summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/kernel-doc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-04-27kernel-doc: Add support for __deprecatedMatthew Wilcox
The current linux-next tree has a new error: ./Documentation/gpu/drm-mm:445: ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:994: WARNING: Error in declarator or parameters Invalid C declaration: Expecting "(" in parameters. [error at 17] int __deprecated drm_prime_sg_to_page_array (struct sg_table *sgt, struct page **pages, int max_entries) -----------------^ While we might consider that documenting a deprecated interface is not necessarily best practice, removing the error is easy. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210427114828.GY235567@casper.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-04-15scripts: kernel-doc: improve parsing for kernel-doc comments syntaxAditya Srivastava
Currently kernel-doc does not identify some cases of probable kernel doc comments, for e.g. pointer used as declaration type for identifier, space separated identifier, etc. Some example of these cases in files can be: i)" * journal_t * jbd2_journal_init_dev() - creates and initialises a journal structure" in fs/jbd2/journal.c ii) "* dget, dget_dlock - get a reference to a dentry" in include/linux/dcache.h iii) " * DEFINE_SEQLOCK(sl) - Define a statically allocated seqlock_t" in include/linux/seqlock.h Also improve identification for non-kerneldoc comments. For e.g., i) " * The following functions allow us to read data using a swap map" in kernel/power/swap.c does follow the kernel-doc like syntax, but the content inside does not adheres to the expected format. Improve parsing by adding support for these probable attempts to write kernel-doc comment. Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87mtujktl2.fsf@meer.lwn.net Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414192529.9080-1-yashsri421@gmail.com [ jc: fixed some line-length issues ] Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-29scripts: kernel-doc: add warning for comment not following kernel-doc syntaxAditya Srivastava
Currently, kernel-doc start parsing the comment as a kernel-doc comment if it starts with '/**', but does not take into account if the content inside the comment too, adheres with the expected format. This results in unexpected and unclear warnings for the user. E.g., running scripts/kernel-doc -none mm/memcontrol.c emits: "mm/memcontrol.c:961: warning: expecting prototype for do not fallback to current(). Prototype was for get_mem_cgroup_from_current() instead" Here kernel-doc parses the corresponding comment as a kernel-doc comment and expects prototype for it in the next lines, and as a result causing this warning. Provide a clearer warning message to the users regarding the same, if the content inside the comment does not follow the kernel-doc expected format. Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210329092945.13152-1-yashsri421@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-26docs: kernel-doc: properly recognize parameter lines with colonsJonathan Corbet
The previous attempt to properly handle literal blocks broke parsing of parameter lines containing colons; fix it by tweaking the regex to specifically exclude the "::" pattern while accepting lines containing colons in general. Add a little documentation to the regex while in the neighborhood. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Fixes: 8d295fbad687 ("kernel-doc: better handle '::' sequences") Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-25kernel-doc: better handle '::' sequencesMauro Carvalho Chehab
Right now, if one of the following headers end with a '::', the kernel-doc script will do the wrong thing: description|context|returns?|notes?|examples? The real issue is with examples, as people could try to write something like: example:: /* Some C code */ and this won't be properly evaluated. So, improve the regex to not catch '\w+::' regex for the above identifiers. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cf44cf1fa42588632735d4fbc8e84304bdc235f.1616696051.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-08scripts/kernel-doc: ignore identifier on anonymous enumsMauro Carvalho Chehab
When anonymous enums are used, the identifier is empty. While, IMO, it should be avoided the usage of such enums, adding support for it is not hard. So, postpone the check for empty identifiers to happen only at the dump phase. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/055ad57879f1b9381b90879e00f72fde1c3a5647.1614760910.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-08scripts: kernel-doc: fix attribute capture in function parsingAditya Srivastava
