summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-07-14Merge branch 'core/softirq' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'core/softirq' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: softirq: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable softirq: remove initialization of static per-cpu variable Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL
2008-07-14Merge branch 'sched/new-API-sched_setscheduler' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'sched/new-API-sched_setscheduler' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: sched: add new API sched_setscheduler_nocheck: add a flag to control access checks
2008-07-14Merge branch 'auto-ftrace-next' into tracing/for-linusIngo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c arch/x86/lib/Makefile include/asm-x86/irqflags.h kernel/Makefile kernel/sched.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-14Merge branch 'sched/for-linus' into tracing/for-linusIngo Molnar
2008-07-13Merge branch 'linus' into sched/develIngo Molnar
2008-07-12Merge branch 'linus' into x86/coreIngo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-10sched: fix cpu hotplug, cleanupLinus Torvalds
Clean up __migrate_task(): to just have separate "done" and "fail" cases, instead of that "out" case with random error behavior. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-10Merge branch 'tracing/ftrace' into auto-ftrace-nextIngo Molnar
2008-07-10sched: fix cpu hotplugDmitry Adamushko
I think we may have a race between try_to_wake_up() and migrate_live_tasks() -> move_task_off_dead_cpu() when the later one may end up looping endlessly. Interrupts are enabled on other CPUs when migration_call(CPU_DEAD, ...) is called so we may get a race between try_to_wake_up() and migrate_live_tasks() -> move_task_off_dead_cpu(). The former one may push a task out of a dead CPU causing the later one to loop endlessly. Heiko Carstens observed: | That's exactly what explains a dump I got yesterday. Thanks for fixing! :) Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-08sched, numa: replace MAX_NUMNODES with nr_node_ids in kernel/sched.cMike Travis
* Replace usages of MAX_NUMNODES with nr_node_ids in kernel/sched.c, where appropriate. This saves some allocated space as well as many wasted cycles going through node entries that are non-existent. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-07Merge commit 'v2.6.26-rc9' into sched/develIngo Molnar
2008-07-04sched: fix accounting in task delay accounting & migrationAnkita Garg
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:50 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote: > > > Thanks Peter for the explanation... > > > > I agree with the above and that is the reason why I did not see weird > > values with cpu_time. But, run_delay still would suffer skews as the end > > points for delta could be taken on different cpus due to migration (more > > so on RT kernel due to the push-pull operations). With the below patch, > > I could not reproduce the issue I had seen earlier. After every dequeue, > > we take the delta and start wait measurements from zero when moved to a > > different rq. > > OK, so task delay delay accounting is broken because it doesn't take > migration into account. > > What you've done is make it symmetric wrt enqueue, and account it like > > cpu0 cpu1 > > enqueue > <wait-d1> > dequeue > enqueue > <wait-d2> > run > > Where you add both d1 and d2 to the run_delay,.. right? > Thanks for reviewing the patch. The above is exactly what I have done. > This seems like a good fix, however it looks like the patch will break > compilation in !CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS && !CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT, of it > failing to provide a stub for sched_info_dequeue() in that case. Fixed. Pl. find the new patch below. Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: David Bahi <DBahi@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-04sched: add avg-overlap support to RT tasksGregory Haskins
We have the notion of tracking process-coupling (a.k.a. buddy-wake) via the p->se.last_wake / p->se.avg_overlap facilities, but it is only used for cfs to cfs interactions. There is no reason why an rt to cfs interaction cannot share in establishing a relationhip in a similar manner. Because PREEMPT_RT runs many kernel threads as FIFO priority, we often times have heavy interaction between RT threads waking CFS applications. This patch offers a substantial boost (50-60%+) in perfomance under those circumstances. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: npiggin@suse.de Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-04sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved overGregory Haskins
Inspired by Peter Zijlstra. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: npiggin@suse.de Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-01sched: fix divide error when trying to configure rt_period to zeroRaistlin
Here it is another little Oops we found while configuring invalid values via cgroups: echo 0 > /dev/cgroups/0/cpu.rt_period_us or echo 4294967296 > /dev/cgroups/0/cpu.rt_period_us [ 205.509825] divide error: 0000 [#1] [ 205.510151] Modules linked in: [ 205.510151] [ 205.510151] Pid: 2339, comm: bash Not tainted (2.6.26-rc8 #33) [ 205.510151] EIP: 0060:[<c030c6ef>] EFLAGS: 00000293 CPU: 0 [ 205.510151] EIP is at div64_u64+0x5f/0x70 [ 205.510151] EAX: 0000389f EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 205.510151] ESI: d9800000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c6cede60 ESP: c6cede50 [ 205.510151] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 205.510151] Process bash (pid: 2339, ti=c6cec000 task=c79be370 task.ti=c6cec000) [ 205.510151] Stack: d9800000 0000389f c05971a0 d9800000 c6cedeb4 c0214dbd 00000000 00000000 [ 205.510151] c6cede88 c0242bd8 c05377c0 c7a41b40 00000000 00000000 00000000 c05971a0 [ 205.510151] c780ed20 c7508494 c7a41b40 00000000 00000002 c6cedebc c05971a0 ffffffea [ 205.510151] Call Trace: [ 205.510151] [<c0214dbd>] ? __rt_schedulable+0x1cd/0x240 [ 205.510151] [<c0242bd8>] ? cgroup_file_open+0x18/0xe0 [ 205.510151] [<c0214fe4>] ? tg_set_bandwidth+0xa4/0xf0 [ 205.510151] [<c0215066>] ? sched_group_set_rt_period+0x36/0x50 [ 205.510151] [<c021508e>] ? cpu_rt_period_write_uint+0xe/0x10 [ 205.510151] [<c0242dc5>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x125/0x160 [ 205.510151] [<c0232c15>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x155/0x190 [ 205.510151] [<c02f047f>] ? security_file_permission+0xf/0x20 [ 205.510151] [<c0277ad8>] ? rw_verify_area+0x48/0xc0 [ 205.510151] [<c0283744>] ? dupfd+0x104/0x130 [ 205.510151] [<c027838c>] ? vfs_write+0x9c/0x160 [ 205.510151] [<c0242ca0>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x0/0x160 [ 205.510151] [<c027850d>] ? sys_write+0x3d/0x70 [ 205.510151] [<c0203019>] ? sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0x91 [ 205.510151] ======================= [ 205.510151] Code: 0f 45 de 31 f6 0f ad d0 d3 ea f6 c1 20 0f 45 c2 0f 45 d6 89 45 f0 89 55 f4 8b 55 f4 31 c9 8b 45 f0 39 d3 89 c6 77 08 89 d0 31 d2 <f7> f3 89 c1 83 c4 08 89 f0 f7 f3 89 ca 5b 5e 5d c3 55 89 e5 56 [ 205.510151] EIP: [<c030c6ef>] div64_u64+0x5f/0x70 SS:ESP 0068:c6cede50 The attached patch solves the issue for me. I'm checking as soon as possible for the period not being zero since, if it is, going ahead is useless. This way we also save a mutex_lock() and a read_lock() wrt doing it inside tg_set_bandwidth() or __rt_schedulable(). Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-30sched: fix warningVegard Nossum
This patch fixes the following warning: kernel/sched.c:1667: warning: 'cfs_rq_set_shares' defined but not used This seems the correct way to fix this; cfs_rq_set_shares() is only used in a single place, which is also inside #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-30sched: build fixIngo Molnar
fix: kernel/sched.c: In function ‘sched_group_set_shares': kernel/sched.c:8635: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cfs_rq_set_shares' Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-29sched: fix cpu hotplugDmitry Adamushko
the CPU hotplug problems (crashes under high-volume unplug+replug tests) seem to be related to migrate_dead_tasks(). Firstly I added traces to see all tasks being migrated with migrate_live_tasks() and migrate_dead_tasks(). On my setup the problem pops up (the one with "se == NULL" in the loop of pick_next_task_fair()) shortly after the traces indicate that some has been migrated with migrate_dead_tasks()). btw., I can reproduce it much faster now with just a plain cpu down/up loop. [disclaimer] Well, unless I'm really missing something important in this late hour [/desclaimer] pick_next_task() is not something appropriate for migrate_dead_tasks() :-) the following change seems to eliminate the problem on my setup (although, I kept it running only for a few minutes to get a few messages indicating migrate_dead_tasks() does move tasks and the system is still ok) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: incremental effective_load()Peter Zijlstra
