From 6db4263fec9e550e0cdaed732f4af77a44c10f5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:52:39 +0200 Subject: KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c Instead of having huge jump tables for function selection, let's use normal switch/case statements for the instruction handlers in priv.c This allows the compiler to make the right decision depending on the situation (e.g. avoid jump-tables for thunks). Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index c4c4e157c036..a74578cdd3f3 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -795,55 +795,60 @@ out: return rc; } -static const intercept_handler_t b2_handlers[256] = { - [0x02] = handle_stidp, - [0x04] = handle_set_clock, - [0x10] = handle_set_prefix, - [0x11] = handle_store_prefix, - [0x12] = handle_store_cpu_address, - [0x14] = kvm_s390_handle_vsie, - [0x21] = handle_ipte_interlock, - [0x29] = handle_iske, - [0x2a] = handle_rrbe, - [0x2b] = handle_sske, - [0x2c] = handle_test_block, - [0x30] = handle_io_inst, - [0x31] = handle_io_inst, - [0x32] = handle_io_inst, - [0x33] = handle_io_inst, - [0x34] = handle_io_inst, - [0x35] = handle_io_inst, - [0x36] = handle_io_inst, - [0x37] = handle_io_inst, - [0x38] = handle_io_inst, - [0x39] = handle_io_inst, - [0x3a] = handle_io_inst, - [0x3b] = handle_io_inst, - [0x3c] = handle_io_inst, - [0x50] = handle_ipte_interlock, - [0x56] = handle_sthyi, - [0x5f] = handle_io_inst, - [0x74] = handle_io_inst, - [0x76] = handle_io_inst, - [0x7d] = handle_stsi, - [0xb1] = handle_stfl, - [0xb2] = handle_lpswe, -}; - int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - intercept_handler_t handler; - - /* - * A lot of B2 instructions are priviledged. Here we check for - * the privileged ones, that we can handle in the kernel. - * Anything else goes to userspace. - */ - handler = b2_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff]; - if (handler) - return handler(vcpu); - - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff) { + case 0x02: + return handle_stidp(vcpu); + case 0x04: + return handle_set_clock(vcpu); + case 0x10: + return handle_set_prefix(vcpu); + case 0x11: + return handle_store_prefix(vcpu); + case 0x12: + return handle_store_cpu_address(vcpu); + case 0x14: + return kvm_s390_handle_vsie(vcpu); + case 0x21: + case 0x50: + return handle_ipte_interlock(vcpu); + case 0x29: + return handle_iske(vcpu); + case 0x2a: + return handle_rrbe(vcpu); + case 0x2b: + return handle_sske(vcpu); + case 0x2c: + return handle_test_block(vcpu); + case 0x30: + case 0x31: + case 0x32: + case 0x33: + case 0x34: + case 0x35: + case 0x36: + case 0x37: + case 0x38: + case 0x39: + case 0x3a: + case 0x3b: + case 0x3c: + case 0x5f: + case 0x74: + case 0x76: + return handle_io_inst(vcpu); + case 0x56: + return handle_sthyi(vcpu); + case 0x7d: + return handle_stsi(vcpu); + case 0xb1: + return handle_stfl(vcpu); + case 0xb2: + return handle_lpswe(vcpu); + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } static int handle_epsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -1105,25 +1110,22 @@ static int handle_essa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } -static const intercept_handler_t b9_handlers[256] = { - [0x8a] = handle_ipte_interlock, - [0x8d] = handle_epsw, - [0x8e] = handle_ipte_interlock, - [0x8f] = handle_ipte_interlock, - [0xab] = handle_essa, - [0xaf] = handle_pfmf, -}; - int kvm_s390_handle_b9(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - intercept_handler_t handler; - - /* This is handled just as for the B2 instructions. */ - handler = b9_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff]; - if (handler) - return handler(vcpu); - - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff) { + case 0x8a: + case 0x8e: + case 0x8f: + return handle_ipte_interlock(vcpu); + case 0x8d: + return handle_epsw(vcpu); + case 0xab: + return handle_essa(vcpu); + case 0xaf: + return handle_pfmf(vcpu); + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -1271,22 +1273,20 @@ static int handle_stctg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return rc ? kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc) : 0; } -static const intercept_handler_t eb_handlers[256] = { - [0x2f] = handle_lctlg, - [0x25] = handle_stctg, - [0x60] = handle_ri, - [0x61] = handle_ri, - [0x62] = handle_ri, -}; - int kvm_s390_handle_eb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - intercept_handler_t handler; - - handler = eb_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff]; - if (handler) - return handler(vcpu); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x000000ff) { + case 0x25: + return handle_stctg(vcpu); + case 0x2f: + return handle_lctlg(vcpu); + case 0x60: + case 0x61: + case 0x62: + return handle_ri(vcpu); + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } static int handle_tprot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -1346,10 +1346,12 @@ out_unlock: int kvm_s390_handle_e5(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - /* For e5xx... instructions we only handle TPROT */ - if ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff) == 0x01) + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff) { + case 0x01: return handle_tprot(vcpu); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } static int handle_sckpf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -1380,17 +1382,14 @@ static int handle_ptff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } -static const intercept_handler_t x01_handlers[256] = { - [0x04] = handle_ptff, - [0x07] = handle_sckpf, -}; - int kvm_s390_handle_01(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - intercept_handler_t handler; - - handler = x01_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff]; - if (handler) - return handler(vcpu); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x00ff) { + case 0x04: + return handle_ptff(vcpu); + case 0x07: + return handle_sckpf(vcpu); + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } -- cgit v1.2.3