| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Assertion checks in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() are known to be racy
but we don't want to be grabbing locks just for them. We thus recheck
them under b_state_lock only if it looks like they would fail. Annotate
the checks with data_race().
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210406161804.20150-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Access to journal->j_running_transaction is not protected by appropriate
lock and thus is racy. We are well aware of that and the code handles
the race properly. Just add a comment and data_race() annotation.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+30774a6acf6a2cf6d535@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210406161804.20150-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Kernel-doc markup should use this format:
identifier - description
They should not have any type before that, as otherwise
the parser won't do the right thing.
Also, some identifiers have different names between their
prototypes and the kernel-doc markup.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/72f5c6628f5f278d67625f60893ffbc2ca28d46e.1605521731.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Add missing __acquires() and __releases() annotations. Also, in an
"this should never happen" WARN_ON check, if it *does* actually
happen, we need to release j_state_lock since this function is always
supposed to release that lock. Otherwise, things will quickly grind
to a halt after the WARN_ON trips.
Fixes: 96f1e0974575 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock...")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Parameter gfp_mask in jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() is no longer
used after commit <536fc240e7147> ("jbd2: clean up
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()"), so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200620025427.1756360-6-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
If we free a metadata buffer which has been failed to async write out
in the background, the jbd2 checkpoint procedure will not detect this
failure in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), so it may lead to filesystem
inconsistency after cleanup journal tail. This patch abort the journal
if free a buffer has write_io_error flag to prevent potential further
inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200620025427.1756360-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Callers of __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() assume that the b_transaction is set. In
fact if it's not, we can end up with journal_head refcounting errors
leading to crash much later that might be very hard to track down. Add
asserts to make sure that is the case.
We also make sure that b_next_transaction is NULL in
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() since the callers expect that as well and
we should not get into that stage in this state anyway, leading to
problems later on if we do.
Tested with fstests.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617092549.6712-1-lczerner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
When reserved transaction handle is unused, we subtract its reserved
credits in __jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle() called from
jbd2_journal_stop(). However this function forgets to remove reserved
credits from transaction->t_outstanding_credits and thus the transaction
space that was reserved remains effectively leaked. The leaked
transaction space can be quite significant in some cases and leads to
unnecessarily small transactions and thus reducing throughput of the
journalling machinery. E.g. fsmark workload creating lots of 4k files
was observed to have about 20% lower throughput due to this when ext4 is
mounted with dioread_nolock mount option.
Subtract reserved credits from t_outstanding_credits as well.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8f7d89f36829 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520133119.1383-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could
be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,
LTP: starting fsync04
/dev/zero: Can't open blockdev
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
==================================================================
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2]
write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70:
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2]
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2]
(inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034
kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2]
kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68:
jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2]
jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155
jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2]
__ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4]
ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4]
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4]
ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4]
ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4]
_ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4]
__block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
__block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
__vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
vfs_write+0x103/0x260
ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
__x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
5 locks held by fsync04/25724:
#0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260
#1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4]
#2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
#3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4]
#4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2]
irq event stamp: 1407125
hardirqs last enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
softirqs last enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7
Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result
in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE().
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043111.2227-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
I found a NULL pointer dereference in ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits().
The running environment:
kernel version: 4.19
A cluster with two nodes, 5 luns mounted on two nodes, and do some
file operations like dd/fallocate/truncate/rm on every lun with storage
network disconnection.
The fallocate operation on dm-23-45 caused an null pointer dereference.
The information of NULL pointer dereference as follows:
[577992.878282] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-23-45.
[577992.878290] Aborting journal on device dm-23-45.
...
[577992.890778] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for dm-24-46.