Increase the accuracy of the effective_load values. Not only consider the current increment (as per the attempted wakeup), but also consider the delta between when we last adjusted the shares and the current situation. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: correct wakeup weight calculationsPeter Zijlstra
rw_i = {2, 4, 1, 0} s_i = {2/7, 4/7, 1/7, 0} wakeup on cpu0, weight=1 rw'_i = {3, 4, 1, 0} s'_i = {3/8, 4/8, 1/8, 0} s_0 = S * rw_0 / \Sum rw_j -> \Sum rw_j = S*rw_0/s_0 = 1*2*7/2 = 7 (correct) s'_0 = S * (rw_0 + 1) / (\Sum rw_j + 1) = 1 * (2+1) / (7+1) = 3/8 (correct so we find that adding 1 to cpu0 gains 5/56 in weight if say the other cpu were, cpu1, we'd also have to calculate its 4/56 loss Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: update shares on wakeupPeter Zijlstra
We found that the affine wakeup code needs rather accurate load figures to be effective. The trouble is that updating the load figures is fairly expensive with group scheduling. Therefore ratelimit the updating. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: fix shares boost logicPeter Zijlstra
In case the domain is empty, pretend there is a single task on each cpu, so that together with the boost logic we end up giving 1/n shares to each cpu. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: disable source/target_load biasPeter Zijlstra
The bias given by source/target_load functions can be very large, disable it by default to get faster convergence. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: remove prio preference from balance decisionsPeter Zijlstra
Priority looses much of its meaning in a hierarchical context. So don't use it in balance decisions. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: hierarchical load vs find_busiest_groupPeter Zijlstra
find_busiest_group() has some assumptions about task weight being in the NICE_0_LOAD range. Hierarchical task groups break this assumption - fix this by replacing it with the average task weight, which will adapt the situation. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: persistent average load per taskPeter Zijlstra
Remove the fall-back to SCHED_LOAD_SCALE by remembering the previous value of cpu_avg_load_per_task() - this is useful because of the hierarchical group model in which task weight can be much smaller. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: fix sched_balance_self() smp group balancingPeter Zijlstra
Finding the least idle cpu is more accurate when done with updated shares. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: fix newidle smp group balancingPeter Zijlstra
Re-compute the shares on newidle - so we can make a decision based on recent data. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: simplify the group load balancerPeter Zijlstra
While thinking about the previous patch - I realized that using per domain aggregate load values in load_balance_fair() is wrong. We should use the load value for that CPU. By not needing per domain hierarchical load values we don't need to store per domain aggregate shares, which greatly simplifies all the math. It basically falls apart in two separate computations: - per domain update of the shares - per CPU update of the hierarchical load Also get rid of the move_group_shares() stuff - just re-compute the shares again after a successful load balance. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: no need to aggregate task_weightPeter Zijlstra
We only need to know the task_weight of the busiest rq - nothing to do if there are no tasks there. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: dont micro manage share lossesPeter Zijlstra
We used to try and contain the loss of 'shares' by playing arithmetic games. Replace that by noticing that at the top sched_domain we'll always have the full weight in shares to distribute. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: update aggregate when holding the RQsPeter Zijlstra
It was observed that in __update_group_shares_cpu() rq_weight > aggregate()->rq_weight This is caused by forks/wakeups in between the initial aggregate pass and locking of the RQs for load balance. To avoid this situation partially re-do the aggregation once we have the RQs locked (which avoids new tasks from appearing). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: fix sched_domain aggregationPeter Zijlstra
Keeping the aggregate on the first cpu of the sched domain has two problems: - it could collide between different sched domains on different cpus - it could slow things down because of the remote accesses Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: fix wakeup granularity and buddy granularityPeter Zijlstra
