| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The backref code is looking for a reloc_root that corresponds to the
given fs root. However any number of things could have gone wrong while
initializing that reloc_root, like ENOMEM while trying to allocate the
root itself, or EIO while trying to write the root item. This would
result in no corresponding reloc_root being in the reloc root cache, and
thus would return NULL when we do the find_reloc_root() call.
Because of this we do not want to WARN_ON(). This presumably was meant
to catch developer errors, cases where we messed up adding the reloc
root. However we can easily hit this case with error injection, and
thus should not do a WARN_ON().
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While doing error injection testing with my relocation patches I hit the
following assert:
assertion failed: list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list), in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3356
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3357!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 24351 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3+ #193
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a
RSP: 0018:ffffa09b019c7e00 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000056 RBX: ffff8f6492c18000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff8f64fbc27c60 RSI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RDI: ffff8f64fbc19050
RBP: ffff8f6483bbdc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffa09b019c7c38 R11: ffffffff85d70928 R12: ffff8f6492c18100
R13: ffff8f6492c18148 R14: ffff8f6483bbdd70 R15: dead000000000100
FS: 00007fbfda4cdc40(0000) GS:ffff8f64fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fbfda666fd0 CR3: 000000013cf66002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
Call Trace:
btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x55/0x55
close_ctree+0x2c5/0x306
? fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14/0x100
generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100
kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0
cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190
task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b1/0x1d0
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This happened because I injected an error in btrfs_cow_block() while
running the dirty block groups. When we run the dirty block groups, we
splice the list onto a local list to process. However if an error
occurs, we only cleanup the transactions dirty block group list, not any
pending block groups we have on our locally spliced list.
In fact if we fail to allocate a path in this function we'll also fail
to clean up the splice list.
Fix this by splicing the list back onto the transaction dirty block
group list so that the block groups are cleaned up. Then add a 'out'
label and have the error conditions jump to out so that the errors are
handled properly. This also has the side-effect of fixing a problem
where we would clear 'ret' on error because we unconditionally ran
btrfs_run_delayed_refs().
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When recovering a relocation, if we run into a reloc root that has 0
refs we simply add it to the reloc_control->reloc_roots list, and then
clean it up later. The problem with this is __del_reloc_root() doesn't
do anything if the root isn't in the radix tree, which in this case it
won't be because we never call __add_reloc_root() on the reloc_root.
This exit condition simply isn't correct really. During normal
operation we can remove ourselves from the rb tree and then we're meant
to clean up later at merge_reloc_roots() time, and this happens
correctly. During recovery we're depending on free_reloc_roots() to
drop our references, but we're short-circuiting.
Fix this by continuing to check if we're on the list and dropping
ourselves from the reloc_control root list and dropping our reference
appropriately. Change the corresponding BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() that
does the correct thing if we aren't in the rb tree.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Comment for processed extent end of range has an unnecessary "in",
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nigel Christian <nigel.l.christian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
My recent patch set "A variety of lock contention fixes", found here
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1608319304.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/
(Tracked in https://github.com/btrfs/linux/issues/86)
that reduce lock contention on the extent root by running delayed refs
less often resulted in a regression in generic/371. This test
fallocate()'s the fs until it's full, deletes all the files, and then
tries to fallocate() until full again.
Before these patches we would run all of the delayed refs during
flushing, and then would commit the transaction because we had plenty of
pinned space to recover in order to allocate. However my patches made
it so we weren't running the delayed refs as aggressively, which meant
that we appeared to have less pinned space when we were deciding to
commit the transaction.
We use the space_info->total_bytes_pinned to approximate how much space
we have pinned. It's approximate because if we remove a reference to an
extent we may free it, but there may be more references to it than we
know of at that point, but we account it as pinned at the creation time,
and then it's properly accounted when the delayed ref runs.
The way we account for pinned space is if the
delayed_ref_head->total_ref_mod is < 0, because that is clearly a
freeing option. However there is another case, and that is where
->total_ref_mod == 0 && ->must_insert_reserved == 1.
When we allocate a new extent, we have ->total_ref_mod == 1 and we have
->must_insert_reserved == 1. This is used to indicate that it is a
brand new extent and will need to have its extent entry added before we
modify any references on the delayed ref head. But if we subsequently
remove that extent reference, our ->total_ref_mod will be 0, and that
space will be pinned and freed. Accounting for this case properly
allows for generic/371 to pass with my delayed refs patches applied.
It's important to note that this problem exists without the referenced
patches, it just was uncovered by them.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we pass things around to figure out if we maybe freeing data
based on the state of the delayed refs head. This makes the accounting
sort of confusing and hard to follow, as it's distinctly separate from
the delayed ref heads stuff, but also depends on it entirely.