[577992.890908] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890916] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_extend_trans:474 ERROR: status = -30
[577992.890918] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890920] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_rotate_tree_right:2500 ERROR: status = -30
[577992.890922] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890924] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_do_insert_extent:4382 ERROR: status = -30
[577992.890928] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_insert_extent:4842 ERROR: status = -30
[577992.890928] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890930] (fallocate,88392,52):ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree:4947 ERROR: status = -30
[577992.890933] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890939] __journal_remove_journal_head: freeing b_committed_data
[577992.890949] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020
[577992.890950] Mem abort info:
[577992.890951] ESR = 0x96000004
[577992.890952] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[577992.890952] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[577992.890953] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[577992.890954] Data abort info:
[577992.890955] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[577992.890956] CM = 0, WnR = 0
[577992.890958] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000f8da07a9
[577992.890960] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000
[577992.890964] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
[577992.890965] Process fallocate (pid: 88392, stack limit = 0x00000000013db2fd)
[577992.890968] CPU: 52 PID: 88392 Comm: fallocate Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W OE 4.19.36 #1
[577992.890969] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDD, BIOS 0.98 08/25/2019
[577992.890971] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
[577992.891054] pc : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
[577992.891082] lr : _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x618/0x968 [ocfs2]
[577992.891084] sp : ffff0000c8e2b810
[577992.891085] x29: ffff0000c8e2b820 x28: 0000000000000000
[577992.891087] x27: 00000000000006f3 x26: ffffa07957b02e70
[577992.891089] x25: ffff807c59d50000 x24: 00000000000006f2
[577992.891091] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff807bd39abc30
[577992.891093] x21: ffff0000811d9000 x20: ffffa07535d6a000
[577992.891097] x19: ffff000001681638 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[577992.891098] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff000080a03df0
[577992.891100] x15: ffff0000811d9708 x14: 203d207375746174
[577992.891101] x13: 73203a524f525245 x12: 20373439343a6565
[577992.891103] x11: 0000000000000038 x10: 0101010101010101
[577992.891106] x9 : ffffa07c68a85d70 x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f
[577992.891109] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000080
[577992.891110] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000002
[577992.891112] x3 : ffff000001713390 x2 : 2ff90f88b1c22f00
[577992.891114] x1 : ffff807bd39abc30 x0 : 0000000000000000
[577992.891116] Call trace:
[577992.891139] _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0x63c/0x968 [ocfs2]
[577992.891162] _ocfs2_free_clusters+0x100/0x290 [ocfs2]
[577992.891185] ocfs2_free_clusters+0x50/0x68 [ocfs2]
[577992.891206] ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree+0x198/0x5e0 [ocfs2]
[577992.891227] ocfs2_add_inode_data+0x94/0xc8 [ocfs2]
[577992.891248] ocfs2_extend_allocation+0x1bc/0x7a8 [ocfs2]
[577992.891269] ocfs2_allocate_extents+0x14c/0x338 [ocfs2]
[577992.891290] __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x3f8/0x610 [ocfs2]
[577992.891309] ocfs2_fallocate+0xe4/0x128 [ocfs2]
[577992.891316] vfs_fallocate+0x11c/0x250
[577992.891317] ksys_fallocate+0x54/0x88
[577992.891319] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x28/0x38
[577992.891323] el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[577992.891325] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[577992.891327] el0_svc+0x8/0xc
My analysis process as follows:
ocfs2_fallocate
__ocfs2_change_file_space
ocfs2_allocate_extents
ocfs2_extend_allocation
ocfs2_add_inode_data
ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree
ocfs2_insert_extent
ocfs2_do_insert_extent
ocfs2_rotate_tree_right
ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction
ocfs2_extend_trans
jbd2_journal_restart
jbd2__journal_restart
/* handle->h_transaction is NULL,
* is_handle_aborted(handle) is true
*/
handle->h_transaction = NULL;
start_this_handle
return -EROFS;
ocfs2_free_clusters
_ocfs2_free_clusters
_ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits
ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits
ocfs2_journal_access_gd
__ocfs2_journal_access
jbd2_journal_get_undo_access
/* I think jbd2_write_access_granted() will
* return true, because do_get_write_access()
* will return -EROFS.