Currently, kernel-doc warns for function prototype parsing on the presence of attributes "__attribute_const__" and "__flatten" in the definition. There are 166 occurrences in ~70 files in the kernel tree for "__attribute_const__" and 5 occurrences in 4 files for "__flatten". Out of 166, there are 3 occurrences in three different files with "__attribute_const__" and a preceding kernel-doc; and, 1 occurrence in ./mm/percpu.c for "__flatten" with a preceding kernel-doc. All other occurrences have no preceding kernel-doc. Add support for "__attribute_const__" and "__flatten" attributes. A quick evaluation by running 'kernel-doc -none' on kernel-tree reveals that no additional warning or error has been added or removed by the fix. Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210306113510.31023-1-yashsri421@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-03-06scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef support for struct/union parsingAditya Srivastava
Currently, there are ~1290 occurrences in 447 files in the kernel tree 'typedef struct/union' syntax for defining some struct/union. However, kernel-doc currently does not support that syntax. Of the ~1290 occurrences, there are four occurrences in ./include/linux/zstd.h with typedef struct/union syntax and a preceding kernel-doc; all other occurrences have no preceding kernel-doc. Add support for parsing struct/union following this syntax. Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210225145033.11431-1-yashsri421@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-02-22scripts: kernel-doc: fix array element capture in pointer-to-func parsingAditya Srivastava
Currently, kernel-doc causes an unexpected error when array element (i.e., "type (*foo[bar])(args)") is present as pointer parameter in pointer-to-function parsing. For e.g., running kernel-doc -none on kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c causes this error: "Use of uninitialized value $param in regexp compilation at ...", in combination with: "warning: Function parameter or member '' not described in 'gcov_info'" Here, the parameter parsing does not take into account the presence of array element (i.e. square brackets) in $param. Provide a simple fix by adding square brackets in the regex, responsible for capturing $param. A quick evaluation, by running 'kernel-doc -none' on entire kernel-tree, reveals that no additional warning or error has been added or removed by the fix. Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217145625.14006-1-yashsri421@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-01-28scripts/kernel-doc: add internal hyperlink to DOC: sectionsMichal Wajdeczko
While DOC: section titles are not converted into RST headings sections and are only decorated with strong emphasis markup, nothing stops us from generating internal hyperlinks for them, to mimic implicit hyperlinks to RST headings. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210118110813.1490-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2021-01-18scripts: kernel-doc: validate kernel-doc markup with the actual namesMauro Carvalho Chehab
Kernel-doc currently expects that the kernel-doc markup to come just before the function/enum/struct/union/typedef prototype. Yet, if it find things like: /** * refcount_add - add a value to a refcount * @i: the value to add to the refcount * @r: the refcount */ static inline void __refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp); static inline void refcount_add(int i, refcount_t *r); Kernel-doc will do the wrong thing: foobar.h:6: warning: Function parameter or member 'oldp' not described in '__refcount_add' .. c:function:: void __refcount_add (int i, refcount_t *r, int *oldp) add a value to a refcount **Parameters** ``int i`` the value to add to the refcount ``refcount_t *r`` the refcount ``int *oldp`` *undescribed* Basically, it will document "__refcount_add" with the kernel-doc markup for refcount_add. If both functions have the same arguments, this won't even produce any warning! Add a logic to check if the kernel-doc identifier matches the actual name of the C function or data structure that will be documented. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/081546f141a496d6cabb99a4adc140444c705e93.1610610937.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-12-03scripts: kernel-doc: fix parsing function-like typedefsMauro Carvalho Chehab
Changeset 6b80975c6308 ("scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef parsing") added support for things like: typedef unsigned long foo(); However, it caused a regression on this prototype: typedef bool v4l2_check_dv_timings_fnc(const struct v4l2_dv_timings *t, void *handle); This is only noticed after adding a patch that checks if the kernel-doc identifier matches the typedef: ./scripts/kernel-doc -none $(git grep '^.. kernel-doc::' Documentation/ |cut -d ' ' -f 3|sort|uniq) 2>&1|grep expecting include/media/v4l2-dv-timings.h:38: warning: expecting prototype for typedef v4l2_check_dv_timings_fnc. Prototype was for typedef nc instead The problem is that, with the new parsing logic, it is not checking for complete words at the type part. Fix it by adding a \b at the end of each type word at the regex. fixes: 6b80975c6308 ("scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef parsing") Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/218ff56dcb8e73755005d3fb64586eb1841a276b.1606896997.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-11-13scripts: kernel-doc: Restore anonymous enum parsingAndy Shevchenko
