| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor
Pull apparmor updates from John Johansen:
"No features this time, just minor cleanups and bug fixes.
Cleanups:
- fix spelling mistake: "resoure" -> "resource"
- remove unused redundant variable stop
- Fix bool initialization/comparison
Bug Fixes:
- initialized returned struct aa_perms
- fix leak of null profile name if profile allocation fails
- ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail
- fix profile attachment for special unconfined profiles
- fix locking when creating a new complain profile.
- fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns"
* tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-11-21' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor:
apparmor: fix possible recursive lock warning in __aa_create_ns
apparmor: fix locking when creating a new complain profile.
apparmor: fix profile attachment for special unconfined profiles
apparmor: ensure that undecidable profile attachments fail
apparmor: fix leak of null profile name if profile allocation fails
apparmor: remove unused redundant variable stop
apparmor: Fix bool initialization/comparison
apparmor: initialized returned struct aa_perms
apparmor: fix spelling mistake: "resoure" -> "resource"
|
|
Use mutex_lock_nested to provide lockdep the parent child lock ordering of
the tree.
This fixes the lockdep Warning
[ 305.275177] ============================================
[ 305.275178] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 305.275179] 4.14.0-rc7+ #320 Not tainted
[ 305.275180] --------------------------------------------
[ 305.275181] apparmor_parser/1339 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 305.275182] (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff970544dd>] __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275187]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 305.275187] (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff97054b5d>] aa_prepare_ns+0x3d/0xd0
[ 305.275190]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 305.275191] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 305.275192] CPU0
[ 305.275193] ----
[ 305.275193] lock(&ns->lock);
[ 305.275194] lock(&ns->lock);
[ 305.275195]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 305.275196] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 305.275198] 2 locks held by apparmor_parser/1339:
[ 305.275198] #0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff96e9c6b7>] vfs_write+0x1a7/0x1d0
[ 305.275202] #1: (&ns->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff97054b5d>] aa_prepare_ns+0x3d/0xd0
[ 305.275205]
stack backtrace:
[ 305.275207] CPU: 1 PID: 1339 Comm: apparmor_parser Not tainted 4.14.0-rc7+ #320
[ 305.275208] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 305.275209] Call Trace:
[ 305.275212] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb
[ 305.275214] __lock_acquire+0x141c/0x1460
[ 305.275216] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275218] ? ___slab_alloc+0x183/0x540
[ 305.275219] ? ___slab_alloc+0x183/0x540
[ 305.275221] lock_acquire+0xed/0x1e0
[ 305.275223] ? lock_acquire+0xed/0x1e0
[ 305.275224] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275227] __mutex_lock+0x89/0x920
[ 305.275228] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275230] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11f/0x190
[ 305.275231] ? __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275233] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x57/0x1d0
[ 305.275234] ? lockdep_init_map+0x9/0x10
[ 305.275236] ? __rwlock_init+0x32/0x60
[ 305.275238] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 305.275240] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 305.275241] __aa_create_ns+0x6d/0x1e0
[ 305.275243] aa_prepare_ns+0xc2/0xd0
[ 305.275245] aa_replace_profiles+0x168/0xf30
[ 305.275247] ? __might_fault+0x85/0x90
[ 305.275250] policy_update+0xb9/0x380
[ 305.275252] profile_load+0x7e/0x90
[ 305.275254] __vfs_write+0x28/0x150
[ 305.275256] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x72/0x80
[ 305.275257] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2f/0x60
[ 305.275259] ? __sb_start_write+0xdc/0x1c0
[ 305.275261] ? vfs_write+0x1a7/0x1d0
[ 305.275262] vfs_write+0xca/0x1d0
[ 305.275264] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x11f/0x190
[ 305.275266] SyS_write+0x49/0xa0
[ 305.275268] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
[ 305.275271] RIP: 0033:0x7fa6b22e8c74
[ 305.275272] RSP: 002b:00007ffeaaee6288 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 305.275273] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffeaaee62a4 RCX: 00007fa6b22e8c74
[ 305.275274] RDX: 0000000000000a51 RSI: 00005566a8198c10 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 305.275275] RBP: 0000000000000a39 R08: 0000000000000a51 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 305.275276] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005566a8198c10
[ 305.275277] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00005566a72ecb88 R15: 00005566a72ec3a8
Fixes: 73688d1ed0b8 ("apparmor: refactor prepare_ns() and make usable from different views")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
with lockdep
The lockdep subsystem provides a robust way to assert that a lock is
held, so use that instead of write_can_lock, which can give incorrect
results for qrwlocks.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
sparse reports
poisoning the proxy->label before freeing the struct is resulting in
a sparse build warning.
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: expected struct aa_label [noderef] <asn:4>*label
../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: got struct aa_label *<noident>
fix with RCU_INIT_POINTER as this is one of those cases where
rcu_assign_pointer() is not needed.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
With apparmor policy virtualization based on policy namespace View's
we don't generally want/need absolute root based views, however there
are cases like debugging and some secid based conversions where
using a root based view is important.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
|
|
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
Begin moving apparmor to using broader domain labels, that will allow
run time computation of domain type splitting via "stacking" of
profiles into a domain label vec.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