Fix this by explicitly adjusting the space_info->total_bytes_pinned in
the delayed refs code. We now have two places where we modify this
counter, once where we create the delayed and destroy the delayed refs,
and once when we pin and unpin the extents. This means there is a
slight overlap between delayed refs and the pin/unpin mechanisms, but
this is simply used by the ENOSPC infrastructure to determine if we need
to commit the transaction, so there's no adverse affect from this, we
might simply commit thinking it will give us enough space when it might
not.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Now that the btrfs' codebase is clean of almost all W=1 warnings let's
enable those checks unconditionally for the entire fs/btrfs/ and its
subdirectories to catch potential errors during development.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add some comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This fixes warning:
fs/btrfs/zoned.c:491:6: warning: variable ‘zone_size’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
491 | u64 zone_size;
which got introduced in 12659251ca5d ("btrfs: implement log-structured
superblock for ZONED mode"). We'll enable the warning by default and
want clean build until the relevant zoned patches land.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This makes the file W=1 clean and fixes the following warnings:
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'offset' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'next_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'prev_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'p_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:414: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent_ret' not described in '__etree_search'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'start_ret' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'end_ret' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1607: warning: Function parameter or member 'bits' not described in 'find_contiguous_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'tree' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'start_ret' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'end_ret' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1644: warning: Function parameter or member 'bits' not described in 'find_first_clear_extent_bit'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4187: warning: Function parameter or member 'epd' not described in 'extent_write_cache_pages'
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4187: warning: Excess function parameter 'data' description in 'extent_write_cache_pages'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
With these fixes space-info.c is clear for W=1 warnings, namely the
following ones are fixed:
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:575: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'may_commit_transaction'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:575: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in 'may_commit_transaction'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'ticket' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1231: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'handle_reserve_ticket'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'space_info' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'orig_bytes' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1315: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in '__reserve_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'root' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_rsv' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'orig_bytes' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1427: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'bytes' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1462: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_reserve_data_bytes'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_inode_rsv_release/btrfs_delalloc_release_space
Fixes following warnings:
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:205: warning: Function parameter or member 'inode' not described in 'btrfs_inode_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:205: warning: Function parameter or member 'qgroup_free' not described in 'btrfs_inode_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Function parameter or member 'reserved' not described in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Function parameter or member 'qgroup_free' not described in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
fs/btrfs/delalloc-space.c:472: warning: Excess function parameter 'release_bytes' description in 'btrfs_delalloc_release_space'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fixes fs/btrfs/inode.c:3101: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_wait_on_delayed_iputs'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fixes fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1570: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_rmap_block'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fixes fs/btrfs/discard.c:203: warning: Function parameter or member 'now' not described in 'peek_discard_list'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fixes following W=1 warnings:
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'root' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'inode' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctl' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'block_group' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'io_ctl' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1317: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in '__btrfs_write_out_cache'
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This fixes the following warnings:
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:80: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:80: warning: Function parameter or member 'nr' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'src' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'num_bytes' not described in 'btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:174: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill'
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:174: warning: Function parameter or member 'flush' not described in 'btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This fixes following W=1 warnings:
fs/btrfs/file-item.c:27: warning: Cannot understand * @inode: the inode we want to update the disk_i_size for
on line 27 - I thought it was a doc line
fs/btrfs/file-item.c:65: warning: Cannot understand * @inode - the inode we're modifying
on line 65 - I thought it was a doc line
fs/btrfs/file-item.c:91: warning: Cannot understand * @inode - the inode we're modifying
on line 91 - I thought it was a doc line
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This fixes the following compiler warnings:
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_tree' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_in' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fixes fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:399: warning: Function parameter or member
'modified' not described in 'add_extent_mapping'
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
There is a long existing bug in the last parameter of
btrfs_add_ordered_extent(), in commit 771ed689d2cd ("Btrfs: Optimize
compressed writeback and reads") back to 2008.
In that ancient commit btrfs_add_ordered_extent() expects the @type
parameter to be one of the following:
- BTRFS_ORDERED_REGULAR
- BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW
- BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC
- BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED
But we pass 0 in cow_file_range(), which means BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE.
Ironically extra check in __btrfs_add_ordered_extent() won't set the bit
if we see (type == IO_DONE || type == IO_COMPLETE), and avoid any
obvious bug.
But this still leads to regular COW ordered extent having no bit to
indicate its type in various trace events, rendering REGULAR bit
useless.