Uncouple buddy selection from wakeup granularity. The initial idea was that buddies could run ahead as far as a normal task can - do this by measuring a pair 'slice' just as we do for a normal task. This means we can drop the wakeup_granularity back to 5ms. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: sched_clock_cpu() based cpu_clock()Peter Zijlstra
with sched_clock_cpu() being reasonably in sync between cpus (max 1 jiffy difference) use this to provide cpu_clock(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: revert revert of: fair-group: SMP-nice for group schedulingPeter Zijlstra
Try again.. Initial commit: 18d95a2832c1392a2d63227a7a6d433cb9f2037e Revert: 6363ca57c76b7b83639ca8c83fc285fa26a7880e Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-27sched: revert the revert of: weight calculationsPeter Zijlstra
Try again.. initial commit: 8f1bc385cfbab474db6c27b5af1e439614f3025c revert: f9305d4a0968201b2818dbed0dc8cb0d4ee7aeb3 Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-25Merge branch 'linus' into tracing/ftraceIngo Molnar
2008-06-25Merge branch 'linus' into sched/new-API-sched_setschedulerIngo Molnar
2008-06-25Merge branch 'linus' into sched/develIngo Molnar
Conflicts: kernel/sched_rt.c Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-25Merge branch 'linus' into core/softirqIngo Molnar
2008-06-23sched: add new API sched_setscheduler_nocheck: add a flag to control access ↵Rusty Russell
checks Hidehiro Kawai noticed that sched_setscheduler() can fail in stop_machine: it calls sched_setscheduler() from insmod, which can have CAP_SYS_MODULE without CAP_SYS_NICE. Two cases could have failed, so are changed to sched_setscheduler_nocheck: kernel/softirq.c:cpu_callback() - CPU hotplug callback kernel/stop_machine.c:__stop_machine_run() - Called from various places, including modprobe() Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com> Cc: Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-23Merge branch 'linus' into sched/develIngo Molnar
2008-06-23Merge branch 'linus' into tracing/ftraceIngo Molnar
2008-06-23Merge branch 'linus' into sched/urgentIngo Molnar
2008-06-23Merge branch 'linus' into core/softirqIngo Molnar
2008-06-20Merge branch 'core-fixes-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip * 'core-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip: softlockup: fix NMI hangs due to lock race - 2.6.26-rc regression rcupreempt: remove export of rcu_batches_completed_bh cpuset: limit the input of cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
2008-06-20sched: refactor wait_for_completion_timeout()Oleg Nesterov
Simplify the code and fix the boundary condition of wait_for_completion_timeout(,0). We can kill the first __remove_wait_queue() as well. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
2008-06-20sched: fix wait_for_completion_timeout() spurious failure under heavy loadRoland Dreier
It seems that the current implementaton of wait_for_completion_timeout() has a small problem under very high load for the common pattern: if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&done, timeout)) /* handle failure */ because the implementation very roughly does (lots of code deleted to show the basic flow): static inline long __sched do_wait_for_common(struct completion *x, long timeout, int state) { if (x->done) return timeout; do { timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout); if (!timeout) return timeout; } while (!x->done); return timeout; } so if the system is very busy and x->done is not set when do_wait_for_common() is entered, it is possible that the first call to schedule_timeout() returns 0 because the task doing wait_for_completion doesn't get rescheduled for a long time, even if it is woken up early enough. In this case, wait_for_completion_timeout() returns 0 without even checking x->done again, and the code above falls into its failure case purely for scheduler reasons, even if the hardware event or whatever was being waited for happened early enough. It would make sense to add an extra test to do_wait_for() in the timeout case and return 1 if x->done is actually set. A quick audit (not exhaustive) of wait_for_completion_timeout() callers seems to indicate that no one actually cares about the return value in the success case -- they just test for 0 (timed out) versus non-zero (wait succeeded). Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-20sched: rt: fix the bandwidth contraint computationsPeter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>