Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Fix a recent cleanup patch. noio (bypass) chain is
handled asynchronously against submit chain, therefore
inplace I/O or pagevec cannot be applied to such pages.
Add detailed comment for this as well.
Fixes: 97e86a858bc3 ("staging: erofs: tidy up decompression frontend")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190922100434.229340-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
|
|
After doing more drop_caches stress test on
our products, I found the mistake introduced by
a very recent cleanup [1].
The current rule is that "erofs_get_meta_page"
should be returned with page locked (although
it's mostly unnecessary for read-only fs after
pages are PG_uptodate), but a fix should be
done for this.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-26-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Fixes: 618f40ea026b ("erofs: use read_cache_page_gfp for erofs_get_meta_page")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190921184355.149928-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
|
|
In case of error, the function read_mapping_page() returns
ERR_PTR() not NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
should be replaced with IS_ERR().
Fixes: fe7c2423570d ("erofs: use read_mapping_page instead of sb_bread")
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190918083033.47780-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
|
|
As Christoph said [1], "I'd much prefer to just use
read_cache_page_gfp, and live with the fact that this
allocates bufferheads behind you for now. I'll try to
speed up my attempts to get rid of the buffer heads on
the block device mapping instead. "
This simplifies the code a lot and a minor thing is
"no REQ_META (e.g. for blktrace) on metadata at all..."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190903153704.GA2201@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-26-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1] [2], "Just use the slightly
more complicated 32-bit version everywhere so that
you have a single actually tested code path.
And then remove this helper. "
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125320.GA16726@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-25-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1], "This seems to be your only direct
use of buffer heads, which while not deprecated are a bit
of an ugly step child. So if you can easily avoid creating
a buffer_head dependency in a new filesystem I think you
should avoid it. "
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-24-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add prefix "erofs_" to these functions and print
sb->s_id as a prefix to erofs_{err, info} so that
the user knows which file system is affected.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-23-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1], ".. and save one
level of indentation."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-22-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1],
"vm_map_ram is supposed to generally behave better. So if
it doesn't please report that that to the arch maintainer
and linux-mm so that they can look into the issue. Having
user make choices of deep down kernel internals is just
a horrible interface.
Please talk to maintainers of other bits of the kernel
if you see issues and / or need enhancements. "
Let's redo the previous conclusion and kill the vmap
approach.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830165533.GA10909@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-21-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], "Please just use plain kmalloc
everywhere and let the normal kernel error injection code
take care of injeting any errors."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-20-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add erofs_ prefix to free_inode, alloc_inode, ...
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-19-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph pointed out [1], "
Why is there __submit_bio which really just obsfucates
what is going on? Also why is __submit_bio using
bio_set_op_attrs instead of opencode it as the comment
right next to it asks you to? "
Let's use submit_bio directly instead.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-18-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph pointed out [1],
"Why is there __erofs_get_meta_page with the two weird
booleans instead of a single erofs_get_meta_page that
gets and gfp_t for additional flags and an unsigned int
for additional bio op flags."
And since all callers can handle errors, let's kill
prio and nofail and erofs_get_inline_page() now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-17-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph pointed out [1], "erofs_grab_bio tries to
handle a bio_alloc failure, except that the function will
not actually fail due the mempool backing it."
Sorry about useless code, fix it now and
localize erofs_grab_bio [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902122016.GL15931@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-16-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1], "That is some very verbose
debug info. We usually don't add that and let
people trace the function instead. "
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-15-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph pointed out [1], "Why is the variable name
for the on-disk subperblock layout? We usually still
calls this something with sb in the name, e.g. dsb.
for disksuper block. " Let's fix it.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-14-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Fix as Christoph suggested [1] [2], "remove is_inode_fast_symlink
and just opencode it in the few places using it"
and
"Please just set the ops directly instead of obsfucating that in
a single caller, single line inline function. And please set it
instead of the normal symlink iops in the same place where you
also set those."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830163910.GB29603@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-13-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], update them all.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-12-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1] [2], update it now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902124521.GA22153@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902120548.GB15931@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-11-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], "Why is this called vnode instead
of inode? That seems like a rather odd naming for a Linux
file system."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-10-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1] "having this function seems
entirely pointless", let's kill those.
filesystem function name
ext2,f2fs,ext4,isofs,squashfs,cifs,... init_inodecache
In addition, add a necessary "rcu_barrier()" on exit_fs();
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-9-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
updates inode naming
- kill is_inode_layout_compression [1]
- kill magic underscores [2] [3]
- better naming for datamode & data_mapping_mode [3]
- better naming erofs_inode_{compact, extended} [4]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902122627.GN15931@infradead.org/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-8-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said [1], "This is only cosmetic, why
not stick to feature_compat and feature_incompat?"
In my thought, requirements means "incompatible"
instead of "feature" though.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-7-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph said, "This looks like a really obsfucated
way to write:
return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION ||
datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; "
Although I had my own consideration, it's the right way for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-6-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested "Please don't add __packed" [1],
remove all __packed except struct erofs_dirent here.
Note that all on-disk fields except struct erofs_dirent
(12 bytes with a 8-byte nid) in EROFS are naturally aligned.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-5-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], these macros are much
more readable as a function.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-4-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], on-disk format should have
explicitly assigned numbers.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-3-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Christoph suggested [1], "Please remove all the byte offset comments.
that is something that can easily be checked with gdb or pahole."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-2-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
while filling the linux inode, using switch-case statement to check
the type of inode.
switch-case statement looks more clean here.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830095615.10995-1-pratikshinde320@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Joe Perches suggested [1],
err = bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
- if (unlikely(err != PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ if (err != PAGE_SIZE) {
err = -EFAULT;
goto err_out;
}
The initial assignment to err is odd as it's not
actually an error value -E<FOO> but a int size
from a unsigned int len.
Here the return is either 0 or PAGE_SIZE.
This would be more legible to me as:
if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) != PAGE_SIZE) {
err = -EFAULT;
goto err_out;
}
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/74c4784319b40deabfbaea92468f7e3ef44f1c96.camel@perches.com/
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829171741.225219-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
As Dan Carpenter suggested [1], I have to remove
all erofs likely/unlikely annotations.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190829154346.GK23584@kadam/
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829163827.203274-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
EROFS filesystem has been merged into linux-staging for a year.
EROFS is designed to be a better solution of saving extra storage
space with guaranteed end-to-end performance for read-only files
with the help of reduced metadata, fixed-sized output compression
and decompression inplace technologies.
In the past year, EROFS was greatly improved by many people as
a staging driver, self-tested, betaed by a large number of our
internal users, successfully applied to almost all in-service
HUAWEI smartphones as the part of EMUI 9.1 and proven to be stable
enough to be moved out of staging.
EROFS is a self-contained filesystem driver. Although there are
still some TODOs to be more generic, we have a dedicated team
actively keeping on working on EROFS in order to make it better
with the evolution of Linux kernel as the other in-kernel filesystems.
As Pavel suggested, it's better to do as one commit since git
can do moves and all histories will be saved in this way.
Let's promote it from staging and enhance it more actively as
a "real" part of kernel for more wider scenarios!
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Darrick J . Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Cc: Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@huawei.com>
Cc: Fang Wei <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190822213659.5501-1-hsiangkao@aol.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|