[FIX]
Change the following aspects to avoid such problem:
- Reorder btrfs_ordered_extent::flags
Now the type bits go first (REGULAR/NOCOW/PREALLCO/COMPRESSED), then
DIRECT bit, finally extra status bits like IO_DONE/COMPLETE/IOERR.
- Add extra ASSERT() for btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*()
- Remove @type parameter for btrfs_add_ordered_extent_compress()
As the only valid @type here is BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPRESSED.
- Remove the unnecessary special check for IO_DONE/COMPLETE in
__btrfs_add_ordered_extent()
This is just to make the code work, with extra ASSERT(), there are
limited values can be passed in.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fix below warnings reported by coccicheck:
./fs/btrfs/raid56.c:237:2-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing
functions is not needed.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Zygo reported the following panic when testing my error handling patches
for relocation:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/backref.c:2545!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 PID: 8472 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 14
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
Call Trace:
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup+0x4df/0x530
build_backref_tree+0x1a5/0x700
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
? release_extent_buffer+0x225/0x280
? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2a6/0xb60
? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x35/0x50
? do_relocation+0xc10/0xc10
? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x6a3/0xcb0
? free_extent_buffer.part.52+0xd7/0x140
? rb_insert_color+0x342/0x360
? add_tree_block.isra.36+0x236/0x2b0
relocate_block_group+0x2eb/0x780
? merge_reloc_roots+0x470/0x470
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x26e/0x4c0
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x52/0x120
btrfs_balance+0xe2e/0x18f0
? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
? btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x120/0x120
? lock_contended+0x620/0x6e0
? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e0/0x1e0
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1f9/0x460
btrfs_ioctl+0x24c8/0x4380
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x18/0x30
? check_chain_key+0x1f4/0x2f0
? lock_downgrade+0x3f0/0x3f0
? handle_mm_fault+0xad6/0x2150
? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags.part.50+0x6c/0x1e0
? check_flags+0x26/0x30
? lock_is_held_type+0xc3/0xf0
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1b/0x60
? do_syscall_64+0x13/0x80
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
? __fget_light+0xae/0x110
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This occurs because of this check
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&upper->rb_node))
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->upper));
As we are dropping the backref node, if we discover that our upper node
in the edge we just cleaned up isn't linked into the cache that we are
now done with this node, thus the BUG_ON().
However this is an erroneous assumption, as we will look up all the
references for a node first, and then process the pending edges. All of
the 'upper' nodes in our pending edges won't be in the cache's rb_tree
yet, because they haven't been processed. We could very well have many
edges still left to cleanup on this node.
The fact is we simply do not need this check, we can just process all of
the edges only for this node, because below this check we do the
following
if (list_empty(&upper->lower)) {
list_add_tail(&upper->lower, &cache->leaves);
upper->lowest = 1;
}
If the upper node truly isn't used yet, then we add it to the
cache->leaves list to be cleaned up later. If it is still used then the
last child node that has it linked into its node will add it to the
leaves list and then it will be cleaned up.
Fix this problem by dropping this logic altogether. With this fix I no
longer see the panic when testing with error injection in the backref
code.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While testing the error paths in relocation, I hit the following lockdep
splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.10.0-rc3+ #206 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs-balance/1571 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8cdbcc8f77d0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x43/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
btrfs_search_slot+0x248/0x890
relocate_tree_blocks+0x490/0x650
relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50
-> #1 (btrfs-csum-01){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
btrfs_search_slot+0x5ab/0x890
btrfs_del_csums+0x10b/0x3c0
__btrfs_free_extent+0x49d/0x8e0
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x283/0x11f0
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x220
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x2ba/0x520
kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50
-> #0 (&head_ref->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&head_ref->mutex --> btrfs-csum-01 --> btrfs-tree-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(btrfs-csum-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(&head_ref->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by btrfs-balance/1571:
#0: ffff8cdb89749ff8 (&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x563/0xf40
#1: ffff8cdb89748838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x156/0x300
#2: ffff8cdbc2c16650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x413/0x5c0
#3: ffff8cdbc135f538 (btrfs-treloc-01){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
#4: ffff8cdbc54adbf8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x100
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1571 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3+ #206
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
__lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150
lock_acquire+0x116/0x3e0
? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
? release_extent_buffer+0x124/0x170
btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0x156/0x3b0
walk_down_proc+0x1c3/0x280
walk_down_tree+0x64/0xe0
btrfs_drop_subtree+0x182/0x260
do_relocation+0x52e/0x660
relocate_tree_blocks+0x2ae/0x650
? add_tree_block+0x149/0x1b0
relocate_block_group+0x1ba/0x5d0
elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
? btrfs_balance+0x796/0xf40
? __kthread_parkme+0x66/0x90
? btrfs_balance+0xf40/0xf40
? balance_kthread+0x37/0x50
? kthread+0x137/0x150
? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
As you can see this is bogus, we never take another tree's lock under
the csum lock. This happens because sometimes we have to read tree
blocks from disk without knowing which root they belong to during
relocation. We defaulted to an owner of 0, which translates to an fs
tree. This is fine as all fs trees have the same class, but obviously
isn't fine if the block belongs to a COW only tree.
