summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/test_bpf.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-03-29test_bpf: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check in test_skb_segment()Dan Carpenter
The skb_segment() function returns error pointers on error. It never returns NULL. Fixes: 76db8087c4c9 ("net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-03-25net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf moduleYonghong Song
Without the previous commit, "modprobe test_bpf" will have the following errors: ... [ 98.149165] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 98.159362] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3667! [ 98.169756] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 98.179370] Modules linked in: [ 98.179371] test_bpf(+) ... which triggers the bug the previous commit intends to fix. The skbs are constructed to mimic what mlx5 may generate. The packet size/header may not mimic real cases in production. But the processing flow is similar. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-03-20test_bpf: Fix testing with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y on other archesThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that case. However, it does not fail on other architectures, which have a different JIT compiler design. So, test_bpf has started to fail to load on those. After this fix, test_bpf loads fine on both x86_64 and ppc64el. Fixes: 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-02-28test_bpf: reduce MAX_TESTRUNSEric Dumazet
For tests that are using the maximal number of BPF instruction, each run takes 20 usec. Looping 10,000 times on them totals 200 ms, which is bad when the loop is not preemptible. test_bpf: #264 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 19248 18548 PASS test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:1 20896 PASS Lets divide by ten the number of iterations, so that max latency is 20ms. We could use need_resched() to break the loop earlier if we believe 20 ms is too much. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-02-26test_bpf: add a schedule pointEric Dumazet
test_bpf() is taking 1.6 seconds nowadays, it is time to add a schedule point in it. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-02-05bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=yYonghong Song
With CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined in the config file, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh failed like below: [root@localhost bpf]# ./test_kmod.sh sysctl: setting key "net.core.bpf_jit_enable": Invalid argument [ JIT enabled:0 hardened:0 ] [ 132.175681] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 [ 132.458834] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed] [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:0 ] [ 133.456025] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 [ 133.730935] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed] [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:1 ] [ 134.769730] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 [ 135.050864] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed] [ JIT enabled:1 hardened:2 ] [ 136.442882] test_bpf: #297 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... FAIL to prog_create err=-524 len=4096 [ 136.821810] test_bpf: Summary: 348 PASSED, 1 FAILED, [340/340 JIT'ed] [root@localhost bpf]# The test_kmod.sh load/remove test_bpf.ko multiple times with different settings for sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_{enable,harden}. The failed test #297 of test_bpf.ko is designed such that JIT always fails. Commit 290af86629b2 (bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config) introduced the following tightening logic: ... if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(fp->aux)) { fp = bpf_int_jit_compile(fp); #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON if (!fp->jited) { *err = -ENOTSUPP; return fp; } #endif ... With this logic, Test #297 always gets return value -ENOTSUPP when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined, causing the test failure. This patch fixed the failure by marking Test #297 as expected failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is defined. Fixes: 290af86629b2 (bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config) Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-01-26bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and othersDaniel Borkmann
Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new test cases. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-19bpf: add couple of test cases for signed extended immsDaniel Borkmann
Add a couple of test cases for interpreter and JIT that are related to an issue we faced some time ago in Cilium [1], which is fixed in LLVM with commit e53750e1e086 ("bpf: fix bug on silently truncating 64-bit immediate"). Test cases were run-time checking kernel to behave as intended which should also provide some guidance for current or new JITs in case they should trip over this. Added for cBPF and eBPF. [1] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/2162 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-01-09bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON configAlexei Starovoitov
