summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/drm/drm_file.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-28the rest of drivers/*: annotate ->poll() instancesAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-06-14drm: introduce sync objects (v4)Dave Airlie
Sync objects are new toplevel drm object, that contain a pointer to a fence. This fence can be updated via command submission ioctls via drivers. There is also a generic wait obj API modelled on the vulkan wait API (with code modelled on some amdgpu code). These objects can be converted to an opaque fd that can be passes between processes. v2: rename reference/unreference to put/get (Chris) fix leaked reference (David Zhou) drop mutex in favour of cmpxchg (Chris) v3: cleanups from danvet, rebase on drm_fops rename check fd_flags is 0 in ioctls. v4: export find/free, change replace fence to take a syncobj. In order to support lookup first, replace later semantics which seem in the end to be cleaner. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2017-06-01drm: Extract drm_vblank.[hc]Daniel Vetter
drm_irq.c contains both the irq helper library (optional) and the vblank support (optional, but part of the modeset uapi, and doesn't require the use of the irq helpers at all. Split this up for more clarity of the scope of the individual bits. v2: Move misplaced hunks to this patch (Stefan). Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170531092146.12528-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2017-03-14drm/doc: Document drm_file.[hc]Daniel Vetter
Well, mostly drm_file.h, and clean up all related things: - I didnt' figure out the difference between preclose and postclose. The existing explanation in drm-internals.rst didn't convince me, since it's also really outdated - we clean up pending DRM events in the core nowadays. I put a FIXME in for the future. - Another FIXME is to have a macro for default fops. - Lots of links all around, main areas are to tie the overview in drm_file.c more into the callbacks in struct drm_device, and the other is to link render/primary node code to the right sections in drm-uapi.rst. - Also moved the open/close stuff to drm_drv.h from drm-internals.rst, seems like the better place for that information. Since that section was rather outdated this amounted to full-on rewrite. A big missing piece here is some overview graph, but I think better to wait with that one until drm_device and drm_driver are also fully documented. v2: Nits from Sean. Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-12-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2017-03-14drm: Remove drm_pending_event->pidDaniel Vetter
We might as well dump the drm_file pointer, that's about as useful a cookie as the pid. Noticed while typing docs for drm_file and friends. Since the only consumer of this is the tracepoints I think we can safely change this - those tracepoints should not be uapi relevant at all. It all goes back to commit b9c2c9ae882f058084e13e339925dbf8d2d20271 Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Date: Thu Jul 1 16:48:09 2010 -0700 drm: add per-event vblank event trace points which doesn't give a special justification for using pid over a pointer. Also note that the nouveau code setting it is entirely pointless: Since this isn't a vblank event, it will never hit the vblank tracepoints. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-11-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2017-03-09drm: Extract drm_file.hDaniel Vetter
I'm torn on whether drm_minor really should be here or somewhere else. Maybe with more clarity after untangling drmP.h more this is easier to decide, for now I've put a FIXME comment right next to it. Right now we need struct drm_minor for the inline drm_file type helpers, and so it does kinda make sense to have them here. Next patch will kerneldoc-ify the entire pile. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch