summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-03-14selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Add test cases for POPFAndy Lutomirski
POPF is currently broken -- add tests to catch the error. This results in: [RUN] POPF with VIP set and IF clear from vm86 mode [INFO] Exited vm86 mode due to STI [FAIL] Incorrect return reason (started at eip = 0xd, ended at eip = 0xf) because POPF currently fails to check IF before reporting a pending interrupt. This patch also makes the FAIL message a bit more informative. Reported-by: Bart Oldeman <bartoldeman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a16270b5cfe7832d6d00c479d0f871066cbdb52b.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-14selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Exit with 1 if we failAndy Lutomirski
Fix a logic error that caused the test to exit with 0 even if test cases failed. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bartoldeman@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b1cc37144038958a469c8f70a5f47a6a5638636a.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-08selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructionsRicardo Neri
The STR and SLDT instructions are not valid when running on virtual-8086 mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two instructions are protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these instructions generate a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0. Linux traps the general protection fault and emulates the instructions sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not str and sldt. These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is seen. Tests fallback to exit with INT3 in case emulation does happen. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-08selftests/x86: Add tests for User-Mode Instruction PreventionRicardo Neri
Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3. The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases: a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-10-31selftests/x86: Add a fork() to entry_from_vm86 to catch fork bugsAndy Lutomirski
Mere possession of vm86 state is strange. Make sure that nothing gets corrupted if we fork after calling vm86(). Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/08f83295460a80e41dc5e3e81ec40d6844d316f5.1446270067.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-09-05x86/vm86: Block non-root vm86(old) if mmap_min_addr != 0Andy Lutomirski
vm86 exposes an interesting attack surface against the entry code. Since vm86 is mostly useless anyway if mmap_min_addr != 0, just turn it off in that case. There are some reports that vbetool can work despite setting mmap_min_addr to zero. This shouldn't break that use case, as CAP_SYS_RAWIO already overrides mmap_min_addr. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-31selftests/x86/vm86: Fix entry_from_vm86 test on 64-bit kernelsAndy Lutomirski
The test failed due to an oversight on my part when run on a 64-bit kernel. vm86 isn't expected to work at all, and I mistakenly failed one part of the test because no signal was delivered. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/502c8bef877b33fe4943885ded6125dfcc7892db.1438205722.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-21x86/selftests, x86/vm86: Improve entry_from_vm86 selftestAndy Lutomirski
The entry_from_vm86 selftest was very weak. Improve it: test more types of kernel entries from vm86 mode and test them more carefully. While we're at it, try to improve behavior on non-SEP CPUs. The old code was buggy because I misunderstood the intended semantics of #UD in vm86, so I didn't handle a possible signal. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d8ef1d7368ac70d8342481563ed50f9a7d2eea6f.1436492057.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-30x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add a selftest for kernel entries from VM86 modeAndy Lutomirski
Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and 4.1-rc5 due to a regression I introduced, and it should make sure that the SYSENTER-from-vm86-mode hack in the kernel keeps working. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/09a9916761e0a9e42d4922f147af45a0079cc1e8.1432936374.git.luto@kernel.org Tests: 394838c96013 x86/asm/entry/32: Fix user_mode() misuses Tests: 7ba554b5ac69 x86/asm/entry/32: Really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>