summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/romfs/mmap-nommu.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-01-09romfs: do not use mtd->get_unmapped_area directlyArtem Bityutskiy
Remove direct usage of mtd->get_unmapped_area. Instead, just call 'mtd_get_unmapped_area()' which will return -EOPNOTSUPP if the function is not implemented, and then test for this code. We also translate -EOPNOTSUPP to -ENOSYS because this return code is probably part of the kernel ABI which we do not want to break. Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2012-01-09mtd: introduce mtd_get_unmapped_area interfaceArtem Bityutskiy
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2011-06-27romfs: fix romfs_get_unmapped_area() argument checkBob Liu
romfs_get_unmapped_area() checks argument `len' without considering PAGE_ALIGN which will cause do_mmap_pgoff() return -EINVAL error after commit f67d9b1576c ("nommu: add page_align to mmap"). Fix the check by changing it in same way ramfs_nommu_get_unmapped_area() was changed in ramfs/file-nommu.c. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-24NOMMU: Make it possible for RomFS to use MTD devices directlyDavid Howells
Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession of the block layer - as well as using block devices. This permits RomFS: (1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly accessible by the CPU (including XIP); (2) and thus to be used when the block layer is disabled. RomFS can be configured with support just for MTD devices, just for Block devices or for both. If RomFS is configured for both, then it will treat mtdblock device files as MTD backing stores, not block layer backing stores. I tested this using a CONFIG_MMU=n CONFIG_BLOCK=n kernel running on my FRV board with a RomFS image installed on the mtdram test device. I see my test program being run XIP: # cat /proc/maps ... c0c000b0-c0c01f8c r-xs 00000000 1f:00 144 /mnt/doshm ... GDB on the kernel can be used to show that these addresses are within the set-aside RAM space. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>