From 21e8860ef467001330368eceeb855fde46ab1dec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20Winiarski?= Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:00:09 +0200 Subject: drm/i915/guc: Do not use 0 for GuC doorbell cookie MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Apparently, this value is reserved and may be interpreted as changing doorbell ownership. Even though we're not observing any side effects now, let's skip over it to be consistent with the spec. v2: Apply checkpatch (Sagar) Suggested-by: Sagar Arun Kamble Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171025200020.16636-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c index 07289a4b5bfa..0b61bf18c3f4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c @@ -475,9 +475,12 @@ static void guc_ring_doorbell(struct i915_guc_client *client) /* pointer of current doorbell cacheline */ db = __get_doorbell(client); - /* we're not expecting the doorbell cookie to change behind our back */ + /* + * We're not expecting the doorbell cookie to change behind our back, + * we also need to treat 0 as a reserved value. + */ cookie = READ_ONCE(db->cookie); - WARN_ON_ONCE(xchg(&db->cookie, cookie + 1) != cookie); + WARN_ON_ONCE(xchg(&db->cookie, cookie + 1 ?: cookie + 2) != cookie); /* XXX: doorbell was lost and need to acquire it again */ GEM_BUG_ON(db->db_status != GUC_DOORBELL_ENABLED); -- cgit v1.2.3