summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: amtel: mikroe-proto: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: consider CPU-Platform possibility unnecessary ↵Kuninori Morimoto
Platform" commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbeColin Ian King
Currently when a kstrdup fails the error exit paths don't free the allocations for sm, se and sbe. This can be fixed by assigning kc[i].private_value to these before doing the ksrtdup so that the error exit path will be able to free these objects. Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") Fixes: 9f90af3a9952 ("ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()Kuninori Morimoto
We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register, let's use it. This patch also removes related empty functions Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codecJerome Brunet
While checking cpus before dereferencing the pointer is required, it is not necessary for codecs. 'codec' can't possibly be NULL in the loop Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1Jerome Brunet
Add support platforms_num != 1 in dai_link. Initially, the main purpose of this change was to make the platform optional in the dai_link, instead of inserting the dummy platform driver. This particular case had just been solved by Kuninori Morimoto with commit 1d7689892878 ("ASoC: soc-core: allow no Platform on dai_link"). However, this change may still be useful for those who need multiple platform components on a single dai_link (it solves one of the FIXME note in soc-core) Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: soc-core: defer card registration if codec component is missingJerome Brunet
Like cpus and platforms, defer sound card initialization if the codec component is missing when initializing the dai_link Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Reset used registers at probeCodrin Ciubotariu
Since the ad193x codecs have no software reset, we have to reinitialize the registers after a hardware reset to assure no previous values are kept. Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Group register initialization at probeCodrin Ciubotariu
Create a structure with the register initialization values at probe and use it to initialize all the registers at once. Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ALSA: seq: fix incorrect order of dest_client/dest_ports argumentsColin Ian King
There are two occurrances of a call to snd_seq_oss_fill_addr where the dest_client and dest_port arguments are in the wrong order. Fix this by swapping them around. Addresses-Coverity: ("Arguments in wrong order") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-28ALSA: hda/realtek - Change front mic location for Lenovo M710qDennis Wassenberg
On M710q Lenovo ThinkCentre machine, there are two front mics, we change the location for one of them to avoid conflicts. Signed-off-by: Dennis Wassenberg <dennis.wassenberg@secunet.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-28ALSA: firewire-lib: fix to process MIDI conformant data channel for AM824 formatTakashi Sakamoto
In IEC 61883-6, 8 MIDI data streams are multiplexed into single MIDI conformant data channel. The index of stream is calculated by modulo 8 of the value of data block counter. Therefore data block processing layer requires valid value of data block counter. In recent changes of ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine, the value of data block counter is changed before calling data block processing layer. This brings miss detection of MIDI messages in non-blocking transmission method is used. This commit fixes the bug by changing chached data block counter after calling data block processing layer. Fixes: e335425b6596 ("ALSA: firewire-lib: split helper function to check incoming CIP header") Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-28ALSA: firewire-lib: cache next data_block_counter after probing tracepoints ↵Takashi Sakamoto
event for IR context For debugging purpose, ALSA IEC 61883-1/6 engine has tracepoints event. In current implementation, next data block counter is stored as current data block counter before probing the event for IR isoc context. It's not good to check current packet parameter. This commit changes to assign the next data block counter after probing the event. Besides, Fireworks devices has a quirk to transfer isoc packet with data block counter for the last data block. For this quirk, the assignment is done before calling data block processing layer. Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-28ALSA: xen-front: fix unintention integer overflow on left shiftsColin Ian King
Shifting the integer value 1 is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects a 64-bit value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this by using the BIT_ULL macro to perform the shift. [ Note: as of the time being, no actual integer overflow hits because all values are less than 32bit, not including the extended 3-byte or DSD formats. But this is the right fix for future usage, of course. -- tiwai ] Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-28ALSA: usb-audio: fix sign unintended sign extension on left shiftsColin Ian King
There are a couple of left shifts of unsigned 8 bit values that first get promoted to signed ints and hence get sign extended on the shift if the top bit of the 8 bit values are set. Fix this by casting the 8 bit values to unsigned ints to stop the unintentional sign extension. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintended sign extension") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-06-26Merge tag 'v5.2-rc6' into asoc-5.3Mark Brown
