d46a87 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ hpd-gpios = <&gpx2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; ports { - port0 { + port { dp_out: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>; }; @@ -631,13 +631,20 @@ use-external-pwm; ports { - port0 { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + bridge_out: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>; }; }; - port1 { + port@1 { + reg = <1>; + bridge_in: endpoint { remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>; }; -- cgit v1.2.3