The commit d38c8cfb0571 ("scripts: kernel-doc: add support for typedef enum") broke anonymous enum parsing. Restore it by relying on members rather than its name. Fixes: d38c8cfb0571 ("scripts: kernel-doc: add support for typedef enum") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201102170637.36138-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-10-28scripts: kernel-doc: use :c:union when neededMauro Carvalho Chehab
Sphinx C domain code after 3.2.1 will start complaning if :c:struct would be used for an union type: .../Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers:352: ../drivers/video/hdmi.c:851: WARNING: C 'identifier' cross-reference uses wrong tag: reference name is 'union hdmi_infoframe' but found name is 'struct hdmi_infoframe'. Full reference name is 'union hdmi_infoframe'. Full found name is 'struct hdmi_infoframe'. So, let's address this issue too in advance, in order to avoid future issues. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6e4ec3eec914df62389a299797a3880ae4490f35.1603791716.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-10-28scripts: kernel-doc: split typedef complex regexMauro Carvalho Chehab
The typedef regex for function prototypes are very complex. Split them into 3 separate regex and then join them using qr. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3a4af999a0d62d4ab9dfae1cdefdfcad93383356.1603792384.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-10-28scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef parsingMauro Carvalho Chehab
The include/linux/genalloc.h file defined this typedef: typedef unsigned long (*genpool_algo_t)(unsigned long *map,unsigned long size,unsigned long start,unsigned int nr,void *data, struct gen_pool *pool, unsigned long start_addr); Because it has a type composite of two words (unsigned long), the parser gets the typedef name wrong: .. c:macro:: long **Typedef**: Allocation callback function type definition Fix the regex in order to accept composite types when defining a typedef for a function pointer. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/328e8018041cc44f7a1684e57f8d111230761c4f.1603792384.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: try to use c:function if possibleMauro Carvalho Chehab
There are a few namespace clashes by using c:macro everywhere: basically, when using it, we can't have something like: .. c:struct:: pwm_capture .. c:macro:: pwm_capture So, we need to use, instead: .. c:function:: int pwm_capture (struct pwm_device * pwm, struct pwm_capture * result, unsigned long timeout) for the function declaration. The kernel-doc change was proposed by Jakob Lykke Andersen here: https://github.com/jakobandersen/linux_docs/commit/6fd2076ec001cca7466857493cd678df4dfe4a65 Although I did a different implementation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: fix line number handlingMauro Carvalho Chehab
Address several issues related to pointing to the wrong line number: 1) ensure that line numbers will always be initialized When section is the default (Description), the line number is not initializing, producing this: $ ./scripts/kernel-doc --enable-lineno ./drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c|less **Description** #define LINENO 0 In case of streamoff or release called on any context, 1] If the context is currently running, then abort job will be called 2] If the context is queued, then the context will be removed from the job_queue Which is not right. Ensure that the line number will always be there. After applied, the result now points to the right location: **Description** #define LINENO 410 In case of streamoff or release called on any context, 1] If the context is currently running, then abort job will be called 2] If the context is queued, then the context will be removed from the job_queue 2) The line numbers for function prototypes are always + 1, because it is taken at the line after handling the prototype. Change the logic to point to the next line after the /** */ block; 3) The "DOC:" line number should point to the same line as this markup is found, and not to the next one. Probably part of the issues were due to a but that was causing the line number offset to be incremented by one, if --export were used. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: allow passing desired Sphinx C domain dialectMauro Carvalho Chehab
When kernel-doc is called via kerneldoc.py, there's no need to auto-detect the Sphinx version, as the Sphinx module already knows it. So, add an optional parameter to allow changing the Sphinx dialect. As kernel-doc can also be manually called, keep the auto-detection logic if the parameter was not specified. On such case, emit a warning if sphinx-build can't be found at PATH. I ended using a suggestion from Joe for using a more readable regex, instead of using a complex one with a hidden group like: m/^(\d+)\.(\d+)(?:\.?(\d+)?)/ in order to get the optional <patch> argument. Thanks-to: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: don't mangle with parameter listMauro Carvalho Chehab