*/
if (jbd2_write_access_granted(...)) return 0;
do_get_write_access
/* handle->h_transaction is NULL, it will
* return -EROFS here, so do_get_write_access()
* was not called.
*/
if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) return -EROFS;
/* bh2jh(group_bh) is NULL, caused NULL
pointer dereference */
undo_bg = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)
bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data;
If handle->h_transaction == NULL, then jbd2_write_access_granted()
does not really guarantee that journal_head will stay around,
not even speaking of its b_committed_data. The bh2jh(group_bh)
can be removed after ocfs2_journal_access_gd() and before call
"bh2jh(group_bh)->b_committed_data". So, we should move
is_handle_aborted() check from do_get_write_access() into
jbd2_journal_get_undo_access() and jbd2_journal_get_write_access()
before the call to jbd2_write_access_granted().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f72a623f-b3f1-381a-d91d-d22a1c83a336@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
|
|
There is no need to delay the clearing of b_modified flag to the
transaction committing time when unmapping the journalled buffer, so
just move it to the journal_unmap_buffer().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213063821.30455-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
|
|
Fix comment and remove unneccessary blank.
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200123064325.36358-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Delete the duplicated words "is" in the comments
Signed-off-by: Yan Wang <wangyan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12087f77-ab4d-c7ba-53b4-893dbf0026f0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"This merge window saw the the following new featuers added to ext4:
- Direct I/O via iomap (required the iomap-for-next branch from
Darrick as a prereq).
- Support for using dioread-nolock where the block size < page size.
- Support for encryption for file systems where the block size < page
size.
- Rework of journal credits handling so a revoke-heavy workload will
not cause the journal to run out of space.
- Replace bit-spinlocks with spinlocks in jbd2
Also included were some bug fixes and cleanups, mostly to clean up
corner cases from fuzzed file systems and error path handling"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (59 commits)
ext4: work around deleting a file with i_nlink == 0 safely
ext4: add more paranoia checking in ext4_expand_extra_isize handling
jbd2: make jbd2_handle_buffer_credits() handle reserved handles
ext4: fix a bug in ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit
ext4: bio_alloc with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM never fails
ext4: code cleanup for get_next_id
ext4: fix leak of quota reservations
ext4: remove unused variable warning in parse_options()
ext4: Enable encryption for subpage-sized blocks
fs/buffer.c: support fscrypt in block_read_full_page()
ext4: Add error handling for io_end_vec struct allocation
jbd2: Fine tune estimate of necessary descriptor blocks
jbd2: Provide trace event for handle restarts
ext4: Reserve revoke credits for freed blocks
jbd2: Make credit checking more strict
jbd2: Rename h_buffer_credits to h_total_credits
jbd2: Reserve space for revoke descriptor blocks
jbd2: Drop jbd2_space_needed()
jbd2: Account descriptor blocks into t_outstanding_credits
jbd2: Factor out common parts of stopping and restarting a handle
...
|
|
|
|
Currently we reserve j_max_transaction_buffers / 32 for transaction
descriptor blocks. Now that revoke descriptors are accounted for
separately this estimate is unnecessarily high and we can actually
compute much tighter estimate. In the common case of 32k journal blocks
and 4k blocksize this actually reduces the amount of reserved descriptor
blocks from 256 to ~25 which allows us to fit more real data into a
transaction.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-25-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Provide trace event for handle restarts to ease debugging.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-24-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Make checking of available credits in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() more
strict. There should be always enough credits in the handle to write all
potential revoke descriptors. Also we warn in case there are not enough
credits since this is a bug in the filesystem.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-22-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
The credit counter now contains both buffer and revoke descriptor block
credits. Rename to counter to h_total_credits to reflect that. No
functional change.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-21-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Extend functions for starting, extending, and restarting transaction
handles to take number of revoke records handle must be able to
accommodate. These functions then make sure transaction has enough
credits to be able to store resulting revoke descriptor blocks. Also
revoke code tracks number of revoke records created by a handle to catch
situation where some place didn't reserve enough space for revoke
records. Similarly to standard transaction credits, space for unused
reserved revoke records is released when the handle is stopped.