The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715. A quote from goolge project zero blog: "At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying. So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets." To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode. So far eBPF JIT is supported by: x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64 The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only. In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden v2->v3: - move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel) v1->v2: - fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback) - fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback) - add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func - retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk. It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next Considered doing: int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT; but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place and remove this jit_init() function. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15bpf: add test case for ld_abs and helper changing pkt dataDaniel Borkmann
Add a test that i) uses LD_ABS, ii) zeroing R6 before call, iii) calls a helper that triggers reload of cached skb data, iv) uses LD_ABS again. It's added for test_bpf in order to do runtime testing after JITing as well as test_verifier to test that the sequence is allowed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2017-08-09bpf: add BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructionsDaniel Borkmann
Currently, eBPF only understands BPF_JGT (>), BPF_JGE (>=), BPF_JSGT (s>), BPF_JSGE (s>=) instructions, this means that particularly *JLT/*JLE counterparts involving immediates need to be rewritten from e.g. X < [IMM] by swapping arguments into [IMM] > X, meaning the immediate first is required to be loaded into a register Y := [IMM], such that then we can compare with Y > X. Note that the destination operand is always required to be a register. This has the downside of having unnecessarily increased register pressure, meaning complex program would need to spill other registers temporarily to stack in order to obtain an unused register for the [IMM]. Loading to registers will thus also affect state pruning since we need to account for that register use and potentially those registers that had to be spilled/filled again. As a consequence slightly more stack space might have been used due to spilling, and BPF programs are a bit longer due to extra code involving the register load and potentially required spill/fills. Thus, add BPF_JLT (<), BPF_JLE (<=), BPF_JSLT (s<), BPF_JSLE (s<=) counterparts to the eBPF instruction set. Modifying LLVM to remove the NegateCC() workaround in a PoC patch at [1] and allowing it to also emit the new instructions resulted in cilium's BPF programs that are injected into the fast-path to have a reduced program length in the range of 2-3% (e.g. accumulated main and tail call sections from one of the object file reduced from 4864 to 4729 insns), reduced complexity in the range of 10-30% (e.g. accumulated sections reduced in one of the cases from 116432 to 88428 insns), and reduced stack usage in the range of 1-5% (e.g. accumulated sections from one of the object files reduced from 824 to 784b). The modification for LLVM will be incorporated in a backwards compatible way. Plan is for LLVM to have i) a target specific option to offer a possibility to explicitly enable the extension by the user (as we have with -m target specific extensions today for various CPU insns), and ii) have the kernel checked for presence of the extensions and enable them transparently when the user is selecting more aggressive options such as -march=native in a bpf target context. (Other frontends generating BPF byte code, e.g. ply can probe the kernel directly for its code generation.) [1] https://github.com/borkmann/llvm/tree/bpf-insns Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-20net: introduce __skb_put_[zero, data, u8]yuan linyu
follow Johannes Berg, semantic patch file as below, @@ identifier p, p2; expression len; expression skb; type t, t2; @@ ( -p = __skb_put(skb, len); +p = __skb_put_zero(skb, len); | -p = (t)__skb_put(skb, len); +p = __skb_put_zero(skb, len); ) ... when != p ( p2 = (t2)p; -memset(p2, 0, len); | -memset(p, 0, len); ) @@ identifier p; expression len; expression skb; type t; @@ ( -t p = __skb_put(skb, len); +t p = __skb_put_zero(skb, len); ) ... when != p ( -memset(p, 0, len); ) @@ type t, t2; identifier p, p2; expression skb; @@ t *p; ... ( -p = __skb_put(skb, sizeof(t)); +p = __skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t)); | -p = (t *)__skb_put(skb, sizeof(t)); +p = __skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t)); ) ... when != p ( p2 = (t2)p; -memset(p2, 0, sizeof(*p)); | -memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p)); ) @@ expression skb, len; @@ -memset(__skb_put(skb, len), 0, len); +__skb_put_zero(skb, len); @@ expression skb, len, data; @@ -memcpy(__skb_put(skb, len), data, len); +__skb_put_data(skb, data, len); @@ expression SKB, C, S; typedef u8; identifier fn = {__skb_put}; fresh identifier fn2 = fn ## "_u8"; @@ - *(u8 *)fn(SKB, S) = C; + fn2(SKB, C); Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-14test_bpf: Add test to make conditional jump cross a large number of insns.David Daney
