summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-04-12ext4 crypto: add ext4 encryption facilitiesMichael Halcrow
On encrypt, we will re-assign the buffer_heads to point to a bounce page rather than the control_page (which is the original page to write that contains the plaintext). The block I/O occurs against the bounce page. On write completion, we re-assign the buffer_heads to the original plaintext page. On decrypt, we will attach a read completion callback to the bio struct. This read completion will decrypt the read contents in-place prior to setting the page up-to-date. The current encryption mode, AES-256-XTS, lacks cryptographic integrity. AES-256-GCM is in-plan, but we will need to devise a mechanism for handling the integrity data. Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ildar Muslukhov <ildarm@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2015-04-11ocfs2: use __generic_file_write_iter()Al Viro
we can do that now - all we need is to clear IOCB_DIRECT from ->ki_flags in "can't do dio" case. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11mirror O_APPEND and O_DIRECT into iocb->ki_flagsAl Viro
... avoiding write_iter/fcntl races. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11switch generic_write_checks() to iocb and iterAl Viro
... returning -E... upon error and amount of data left in iter after (possible) truncation upon success. Note, that normal case gives a non-zero (positive) return value, so any tests for != 0 _must_ be updated. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/ext4/file.c
2015-04-11ocfs2: move generic_write_checks() before the alignment checksAl Viro
Alignment checks for dio depend upon the range truncation done by generic_write_checks(). They can be done as soon as we got ocfs2_rw_lock() and that actually makes ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write() simpler. The only thing to watch out for is restoring the original count in "unlock and redo without dio" case. Position doesn't need to be restored, since we change it only in O_APPEND case and in that case it will be reassigned anyway. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11ocfs2_file_write_iter: stop messing with pposAl Viro
it's &iocb->ki_pos; no need to obfuscate. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11Merge branch 'for-linus' into for-nextAl Viro
2015-04-11udf_file_write_iter: reorder and simplifyAl Viro
it's easier to do generic_write_checks() first Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11fuse: ->direct_IO() doesn't need generic_write_checks()Al Viro
already done by caller. We used to call __fuse_direct_write(), which called generic_write_checks(); now the former got expanded, bringing the latter to the surface. It used to be called all along and calling it from there had been wrong all along... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11ext4_file_write_iter: move generic_write_checks() upAl Viro
simpler that way... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11xfs_file_aio_write_checks: switch to iocb/iov_iterAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11generic_write_checks(): drop isblk argumentAl Viro
all remaining callers are passing 0; some just obscure that fact. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11blkdev_write_iter: expand generic_file_checks() call in thereAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11lift generic_write_checks() into callers of __generic_file_write_iter()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11cifs: fold cifs_iovec_write() into the only callerAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11ntfs: move iov_iter_truncate() closer to generic_write_checks()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11new_sync_write(): discard ->ki_pos unless the return value is positiveAl Viro
That allows ->write_iter() instances much more convenient life wrt iocb->ki_pos (and fixes several filesystems with borderline POSIX violations when zero-length write succeeds and changes the current position). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11direct_IO: remove rw from a_ops->direct_IO()Omar Sandoval
Now that no one is using rw, remove it completely. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11direct_IO: use iov_iter_rw() instead of rw everywhereOmar Sandoval
The rw parameter to direct_IO is redundant with iov_iter->type, and treated slightly differently just about everywhere it's used: some users do rw & WRITE, and others do rw == WRITE where they should be doing a bitwise check. Simplify this with the new iov_iter_rw() helper, which always returns either READ or WRITE. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11Remove rw from dax_{do_,}io()Omar Sandoval
And use iov_iter_rw() instead. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11Remove rw from {,__,do_}blockdev_direct_IO()Omar Sandoval
Most filesystems call through to these at some point, so we'll start here. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11->aio_read and ->aio_write removedAl Viro
no remaining users Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11kill do_sync_read/do_sync_writeAl Viro
all remaining instances of aio_{read,write} (all 4 of them) have explicit ->read and ->write resp.; do_sync_read/do_sync_write is never called by __vfs_read/__vfs_write anymore and no other users had been left. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11fuse: use iov_iter_get_pages() for non-splice pathAl Viro
store reference to iter instead of that to iovec Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11fuse: switch to ->read_iter/->write_iterAl Viro
we just change the calling conventions here; more work to follow. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11make new_sync_{read,write}() staticAl Viro
All places outside of core VFS that checked ->read and ->write for being NULL or called the methods directly are gone now, so NULL {read,write} with non-NULL {read,write}_iter will do the right thing in all cases. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11coredump: accept any write methodAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11export __vfs_read()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11autofs: switch to __vfs_write()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11new helper: __vfs_write()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11Merge branch '9p-iov_iter' into for-nextAl Viro
2015-04-11switch hugetlbfs to ->read_iter()Al Viro
... and fix the case when the area we are asked to read crosses a hugepage boundary Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11coda: switch to ->read_iter/->write_iterAl Viro
... and request the same from the local cache - all filesystems with anything usable for that support those already. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11ncpfs: switch to ->read_iter/->write_iterAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: we are leaking glock.client_id in v9fs_file_getlock()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: switch to ->read_iter/->write_iterAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: get rid of v9fs_direct_file_read()Al Viro
do it in ->direct_IO()... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: switch p9_client_read() to passing struct iov_iter *Al Viro
... and make it loop Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: get rid of v9fs_direct_file_write()Al Viro
just handle it in ->direct_IO() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: fold v9fs_file_write_internal() into the callerAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: switch ->writepage() to direct use of p9_client_write()Al Viro
Don't mess with kmap() - just use ITER_BVEC. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-119p: switch p9_client_write() to passing it struct iov_iter *Al Viro
... and make it loop until it's done Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11aio_run_iocb(): kill dead checkAl Viro
We check if ->ki_pos is positive. However, by that point we have already done rw_verify_area(), which would have rejected such unless the file had been one of /dev/mem, /dev/kmem and /proc/kcore. All of which do not have vectored rw methods, so we would've bailed out even earlier. This check had been introduced before rw_verify_area() had been added there - in fact, it was a subset of checks done on sync paths by rw_verify_area() (back then the /dev/mem exception didn't exist at all). The rest of checks (mandatory locking, etc.) hadn't been added until later. Unfortunately, by the time the call of rw_verify_area() got added, the /dev/mem exception had already appeared, so it wasn't obvious that the older explicit check downstream had become dead code. It *is* a dead code, though, since the few files for which the exception applies do not have ->aio_{read,write}() or ->{read,write}_iter() and for them we won't reach that check anyway. What's more, even if we ever introduce vectored methods for /dev/mem and friends, they'll have to cope with negative positions anyway, since readv(2) and writev(2) are using the same checks as read(2) and write(2) - i.e. rw_verify_area(). Let's bury it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11ioctx_alloc(): remove pointless checkAl Viro
Way, way back kiocb used to be picked from arrays, so ioctx_alloc() checked for multiplication overflow when calculating the size of such array. By the time fs/aio.c went into the tree (in 2002) they were already allocated one-by-one by kmem_cache_alloc(), so that check had already become pointless. Let's bury it... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11expand __fuse_direct_write() in both callersAl Viro
it's actually shorter that way *and* later we'll want iocb in scope of generic_write_check() caller. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11fuse: switch fuse_direct_io_file_operations to ->{read,write}_iter()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11cuse: switch to iov_iterAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11Merge branch 'for-davem' into for-nextAl Viro
2015-04-11switch {compat_,}do_readv_writev() to {compat_,}import_iovec()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-04-11aio_setup_vectored_rw(): switch to {compat_,}import_iovec()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>