On the ext4 side we currently take a simplistic approach of reserving
space for 1024 revoke records for any transaction. This grows amount of
credits reserved for each handle only by a few and is enough for any
normal workload so that we don't hit warnings in jbd2. We will refine
the logic in following commits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-20-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
The function is now just a trivial wrapper returning
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. Drop it.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-19-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Currently, journal descriptor blocks were not accounted in
transaction->t_outstanding_credits and we were just leaving some slack
space in the journal for them (in jbd2_log_space_left() and
jbd2_space_needed()). This is making proper accounting (and reservation
we want to add) of descriptor blocks difficult so switch to accounting
descriptor blocks in transaction->t_outstanding_credits and just reserve
the same amount of credits in t_outstanding credits for journal
descriptor blocks when creating transaction.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-18-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
jbd2__journal_restart() has quite some code that is common with
jbd2_journal_stop(). Factor this functionality into stop_this_handle()
helper and use it from both functions. Note that this also drops
t_handle_lock protection from jbd2__journal_restart() as
jbd2_journal_stop() does the same thing without it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-17-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
When we drop last handle from a transaction and journal->j_barrier_count
> 0, jbd2_journal_stop() wakes up journal->j_wait_transaction_locked
wait queue. This looks pointless - wait for outstanding handles always
happens on journal->j_wait_updates waitqueue.
journal->j_wait_transaction_locked is used to wait for transaction state
changes and by start_this_handle() for waiting until
journal->j_barrier_count drops to 0. The first case is clearly
irrelevant here since only jbd2 thread changes transaction state. The
second case looks related but jbd2_journal_unlock_updates() is
responsible for the wakeup in this case. So just drop the wakeup.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-16-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
If a transaction is larger than journal->j_max_transaction_buffers, that
is a bug and not a trigger for transaction commit. Also the very next
attempt to start new handle will start transaction commit anyway. So
just remove the pointless check. Arguably, we could start transaction
commit whenever the transaction size is *close* to
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers. This has a potential to reduce
latency of the next jbd2_journal_start() at the cost of somewhat smaller
transactions. However for this to have any effect, it would mean that
there isn't someone already waiting in jbd2_journal_start() which means
metadata load for the fs is pretty light anyway so probably this
optimization is not worth it.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-15-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Move code in jbd2_journal_stop() around a bit. It removes some
unnecessary code duplication and will make factoring out parts common
with jbd2__journal_restart() easier.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-14-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.
A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct
buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and
DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS.
Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a
regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock
to a spinlock unconditionally.
Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the
journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's
hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit).
The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state()
inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a
buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer
which adds another level of indirection.
As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.
Fixup all locking comments as well.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
jbd2_journal_forget() jumps to 'not_jbd' branch which calls __bforget()
in cases where the buffer is clean which is pointless. In case of failed
assertion, it can be even argued that it is safer not to touch buffer's
dirty bits. Also logically it makes more sense to just jump to 'drop'
and that will make logic also simpler when we switch bh_state_lock to a
spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
We have cleared both dirty & jbddirty bits from the bh. So there's no
difference between bforget() and brelse(). Thus there's no point jumping
to no_jbd branch.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-5-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() drop
transaction's jh reference when they remove jh from a transaction. This
will be however inconvenient once we move state lock into journal_head
itself as we still need to unlock it and we'd need to grab jh reference
just for that. Move dropping of jh reference out of these functions into
the few callers.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
journal_unmap_buffer() checks first whether the buffer head is a journal.
If so it takes locks and then invokes jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head()
followed by another check whether this is journal head buffer.
The double checking is pointless.
Replace the initial check with jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head() which
alredy checks whether the buffer head is actually a journal.