On MIPS, conditional branches can only span 32k instructions. To exceed this limit in the JIT with the BPF maximum of 4k insns, we need to choose eBPF insns that expand to more than 8 machine instructions. Use BPF_LD_ABS as it is quite complex. This forces the JIT to invert the sense of the branch to branch around a long jump to the end. This (somewhat) verifies that the branch inversion logic and target address calculation of the long jumps are done correctly. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-31bpf: fix stack_depth usage by test_bpf.koAlexei Starovoitov
test_bpf.ko doesn't call verifier before selecting interpreter or JITing, hence the tests need to manually specify the amount of stack they consume. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-25test_bpf: Add a couple of tests for BPF_JSGE.David Daney
Some JITs can optimize comparisons with zero. Add a couple of BPF_JSGE tests against immediate zero. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-03test_bpf: Use ULL suffix for 64-bit constantsGeert Uytterhoeven
On 32-bit: lib/test_bpf.c:4772: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4772: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4773: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4773: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4787: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4787: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4801: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4801: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4802: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type lib/test_bpf.c:4802: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type On 32-bit systems, "long" is only 32-bit. Replace the "UL" suffix by "ULL" to fix this. Fixes: 85f68fe898320575 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-02bpf, arm64: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64Daniel Borkmann
When the instruction right before the branch destination is a 64 bit load immediate, we currently calculate the wrong jump offset in the ctx->offset[] array as we only account one instruction slot for the 64 bit load immediate although it uses two BPF instructions. Fix it up by setting the offset into the right slot after we incremented the index. Before (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 54ffff82 b.cs 0x00000020 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] After (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 540000a2 b.cs 0x00000044 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] Also, add a couple of test cases to make sure JITs pass this test. Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8. The added test cases all pass after the fix. Fixes: 8eee539ddea0 ("arm64: bpf: fix out-of-bounds read in bpf2a64_offset()") Reported-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-02bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADDDaniel Borkmann
This work adds BPF_XADD for BPF_W/BPF_DW to the arm64 JIT and therefore completes JITing of all BPF instructions, meaning we can thus also remove the 'notyet' label and do not need to fall back to the interpreter when BPF_XADD is used in a program! This now also brings arm64 JIT in line with x86_64, s390x, ppc64, sparc64, where all current eBPF features are supported. BPF_W example from test_bpf: .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x10), BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_W, R10, R0, -40), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, [...] 00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18 00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16 0000002c: b82b6b2a str w10, [x25,x11] // start of xadd mapping: 00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25 00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10] 0000003c: 885f7d4b ldxr w11, [x10] 00000040: 0b07016b add w11, w11, w7 00000044: 880b7d4b stxr w11, w11, [x10] 00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c // end of xadd mapping: [...] BPF_DW example from test_bpf: .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, -40, 0x10), BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, R10, R0, -40), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, [...] 00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18 00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16 0000002c: f82b6b2a str x10, [x25,x11] // start of xadd mapping: 00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25 00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10] 0000003c: c85f7d4b ldxr x11, [x10] 00000040: 8b07016b add x11, x11, x7 00000044: c80b7d4b stxr w11, x11, [x10] 00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c // end of xadd mapping: [...] Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8, test suite results after the patch: No JIT: [ 3751.855362] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/303 JIT'ed] With JIT: [ 3573.759527] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [303/303 JIT'ed] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-10-20bpf, test: fix ld_abs + vlan push/pop stress testDaniel Borkmann