While kernel-doc needs to parse parameters in order to identify its name, it shouldn't be touching the type, as parsing it is very difficult, and errors happen. One current error is when parsing this parameter: const u32 (*tab)[256] Found at ./lib/crc32.c, on this function: u32 __pure crc32_be_generic (u32 crc, unsigned char const *p, size_t len, const u32 (*tab)[256], u32 polynomial); The current logic mangles it, producing this output: const u32 ( *tab That's something that it is not recognizeable. So, instead, let's push the argument as-is, and use it when printing the function prototype and when describing each argument. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef identificationMauro Carvalho Chehab
Some typedef expressions are output as normal functions. As we need to be clearer about the type with Sphinx 3.x, detect such cases. While here, fix a wrongly-indented block. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: reimplement -nofunction argumentMauro Carvalho Chehab
Right now, the build system doesn't use -nofunction, as it is pretty much useless, because it doesn't consider the other output modes (extern, internal), working only with all. Also, it is limited to exclude functions. Re-implement it in order to allow excluding any symbols from the document output, no matter what mode is used. The parameter was also renamed to "-nosymbol", as it express better its meaning. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: fix troubles with line countsMauro Carvalho Chehab
There's currently a bug with the way kernel-doc script counts line numbers that can be seen with: $ ./scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno include/linux/math64.h >all && ./scripts/kernel-doc -rst -internal -enable-lineno include/linux/math64.h >int && diff -U0 int all --- int 2020-09-28 12:58:08.927486808 +0200 +++ all 2020-09-28 12:58:08.905486845 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -#define LINENO 27 +#define LINENO 26 @@ -3 +3 @@ -#define LINENO 16 +#define LINENO 15 @@ -9 +9 @@ -#define LINENO 17 +#define LINENO 16 ... This is happening with perl version 5.30.3, but I'm not so sure if this is a perl bug, or if this is due to something else. In any case, fixing it is easy. Basically, when "-internal" parameter is used, the process_export_file() function opens the handle "IN". This makes the line number to be incremented, as the handler for the main open is also "IN". Fix the problem by using a different handler for the main open(). While here, add a missing close for it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: use a less pedantic markup for funcs on Sphinx 3.xMauro Carvalho Chehab
Unfortunately, Sphinx 3.x parser for c functions is too pedantic: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/8241 While it could be relaxed with some configurations, there are several corner cases that it would make it hard to maintain, and will require teaching conf.py about several macros. So, let's instead use the :c:macro notation. This will produce an output that it is not as nice as currently, but it should still be acceptable, and will provide cross-references, removing thousands of warnings when building with newer versions of Sphinx. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: make it more compatible with Sphinx 3.xMauro Carvalho Chehab
With Sphinx 3.x, the ".. c:type:" tag was changed to accept either: .. c:type:: typedef-like declaration .. c:type:: name Using it for other types (including functions) don't work anymore. So, there are newer tags for macro, enum, struct, union, and others, which doesn't exist on older versions. Add a check for the Sphinx version and change the produced tags accordingly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-15scripts: kernel-doc: add support for typedef enumMauro Carvalho Chehab
The PHY kernel-doc markup has gained support for documenting a typedef enum. However, right now the parser was not prepared for it. So, add support for parsing it. Fixes: 4069a572d423 ("net: phy: Document core PHY structures") Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-09-16kernel-doc: add support for ____cacheline_aligned attributeJonathan Cameron
Subroutine dump_struct uses type attributes to check if the struct syntax is valid. Then, it removes all attributes before using it for output. `____cacheline_aligned` is an attribute that is not included in both steps. Add it, since it is used by kernel structs. Based on previous patch to add ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp. Motivated by patches to reorder this attribute to before the variable name. Whilst we could do that in all cases, that would be a massive change and it is more common in the kernel to place this particular attribute after the variable name. A quick grep suggests approximately 400 instances of which 341 have this attribute just before a semicolon and hence after the variable name. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910185415.653139-1-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-09-10kernel-doc: include line numbers for function prototypesMauro Carvalho Chehab