Allows also early access to the journal head pointer for the upcoming
conversion of state lock to a regular spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Since the following commit:
b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release")
@nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all
lock_release() calls and friends.
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jack@suse.com
Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mark@fasheh.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: mripard@kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Cc: sean@poorly.run
Cc: st@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Since ext4/ocfs2 are using jbd2_inode dirty range scoping APIs now,
jbd2_journal_inode_add_[write|wait] are not used any more, remove them.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562977611-8412-2-git-send-email-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Acked-by: Changwei Ge <chge@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This issue was found when I use ebpf to trace every jbd2
handle's running info in dioread_nolock case.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry. The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.
The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem. This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.
We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction. We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.
This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
When failing from creating cache jbd2_inode_cache, we will destroy the
previously created cache jbd2_handle_cache twice. This patch fixes
this by moving each cache initialization/destruction to its own
separate, individual function.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
|
|
In jbd2_get_transaction, a new transaction is initialized,
and set to the j_running_transaction. No need for a return
value, so remove it.
Also, adjust some comments to match the actual operation
of this function.
Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
#define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
struct journal_head *jh;
^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
struct journal_head *jh;
^
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
We do not unmap and clear dirty flag when forgetting a buffer without
journal or does not belongs to any transaction, so the invalid dirty
data may still be written to the disk later. It's fine if the
corresponding block is never used before the next mount, and it's also
fine that we invoke clean_bdev_aliases() related functions to unmap
the block device mapping when re-allocating such freed block as data
block. But this logic is somewhat fragile and risky that may lead to
data corruption if we forget to clean bdev aliases. So, It's better to
discard dirty data during forget time.
We have been already handled all the cases of forgetting journalled
buffer, this patch deal with the remaining two cases.
- buffer is not journalled yet,
- buffer is journalled but doesn't belongs to any transaction.
We invoke __bforget() instead of __brelese() when forgetting an
un-journalled buffer in jbd2_journal_forget(). After this patch we can
remove all clean_bdev_aliases() related calls in ext4.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
Now, we capture a data corruption problem on ext4 while we're truncating
an extent index block. Imaging that if we are revoking a buffer which
has been journaled by the committing transaction, the buffer's jbddirty
flag will not be cleared in jbd2_journal_forget(), so the commit code
will set the buffer dirty flag again after refile the buffer.
fsx kjournald2
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_revoke commit phase 1~5...
jbd2_journal_forget
belongs to older transaction commit phase 6
jbddirty not clear __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
test_clear_buffer_jbddirty
mark_buffer_dirty
Finally, if the freed extent index block was allocated again as data
block by some other files, it may corrupt the file data after writing
cached pages later, such as during unmount time. (In general,
clean_bdev_aliases() related helpers should be invoked after
re-allocation to prevent the above corruption, but unfortunately we
missed it when zeroout the head of extra extent blocks in
ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()).
This patch mark buffer as freed and set j_next_transaction to the new
transaction when it already belongs to the committing transaction in
jbd2_journal_forget(), so that commit code knows it should clear dirty
bits when it is done with the buffer.
This problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/455 easily with
seeds (3246 3247 3248 3249).
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
There is a statement that is indented with spaces, replace it with
a tab.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
We can hold j_state_lock for writing at the beginning of
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() for a rather long time (reportedly for
30 ms) due cleaning revoke bits of all revoked buffers under it. The
handling of revoke tables as well as cleaning of t_reserved_list, and
checkpoint lists does not need j_state_lock for anything. It is only
needed to prevent new handles from joining the transaction. Generally
T_LOCKED transaction state prevents new handles from joining the
transaction - except for reserved handles which have to allowed to join
while we wait for other handles to complete.
To prevent reserved handles from joining the transaction while cleaning
up lists, add new transaction state T_SWITCH and watch for it when
starting reserved handles. With this we can just drop the lock for
operations that don't need it.
Reported-and-tested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Suggested-by: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Do not set the b_modified flag in block's journal head should not
until after we're sure that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadat() will not
abort with an error due to there not being enough space reserved in
the jbd2 handle.