After commit 636c2628086e ("net: skbuff: Remove errornous length validation in skb_vlan_pop()") mentioned test case stopped working, throwing a -12 (ENOMEM) return code. The issue however is not due to 636c2628086e, but rather due to a buggy test case that got uncovered from the change in behaviour in 636c2628086e. The data_size of that test case for the skb was set to 1. In the bpf_fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop() handler bpf insns are generated that loop with: reading skb data, pushing 68 tags, reading skb data, popping 68 tags, reading skb data, etc, in order to force a skb expansion and thus trigger that JITs recache skb->data. Problem is that initial data_size is too small. While before 636c2628086e, the test silently bailed out due to the skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN check with returning 0, and now throwing an error from failing skb_ensure_writable(). Set at least minimum of ETH_HLEN as an initial length so that on first push of data, equivalent pop will succeed. Fixes: 4d9c5c53ac99 ("test_bpf: add bpf_skb_vlan_push/pop() tests") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-09-15test_bpf: fix the dummy skb after dissector changesJakub Kicinski
Commit d5709f7ab776 ("flow_dissector: For stripped vlan, get vlan info from skb->vlan_tci") made flow dissector look at vlan_proto when vlan is present. Since test_bpf sets skb->vlan_tci to ~0 (including VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) we have to populate skb->vlan_proto. Fixes false negative on test #24: test_bpf: #24 LD_PAYLOAD_OFF jited:0 175 ret 0 != 42 FAIL (1 times) Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@netronome.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-05-16bpf: prepare bpf_int_jit_compile/bpf_prog_select_runtime apisDaniel Borkmann
Since the blinding is strictly only called from inside eBPF JITs, we need to change signatures for bpf_int_jit_compile() and bpf_prog_select_runtime() first in order to prepare that the eBPF program we're dealing with can change underneath. Hence, for call sites, we need to return the latest prog. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-06lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD testsNaveen N. Rao
Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to quickly tag the precise problem. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-06lib/test_bpf: Add test to check for result of 32-bit add that overflowsNaveen N. Rao
BPF_ALU32 and BPF_ALU64 tests for adding two 32-bit values that results in 32-bit overflow. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-06lib/test_bpf: Add tests for unsigned BPF_JGTNaveen N. Rao
Unsigned Jump-if-Greater-Than. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-06lib/test_bpf: Fix JMP_JSET testsNaveen N. Rao
JMP_JSET tests incorrectly used BPF_JNE. Fix the same. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-12-18bpf, test: add couple of test casesDaniel Borkmann
Add couple of test cases for interpreter but also JITs, f.e. to test that when imm32 moves are being done, upper 32bits of the regs are being zero extended. Without JIT: [...] [ 1114.129301] test_bpf: #43 MOV REG64 jited:0 128 PASS [ 1114.130626] test_bpf: #44 MOV REG32 jited:0 139 PASS [ 1114.132055] test_bpf: #45 LD IMM64 jited:0 124 PASS [...] With JIT (generated code can as usual be nicely verified with the help of bpf_jit_disasm tool): [...] [ 1062.726782] test_bpf: #43 MOV REG64 jited:1 6 PASS [ 1062.726890] test_bpf: #44 MOV REG32 jited:1 6 PASS [ 1062.726993] test_bpf: #45 LD IMM64 jited:1 6 PASS [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-11-05bpf: add mod default A and X test casesYang Shi
When running "mod X" operation, if X is 0 the filter has to be halt. Add new test cases to cover A = A mod X if X is 0, and A = A mod 1. CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.Nicolas Schichan
It is mandatory for the JIT or interpreter to reset the A and X registers to 0 before running the filter. Check that it is the case on various ALU and JMP instructions. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: add more tests for LD_ABS and LD_IND.Nicolas Schichan
This exerces the LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions for various sizes and alignments. This also checks that X when used as an offset to a BPF_IND instruction first in a filter is correctly set to 0. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: add module parameters to filter the tests to run.Nicolas Schichan
When developping on the interpreter or a particular JIT, it can be interesting to restrict the tests list to a specific test or a particular range of tests. This patch adds the following module parameters to the test_bpf module: * test_name=<string>: only the specified named test will be run. * test_id=<number>: only the test with the specified id will be run (see the output of test_bpf without parameters to get the test id). * test_range=<number>,<number>: only the tests within IDs in the specified id range are run (see the output of test_bpf without parameters to get the test ids). Any invalid range, test id or test name will result in -EINVAL being returned and no tests being run. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: test LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions on fragmented skbs.Nicolas Schichan
These new tests exercise various load sizes and offsets crossing the head/fragment boundary. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: allow tests to specify an skb fragment.Nicolas Schichan
This introduce a new test->aux flag (FLAG_SKB_FRAG) to tell the populate_skb() function to add a fragment to the test skb containing the data specified in test->frag_data). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-06test_bpf: avoid oopsing the kernel when generate_test_data() fails.Nicolas Schichan
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-30test_bpf: assign type to native eBPF test casesDaniel Borkmann