This should solve bad error reports like this one: ./include/linux/iio/iio.h:0: WARNING: Unknown target name: "devm". Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/56eed0ba50cd726236acd12b11b55ce54854c5ea.1599660067.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-07-31scripts/kernel-doc: optionally treat warnings as errorsPierre-Louis Bossart
The kbuild bot recently added the W=1 option, which triggered documentation cleanups to squelch hundreds of kernel-doc warnings. To make sure new kernel contributions don't add regressions to kernel-doc descriptors, this patch suggests an option to treat warnings as errors in CI/automated tests. A -Werror command-line option is added to the kernel-doc script. When this option is set, the script will return the number of warnings found. The caller can then treat this positive return value as an error and stop the build. Using this command line option is however not straightforward when the kernel-doc script is called from other scripts. To align with typical kernel compilation or documentation generation, the Werror option is also set by checking the KCFLAGS environment variable, or if KDOC_WERROR is defined, as in the following examples: KCFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" make W=1 sound/ KCFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" make W=1 drivers/soundwire/ KDOC_WERROR=1 make htmldocs Note that in the last example the documentation build does not stop, only an additional log is provided. Credits to Randy Dunlap for suggesting the use of environment variables. Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728162040.92467-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-06-26scripts/kernel-doc: handle function pointer prototypesMauro Carvalho Chehab
There are some function pointer prototypes inside the net includes, like this one: int (*pcs_config)(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode, phy_interface_t interface, const unsigned long *advertising); There's nothing wrong using it with kernel-doc, but we need to add a rule for it to parse such kind of prototype. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fec520dd731a273013ae06b7653a19c7d15b9562.1592895969.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-06-26scripts/kernel-doc: parse __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASKMauro Carvalho Chehab
The __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK macro is a variant of DECLARE_BITMAP(), used by phylink.h. As we have already a parser for DECLARE_BITMAP(), let's add one for this macro, in order to avoid such warnings: ./include/linux/phylink.h:54: warning: Function parameter or member '__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(advertising' not described in 'phylink_link_state' ./include/linux/phylink.h:54: warning: Function parameter or member '__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(lp_advertising' not described in 'phylink_link_state' Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1d1dea67a28117c0b0c33271b139c4455fef287.1592895969.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-06-08Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: documentationAlexander A. Klimov
Rationale: Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate. Deterministic algorithm: For each file: For each line: If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`: For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`: If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions return 200 OK and serve the same content: Replace HTTP with HTTPS. Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526060544.25127-1-grandmaster@al2klimov.de Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-04-20scripts: kernel-doc: accept blank lines on parameter descriptionMauro Carvalho Chehab
Sphinx is very pedantic with respect to blank lines. Sometimes, in order to make it to properly handle something, we need to add a blank line. However, currently, any blank line inside a kernel-doc comment like: /* * @foo: bar * * foobar * * some description will be considered as if "foobar" was part of the description. This patch changes kernel-doc behavior. After it, foobar will be considered as part of the parameter text. The description will only be considered as such if it starts with: zero spaces after asterisk: *foo one space after asterisk: * foo or have a explicit Description section: * Description: Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c07d2862792d75a2691d69c9eceb7b89a0164cc0.1586881715.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-04-20scripts: kernel-doc: accept negation like !@varMauro Carvalho Chehab