Otherwise, future attempts to modify the buffer may lead a large
number of spurious errors and warnings.
This addresses CVE-2018-10883.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200071
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
|
|
The kmem_cache_destroy() function already checks for null pointers, so
we can remove the check at the call site.
This patch also sets jbd2_handle_cache and jbd2_inode_cache to be NULL
after freeing them in jbd2_journal_destroy_handle_cache().
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <wanglong19@meituan.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
If ext4 tries to start a reserved handle via
jbd2_journal_start_reserved(), and the journal has been aborted, this
can result in a NULL pointer dereference. This is because the fields
h_journal and h_transaction in the handle structure share the same
memory, via a union, so jbd2_journal_start_reserved() will clear
h_journal before calling start_this_handle(). If this function fails
due to an aborted handle, h_journal will still be NULL, and the call
to jbd2_journal_free_reserved() will pass a NULL journal to
sub_reserve_credits().
This can be reproduced by running "kvm-xfstests -c dioread_nolock
generic/475".
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.11
Fixes: 8f7d89f36829b ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
Sphinx emits various (26) warnings when building make target 'htmldocs'.
Currently struct definitions contain duplicate documentation, some as
kernel-docs and some as standard c89 comments. We can reduce
duplication while cleaning up the kernel docs.
Move all kernel-docs to right above each struct member. Use the set of
all existing comments (kernel-doc and c89). Add documentation for
missing struct members and function arguments.
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright
permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the
automated conversion utilities. I've added SPDX tags for the rest.
While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite
a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular
some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license,
and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite
surprising).
I've not attempted to do any license changes. Even if it is perfectly
legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should
be done with ext4 developer community discussion.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
|
Pull documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
"There has been a fair amount of activity in the docs tree this time
around. Highlights include:
- Conversion of a bunch of security documentation into RST
- The conversion of the remaining DocBook templates by The Amazing
Mauro Machine. We can now drop the entire DocBook build chain.
- The usual collection of fixes and minor updates"
* tag 'docs-4.13' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (90 commits)
scripts/kernel-doc: handle DECLARE_HASHTABLE
Documentation: atomic_ops.txt is core-api/atomic_ops.rst
Docs: clean up some DocBook loose ends
Make the main documentation title less Geocities
Docs: Use kernel-figure in vidioc-g-selection.rst
Docs: fix table problems in ras.rst
Docs: Fix breakage with Sphinx 1.5 and upper
Docs: Include the Latex "ifthen" package
doc/kokr/howto: Only send regression fixes after -rc1
docs-rst: fix broken links to dynamic-debug-howto in kernel-parameters
doc: Document suitability of IBM Verse for kernel development
Doc: fix a markup error in coding-style.rst
docs: driver-api: i2c: remove some outdated information
Documentation: DMA API: fix a typo in a function name
Docs: Insert missing space to separate link from text
doc/ko_KR/memory-barriers: Update control-dependencies example
Documentation, kbuild: fix typo "minimun" -> "minimum"
docs: Fix some formatting issues in request-key.rst
doc: ReSTify keys-trusted-encrypted.txt
doc: ReSTify keys-request-key.txt
...
|
|
When a transaction starts, start_this_handle() saves current
PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS value so that it can be restored at journal stop time.
Journal restart is a special case that calls start_this_handle() without
stopping the transaction. start_this_handle() isn't aware that the
original value is already stored so it overwrites it with current value.
For instance, a call sequence like below leaves PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS flag set
at the end:
jbd2_journal_start()
jbd2__journal_restart()
jbd2_journal_stop()
Make jbd2__journal_restart() restore the original value before calling
start_this_handle().
Fixes: 81378da64de6 ("jbd2: mark the transaction context with the scope GFP_NOFS context")
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
|
kernel-doc will try to interpret a foo() string, except if
properly escaped.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
|