As JITs start to perform optimizations whether to clear A and X on eBPF programs in the prologue, we should actually assign a program type to the native eBPF test cases. It doesn't really matter which program type, as these instructions don't go through the verifier, but it needs to be a type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC. This reflects eBPF programs loaded via bpf(2) system call (!= type unspec) vs. classic BPF to eBPF migrations (== type unspec). Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-20test_bpf: add bpf_skb_vlan_push/pop() testsAlexei Starovoitov
improve accuracy of timing in test_bpf and add two stress tests: - {skb->data[0], get_smp_processor_id} repeated 2k times - {skb->data[0], vlan_push} x 68 followed by {skb->data[0], vlan_pop} x 68 1st test is useful to test performance of JIT implementation of BPF_LD_ABS together with BPF_CALL instructions. 2nd test is stressing skb_vlan_push/pop logic together with skb->data access via BPF_LD_ABS insn which checks that re-caching of skb->data is done correctly. In order to call bpf_skb_vlan_push() from test_bpf.ko have to add three export_symbol_gpl. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-07-08test_bpf: extend tests for 32-bit endianness conversionXi Wang
Currently "ALU_END_FROM_BE 32" and "ALU_END_FROM_LE 32" do not test if the upper bits of the result are zeros (the arm64 JIT had such bugs). Extend the two tests to catch this. Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-27test_bpf: add similarly conflicting jump test case only for classicDaniel Borkmann
While 3b52960266a3 ("test_bpf: add more eBPF jump torture cases") added the int3 bug test case only for eBPF, which needs exactly 11 passes to converge, here's a version for classic BPF with 11 passes, and one that would need 70 passes on x86_64 to actually converge for being successfully JITed. Effectively, all jumps are being optimized out resulting in a JIT image of just 89 bytes (from originally max BPF insns), only returning K. Might be useful as a receipe for folks wanting to craft a test case when backporting the fix in commit 3f7352bf21f8 ("x86: bpf_jit: fix compilation of large bpf programs") while not having eBPF. The 2nd one is delegated to the interpreter as the last pass still results in shrinking, in other words, this one won't be JITed on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-25test_bpf: add more eBPF jump torture casesDaniel Borkmann
Add two more eBPF test cases for JITs, i.e. the second one revealed a bug in the x86_64 JIT compiler, where only an int3 filled image from the allocator was emitted and later wrongly set by the compiler as the bpf_func program code since optimization pass boundary was surpassed w/o actually emitting opcodes. Interpreter: [ 45.782892] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 11 PASS [ 45.783062] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 14705 PASS After x86_64 JIT (fixed): [ 80.495638] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:1 6 PASS [ 80.495957] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:1 17157 PASS Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/364729 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-22test_bpf: Add backward jump test caseMichael Holzheu
Currently the testsuite does not have a test case with a backward jump. The s390x JIT (kernel 4.0) had a bug in that area. So add one new test case for this now. Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-14test_bpf: fix sparse warningsMichael Holzheu
Fix several sparse warnings like: lib/test_bpf.c:1824:25: sparse: constant 4294967295 is so big it is long lib/test_bpf.c:1878:25: sparse: constant 0x0000ffffffff0000 is so big it is long Fixes: cffc642d93f9 ("test_bpf: add 173 new testcases for eBPF") Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-14test_bpf: add tests related to BPF_MAXINSNSDaniel Borkmann
Couple of torture test cases related to the bug fixed in 0b59d8806a31 ("ARM: net: delegate filter to kernel interpreter when imm_offset() return value can't fit into 12bits."). I've added a helper to allocate and fill the insn space. Output on x86_64 from my laptop: test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:0 7 PASS test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:0 8 PASS test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:0 11553 PASS test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:0 9 PASS test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20329 20398 PASS test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 32178 32475 PASS test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 10518 PASS test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:1 1625 PASS test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:1 8 PASS test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:1 3301 3174 PASS test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 24107 23491 PASS test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:1 8651 PASS Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-12test_bpf: add 173 new testcases for eBPFMichael Holzheu
add an exhaustive set of eBPF tests bringing total to: test_bpf: Summary: 233 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/226 JIT'ed] Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-11test: bpf: extend "load 64-bit immediate" testcaseXi Wang
