| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When an allocation with lower dma_coherent mask fails, dma_direct_alloc()
retries the allocation with GFP_DMA. But, this is useless for
architectures that hav no ZONE_DMA.
Fix it by adding the check of CONFIG_ZONE_DMA before retrying the
allocation.
Fixes: 95f183916d4b ("dma-direct: retry allocations using GFP_DMA for small masks")
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Revert the clearing of __GFP_ZERO in dma_alloc_attrs and move it to
dma_direct_alloc for now. While most common architectures always zero dma
cohereny allocations (and x86 did so since day one) this is not documented
and at least arc and s390 do not zero without the explicit __GFP_ZERO
argument.
Fixes: 57bf5a8963f8 ("dma-mapping: clear harmful GFP_* flags in common code")
Reported-by: Evgeniy Didin <Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com>
Reported-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Evgeniy Didin <Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180328133535.17302-2-hch@lst.de
|
|
With that in place the generic DMA-direct routines can be used to
allocate non-encrypted bounce buffers, and the x86 SEV case can use
the generic swiotlb ops including nice features such as using CMA
allocations.
Note that I'm not too happy about using sev_active() in DMA-direct, but
I couldn't come up with a good enough name for a wrapper to make it
worth adding.
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180319103826.12853-14-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Various PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS implementations rely on this flag to make proper
decisions for block and networking addressability.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
|
So that they don't need to indirect through the operation vector.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
|
|
If an attempt to allocate memory succeeded, but isn't inside the
supported DMA mask, retry the allocation with GFP_DMA set as a
last resort.
Based on the x86 code, but an off by one error in what is now
dma_coherent_ok has been fixed vs the x86 code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
This allows to dip into zones for lower memory if they are available.
If one of the zones is not available the corresponding GFP_* flag
will evaluate to 0 so they won't change anything. We provide an
arch tunable for those architectures that do not use GFP_DMA for
the lowest 24-bits, given that there are a few.
Roughly based on the x86 code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
To preserve the x86 behavior.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
|
Try the CMA allocator for coherent allocations if supported.
Roughly modelled after the x86 code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Roughly based on the x86 pci-nommu implementation.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
This means it uses whatever linear remapping scheme that the architecture
provides is used in the generic dma_direct ops.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
|
|
The trivial direct mapping implementation already does a virtual to
physical translation which isn't strictly a noop, and will soon learn
to do non-direct but linear physical to dma translations through the
device offset and a few small tricks. Rename it to a better fitting
name.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
|
