| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 cleanups from Borislav Petkov:
"Misc minor cleanups"
* tag 'x86_cleanups_for_v5.10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/entry: Fix typo in comments for syscall_enter_from_user_mode()
x86/resctrl: Fix spelling in user-visible warning messages
x86/entry/64: Do not include inst.h in calling.h
x86/mpparse: Remove duplicate io_apic.h include
|
|
Just to help myself and others with finding the correct function names,
fix a typo for "usermode" vs "user_mode".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200919080936.259819-1-keescook@chromium.org
|
|
On v5.8 when doing seccomp syscall rewrites (e.g. getpid into getppid
as seen in the seccomp selftests), trace (and audit) correctly see the
rewritten syscall on entry and exit:
seccomp_bpf-1307 [000] .... 22974.874393: sys_enter: NR 110 (...
seccomp_bpf-1307 [000] .N.. 22974.874401: sys_exit: NR 110 = 1304
With mainline we see a mismatched enter and exit (the original syscall
is incorrectly visible on entry):
seccomp_bpf-1030 [000] .... 21.806766: sys_enter: NR 39 (...
seccomp_bpf-1030 [000] .... 21.806767: sys_exit: NR 110 = 1027
When ptrace or seccomp change the syscall, this needs to be visible to
trace and audit at that time as well. Update the syscall earlier so they
see the correct value.
Fixes: d88d59b64ca3 ("core/entry: Respect syscall number rewrites")
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200912005826.586171-1-keescook@chromium.org
|
|
Andy reported that the syscall treacing for 32bit fast syscall fails:
# ./tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall_32
...
[RUN] SYSEMU
[FAIL] Initial args are wrong (nr=224, args=10 11 12 13 14 4289172732)
...
[RUN] SYSCALL
[FAIL] Initial args are wrong (nr=29, args=0 0 0 0 0 4289172732)
The eason is that the conversion to generic entry code moved the retrieval
of the sixth argument (EBP) after the point where the syscall entry work
runs, i.e. ptrace, seccomp, audit...
Unbreak it by providing a split up version of syscall_enter_from_user_mode().
- syscall_enter_from_user_mode_prepare() establishes state and enables
interrupts
- syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work() runs the entry work
Replace the call to syscall_enter_from_user_mode() in the 32bit fast
syscall C-entry with the split functions and stick the EBP retrieval
between them.
Fixes: 27d6b4d14f5c ("x86/entry: Use generic syscall entry function")
Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0xdjbtt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
|
|
The transcript of the x86 entry code to the generic version failed to
reload the syscall number from ptregs after ptrace and seccomp have run,
which both can modify the syscall number in ptregs. It returns the original
syscall number instead which is obviously not the right thing to do.
Reload the syscall number to fix that.
Fixes: 142781e108b1 ("entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality")
Reported-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87blj6ifo8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
|
|
The noinstr attribute is to be specified before the return type in the
same way 'inline' is used.
Similar cases were recently fixed for x86 in commit 7f6fa101dfac ("x86:
Correct noinstr qualifiers"), but the generic entry code was based on the
the original version and did not carry the fix over.
Fixes: a5497bab5f72 ("entry: Provide generic interrupt entry/exit code")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200725091951.744848-3-mingo@kernel.org
|
|
Entering a guest is similar to exiting to user space. Pending work like
handling signals, rescheduling, task work etc. needs to be handled before
that.
Provide generic infrastructure to avoid duplication of the same handling
code all over the place.
The transfer to guest mode handling is different from the exit to usermode
handling, e.g. vs. rseq and live patching, so a separate function is used.
The initial list of work items handled is:
TIF_SIGPENDING, TIF_NEED_RESCHED, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
Architecture specific TIF flags can be added via defines in the
architecture specific include files.
The calling convention is also different from the syscall/interrupt entry
functions as KVM invokes this from the outer vcpu_run() loop with
interrupts and preemption enabled. To prevent missing a pending work item
it invokes a check for pending TIF work from interrupt disabled code right
before transitioning to guest mode. The lockdep, RCU and tracing state
handling is also done directly around the switch to and from guest mode.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200722220519.833296398@linutronix.de
|
|
Like the syscall entry/exit code interrupt/exception entry after the real
low level ASM bits should not be different accross architectures.
Provide a generic version based on the x86 code.
irqentry_enter() is called after the low level entry code and
irqentry_exit() must be invoked right before returning to the low level
code which just contains the actual return logic. The code before
irqentry_enter() and irqentry_exit() must not be instrumented. Code after
irqentry_enter() and before irqentry_exit() can be instrumented.
irqentry_enter() invokes irqentry_enter_from_user_mode() if the
interrupt/exception came from user mode. If if entered from kernel mode it
handles the kernel mode variant of establishing state for lockdep, RCU and
tracing depending on the kernel context it interrupted (idle, non-idle).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200722220519.723703209@linutronix.de
|
|
Like syscall entry all architectures have similar and pointlessly different
code to handle pending work before returning from a syscall to user space.
1) One-time syscall exit work:
- rseq syscall exit
- audit
- syscall tracing
- tracehook (single stepping)
2) Preparatory work
- Exit to user mode loop (common TIF handling).
- Architecture specific one time work arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare()
- Address limit and lockdep checks
3) Final transition (lockdep, tracing, context tracking, RCU). Invokes
arch_exit_to_user_mode() to handle e.g. speculation mitigations
Provide a generic version based on the x86 code which has all the RCU and
instrumentation protections right.
Provide a variant for interrupt return to user mode as well which shares
the above #2 and #3 work items.
After syscall_exit_to_user_mode() and irqentry_exit_to_user_mode() the
architecture code just has to return to user space. The code after
returning from these functions must not be instrumented.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200722220519.613977173@linutronix.de
|
|
On syscall entry certain work needs to be done:
- Establish state (lockdep, context tracking, tracing)
- Conditional work (ptrace, seccomp, audit...)
This code is needlessly duplicated and different in all
architectures.
Provide a generic version based on the x86 implementation which has all the
RCU and instrumentation bits right.
As interrupt/exception entry from user space needs parts of the same
functionality, provide a function for this as well.
syscall_enter_from_user_mode() and irqentry_enter_from_user_mode() must be
called right after the low level ASM entry. The calling code must be
non-instrumentable. After the functions returns state is correct and the
subsequent functions can be instrumented.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200722220519.513463269@linutronix.de
|