On a few places, it sometimes need to indicate a negation of a parameter, like: !@fshared This pattern happens, for example, at: kernel/futex.c and it is perfectly valid. However, kernel-doc currently transforms it into: !**fshared** This won't do what it would be expected. Fortunately, fixing the script is a simple matter of storing the "!" before "@" and adding it after the bold markup, like: **!fshared** Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0314b47f8c3e1f9db00d5375a73dc3cddd8a21f2.1586881715.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-04-20scripts: kernel-doc: proper handle @foo->bar()Mauro Carvalho Chehab
The pattern @foo->bar() is valid, as it can be used by a function pointer inside a struct passed as a parameter. Right now, it causes a warning: ./drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c:606: WARNING: Inline strong start-string without end-string. In this specific case, the kernel-doc markup is: /** * fw_core_remove_address_handler() - unregister an address handler * @handler: callback * * To be called in process context. * * When fw_core_remove_address_handler() returns, @handler->callback() is * guaranteed to not run on any CPU anymore. */ With seems valid on my eyes. So, instead of trying to hack the kernel-doc markup, let's teach it about how to handle such things. This should likely remove lots of other similar warnings as well. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/48b46426d7bf6ff7529f20e5718fbf4e9758e62c.1586881715.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-04-15scripts/kernel-doc: Add missing close-paren in c:function directivesPeter Maydell
When kernel-doc generates a 'c:function' directive for a function one of whose arguments is a function pointer, it fails to print the close-paren after the argument list of the function pointer argument. For instance: long work_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn) (void *, void * arg) in driver-api/basics.html is missing a ')' separating the "void *" of the 'fn' arguments from the ", void * arg" which is an argument to work_on_cpu(). Add the missing close-paren, so that we render the prototype correctly: long work_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void * arg) (Note that Sphinx stops rendering a space between the '(fn*)' and the '(void *)' once it gets something that's syntactically valid.) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414143743.32677-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-11-07scripts/kernel-doc: Add support for named variable macro argumentsJonathan Neuschäfer
Currently, when kernel-doc encounters a macro with a named variable argument[1], such as this: #define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...) ... it expects the variable argument to be documented as `cond...`, rather than `cond`. This is semantically wrong, because the name (as used in the macro body) is actually `cond`. With this patch, kernel-doc will accept the name without dots (`cond` in the example above) in doc comments, and warn if the name with dots (`cond...`) is used and verbose mode[2] is enabled. The support for the `cond...` syntax can be removed later, when the documentation of all such macros has been switched to the new syntax. Testing this patch on top of v5.4-rc6, `make htmldocs` shows a few changes in log output and HTML output: 1) The following warnings[3] are eliminated: ./include/linux/rculist.h:374: warning: Excess function parameter 'cond' description in 'list_for_each_entry_rcu' ./include/linux/rculist.h:651: warning: Excess function parameter 'cond' description in 'hlist_for_each_entry_rcu' 2) For list_for_each_entry_rcu and hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, the correct description is shown 3) Named variable arguments are shown without dots [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html [2]: scripts/kernel-doc -v [3]: See also https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git/commit/?h=dev&id=5bc4bc0d6153617eabde275285b7b5a8137fdf3c Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-10-01kernel-doc: add support for ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp attributeAndré Almeida
Subroutine dump_struct uses type attributes to check if the struct syntax is valid. Then, it removes all attributes before using it for output. `____cacheline_aligned_in_smp` is an attribute that is not included in both steps. Add it, since it is used by kernel structs. Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-10-01kernel-doc: fix processing nested structs with attributesAndré Almeida
The current regular expression for strip attributes of structs (and for nested ones as well) also removes all whitespaces that may surround the attribute. After that, the code will split structs and iterate for each symbol separated by comma at the end of struct definition (e.g. "} alias1, alias2;"). However, if the nested struct does not have any alias and has an attribute, it will result in a empty string at the closing bracket (e.g "};"). This will make the split return nothing and $newmember will keep uninitialized. Fix that, by ensuring that the attribute substitution will leave at least one whitespace. Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-08-12kernel-doc: Allow anonymous enumAndy Shevchenko