Extend the testcase to catch a signedness bug in the arm64 JIT: test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate jited:1 ret -1 != 1 FAIL (1 times) This is useful to ensure other JITs won't have a similar bug. Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/8/458 Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-04-30test_bpf: indicate whether bpf prog got jited in test suiteDaniel Borkmann
I think this is useful to verify whether a filter could be JITed or not in case of bpf_prog_enable >= 1, which otherwise the test suite doesn't tell besides taking a good peek at the performance numbers. Nicolas Schichan reported a bug in the ARM JIT compiler that rejected and waved the filter to the interpreter although it shouldn't have. Nevertheless, the test passes as expected, but such information is not visible. It's i.e. useful for the remaining classic JITs, but also for implementing remaining opcodes that are not yet present in eBPF JITs (e.g. ARM64 waves some of them to the interpreter). This minor patch allows to grep through dmesg to find those accordingly, but also provides a total summary, i.e.: [<X>/53 JIT'ed] # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # insmod lib/test_bpf.ko # dmesg | grep "jited:0" dmesg example on the ARM issue with JIT rejection: [...] [ 67.925387] test_bpf: #2 ADD_SUB_MUL_K jited:1 24 PASS [ 67.930889] test_bpf: #3 DIV_MOD_KX jited:0 794 PASS [ 67.943940] test_bpf: #4 AND_OR_LSH_K jited:1 20 20 PASS [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-12-08test: bpf: expand DIV_KX to DIV_MOD_KXDenis Kirjanov
Expand DIV_KX to use BPF_MOD operation in the DIV_KX bpf 'classic' test. CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-10-30test: bpf: add a testcase reduced from nmapAlexei Starovoitov
nmap generates classic BPF programs to filter ARP packets with given target MAC which triggered a bug in eBPF x64 JIT. The bug was fixed in commit e0ee9c12157d ("x86: bpf_jit: fix two bugs in eBPF JIT compiler") This patch is adding a testcase in eBPF instructions (those that were generated by classic->eBPF converter) to be processed by JIT. The test is primarily targeting JIT compiler. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-22net: bpf: fix compiler warnings in test_bpfAlexei Starovoitov
old gcc 4.2 used by avr32 architecture produces warnings: lib/test_bpf.c:1741: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type lib/test_bpf.c:1741: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type lib/test_bpf.c: In function '__run_one': lib/test_bpf.c:1897: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function silence these warnings. Fixes: 02ab695bb37e ("net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction") Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-09net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instructionAlexei Starovoitov
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register. All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction. Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction: insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM insn[0].dst_reg = destination register insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit insn[1].code = 0 insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit All unused fields must be zero. Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register. x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64' arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter. It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions: BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32) BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32) BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32) BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2) User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only. To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide. For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose. src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and load in-kernel map pointer. src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other instructions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-05net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-onlyDaniel Borkmann
With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way, hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow seems appropriate. This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to read-only pages. In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g. caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea is derived from commit 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore. After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT image pointer). Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(), including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no performance penalty. Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual inspection of kernel_page_tables. Brad Spengler proposed the same idea via Twitter during development of this patch. Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa. Suggested-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-08-25bpf: x86: add missing 'shift by register' instructions to x64 eBPF JITAlexei Starovoitov
'shift by register' operations are supported by eBPF interpreter, but were accidently left out of x64 JIT compiler. Fix it and add a testcase. Reported-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT") Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-11 09:35:17 +0000