Linux 5.2-rc6
2019-06-26ASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()Kuninori Morimoto
commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()") used soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(), but, some CPU driver has CPU component for DAI and Platform component, for example generic DMAEngine component. In such case, CPU component and Platform component have same of_node / name. Here soc_find_component() returns *1st* found component. Thus, we shouldn't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(). This patch fixup this it, and add comment to indicate this limitation. Fixes: commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()") Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-26ASoC: rsnd: add missing pin sharing with SSI9Kuninori Morimoto
When SSI9 is sharing pin with SSI0, we need to care about it, but is missing. This patch fixup it. Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-26ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: tidyup SSI_MODE1/2 settingsKuninori Morimoto
R-Car Sound can use pin sharing and multi-SSI for SSI0/1/2/3/4/9. Because complex HW settings and spaghetti code, the settings for SSI9 pin sharing with SSI0 doesn't work. This patch tidyup settings for it. Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-26ASoC: madera: Update SPDX headersCharles Keepax
The madera driver was merged too late to catch Thomas Gleixner's cleanup of the SPDX headers tree wide. Update the headers to match what was done in that patch. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-26ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Fix memory corruption on BE 64b systemsCodrin Ciubotariu
Since change_bit() requires unsigned long*, making this cast on an unsigned int variable will change a wrong bit on BE platforms, causing memory corruption. Replace this function with a simple XOR. Fixes: 90f6e6803139 ("ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Fix frame polarity for DSP_A format") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Strip T and L from TLV IPCsKamil Lulko
cAVS modules do not require Type and Length header within the set_module_params IPC. This is also true for Vendor modules. The userspace (like tinymix) always appends this header to TLV controls which are used for set_module_params. Simply assume this header is always present in the payload and omit it from the IPC. Signed-off-by: Kamil Lulko <kamilx.lulko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Reset pipeline before its deletionAmadeusz Sławiński
Before actual deletion, pipeline should enter RESET state. Currently, pipe skips this checkpoint and goes straight to the finish line. This is not the expected path by the FW, so correct it. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Common: Fix NULL dereference in tx_wait_doneCezary Rojewski
rx_data and rx_bytes present for tx_wait_done are optional parameters. If not provided, function should not attempt to copy received data. This change fixes memcpy NULL pointer dereference issue occurring when optional rx_data is NULL while received message size is non-zero. Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Fix race condition in IPC rx listGustaw Lewandowski
Since there are multiple IPCs being sent in a short span of time, there is a possibility of more than one message being on the Rx list after receiving response from firmware. In such cases, when the first notification of interrupt from firmware is received, driver retrieves the message from the Rx list but does not delete it from the list till the next lock. In the meantime, when another interrupt is received from the firmware, driver is reading the previous message again since the previous message has not been removed from the list. Signed-off-by: Gustaw Lewandowski <gustaw.lewandowski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Read HIPCT extension before clearing DONE bitCezary Rojewski
Host clears DONE bit to signal IPC target it has completed the operation. Once this is done, IPC target i.e. DSP may proceed with the next reply, filling registers with new portion of data. Because of this, host should always read all registers prior to clearing DONE and BUSY bits to ensure no desynchronization happens the time in between clearing bits and reading message data (here, extension). Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flowAmadeusz Sławiński
There are a few soc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create functions with similar content, but slightly different flow, unify their flow and make sure that we go to error handler and free memory in case of failure. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: topology: Consolidate how dtexts and dvalues are freedAmadeusz Sławiński
Provide helper functions and use them to free dtexts and dvalues in topology. This is followup cleanup after related changes in this area as suggested in: https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-January/144761.html Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-25ASoC: Intel: hdac_hdmi: Set ops to NULL on removeAmadeusz Sławiński
When we unload Skylake driver we may end up calling hdac_component_master_unbind(), it uses acomp->audio_ops, which we set in hdmi_codec_probe(), so we need to set it to NULL in hdmi_codec_remove(), otherwise we will dereference no longer existing pointer. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>