In C is a valid construction to have an anonymous enumerator. Though we have now: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:240: error: Cannot parse enum! Support it in the kernel-doc script. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-08-06kernel-doc: ignore __printf attributeRandy Dunlap
Ignore __printf() function attributes just as other __attribute__ strings are ignored. Fixes this kernel-doc warning message: include/kunit/kunit-stream.h:58: warning: Function parameter or member '2' not described in '__printf' Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-06-26kernel-doc: Don't try to mark up function namesJonathan Corbet
We now have better automarkup in sphinx itself and, besides, this markup was incorrect and left :c:func: gunk in the processed docs. Sort of discouraging that nobody ever noticed...:) As a first step toward the removal of impenetrable regex magic from kernel-doc it's a tiny one, but you have to start somewhere. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-05-27kernel-doc: always name missing kerneldoc sectionsJonathan Corbet
The "no structured comments found" warning is not particularly useful if there are several invocations, one of which is looking for something wrong. So if something specific has been requested, make it clear that it's the one we weren't able to find. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-01-16kernel-doc: suppress 'not described' warnings for embedded struct fieldsJonathan Corbet
The ability to add kerneldoc comments for fields in embedded structures is useful, but it brought along a whole bunch of warnings for fields that could not be described before. In many cases, there's little value in adding docs for these nested fields, and in cases like: struct a { struct b { int c; } d, e; }; "c" would have to be described twice (as d.c and e.c) to make the warnings go away. We can no doubt do something smarter, but simply suppressing the warnings for this case removes about 70 warnings from the docs build, freeing us to focus on the ones that matter more. So make kerneldoc be silent about missing descriptions for any field containing a ".". Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-11-25scripts/kernel-doc: Fix struct and struct field attribute processingSakari Ailus
The kernel-doc attempts to clear the struct and struct member attributes from the API documentation it produces. It falls short of the job in the following respects: - extra whitespaces are left where __attribute__((...)) was removed, - only a single attribute is removed per struct, - attributes (such as aligned) containing numbers were not removed, - attributes are only cleared from struct fields, not structs themselves. This patch addresses these issues by removing the attributes. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-11-07kernel-doc: extend $type_param to match members referenced by pointerMike Rapoport
Currently, function parameter description can match '@type.member' expressions but fails to match '@type->member'. Extend the $type_param regex to allow matching both Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-11-07kernel-doc: kill trailing whitespaceMike Rapoport
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-10-18kernel-doc: fix declaration type determinationRandy Dunlap
Make declaration type determination more robust. When scripts/kernel-doc is deciding if some kernel-doc notation contains an enum, a struct, a union, a typedef, or a function, it does a pattern match on the beginning of the string, looking for a match with one of "struct", "union", "enum", or "typedef", and otherwise defaults to a function declaration type. However, if a function or a function-like macro has a name that begins with "struct" (e.g., struct_size()), then kernel-doc incorrectly decides that this is a struct declaration. Fix this by looking for the declaration type keywords having an ending word boundary (\b), so that "struct_size" will not match a struct declaration. I compared lots of html before/after output from core-api, driver-api, and networking. There were no differences in any of the files that I checked. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-08-06scripts/kernel-doc: Escape all literal braces in regexesBen Hutchings
Commit 701b3a3c0ac4 ("PATCH scripts/kernel-doc") fixed the two instances of literal braces that Perl 5.28 warns about, but there are still more than it doesn't warn about. Escape all left braces that are treated as literal characters. Also escape literal right braces, for consistency and to avoid confusing bracket-matching in text editors. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-07-23PATCH scripts/kernel-docvaldis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Fix a warning whinge from Perl introduced by "scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions" Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/({ <-- HERE [^\{\}]*})/ at ./scripts/kernel-doc line 1155. Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/({ <-- HERE )/ at ./scripts/kernel-doc line 1179. Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>