Thankfully COW only trees only have their owners root as a reference to
them, and since we already look up the extent information during
relocation, go ahead and check and see if this block might belong to a
COW only tree, and if so save the owner in the tree_block struct. This
allows us to read_tree_block with the proper owner, which gets rid of
this lockdep splat.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This patch will extract the code to grab an extent buffer from a page
into a helper, grab_extent_buffer_from_page().
This reduces one indent level, and provides the work place for later
expansion for subapge support.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The original comment is from the initial merge, which has several
problems:
- No holes check any more
- No inline decision is made
Update the out-of-date comment with more correct one.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The refactoring involves the following modifications:
- iosize alignment
In fact we don't really need to manually do alignment at all.
All extent maps should already be aligned, thus basic ASSERT() check
would be enough.
- redundant variables
We have extra variable like blocksize/pg_offset/end.
They are all unnecessary.
@blocksize can be replaced by sectorsize size directly, and it's only
used to verify the em start/size is aligned.
@pg_offset can be easily calculated using @cur and page_offset(page).
@end is just assigned from @page_end and never modified, use
"start + PAGE_SIZE - 1" directly and remove @page_end.
- remove some BUG_ON()s
The BUG_ON()s are for extent map, which we have tree-checker to check
on-disk extent data item and runtime check.
ASSERT() should be enough.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The parameter offset is confusing, it's supposed to be the disk bytenr
of metadata/data. Rename it to disk_bytenr and update the comment.
Also rename each offset passed to submit_extent_page() as @disk_bytenr
so they're consistent.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The refactoring involves the following modifications:
- Return bool instead of int
- Parameter update for @cached of btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending()
For btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending(), @cached is only used to
return the finished ordered extent.
Rename it to @finished_ret.
- Comment updates
* Change one stale comment
Which still refers to btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending(), but the
context is calling btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending().
* Follow the common comment style for both functions
Add more detailed descriptions for parameters and the return value
* Move the reason why test_and_set_bit() is used into the call sites
- Change how the return value is calculated
The most anti-human part of the return value is:
if (...)
ret = 1;
...
return ret == 0;
This means, when we set ret to 1, the function returns 0.
Change the local variable name to @finished, and directly return the
value of it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_dio_private::bytes is only assigned from bio::bi_iter::bi_size,
which is never larger than U32.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Following the rework in e076ab2a2ca7 ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages
instead of full inodes") the nr variable is no longer passed by
reference to start_delalloc_inodes hence it cannot change. Additionally
we are always guaranteed for it to be positive number hence it's
redundant to have it as a condition in the loop. Simply remove that
usage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's currently u64 which gets instantly translated either to LONG_MAX
(if U64_MAX is passed) or cast to an unsigned long (which is in fact,
wrong because writeback_control::nr_to_write is a signed, long type).
Just convert the function's argument to be long time which obviates the
need to manually convert u64 value to a long. Adjust all call sites
which pass U64_MAX to pass LONG_MAX. Finally ensure that in
shrink_delalloc the u64 is converted to a long without overflowing,
resulting in a negative number.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
After commit 040ee6120cb670 ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range") we do not
use anymore the data_offset field of struct backref_ctx, as after that we
do all the necessary checks for the data offset of file extent items at
clone_range(). Since there are no more users of data_offset from that
structure, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of having three 'if' to handle non-NULL return value consolidate
this in one 'if (ret)'. That way the code is more obvious:
- Always drop delete_unused_bgs_mutex if ret is not NULL
- If ret is negative -> goto done
- If it's 1 -> reset ret to 0, release the path and finish the loop.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
I noticed that shared ref entries in ref-verify didn't have the proper
owner set, which caused me to think there was something seriously wrong.
However the problem is if we have a parent we simply weren't filling out
the owner part of the reference, even though we have it.
Fix this by making sure we set all the proper fields when we modify a
reference, this way we'll have the proper owner if a problem happens and
we don't waste time thinking we're updating the wrong level.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
I noticed that sometimes I would have the wrong level printed out with
ref-verify while testing some error injection related problems. This is
because we only get the level from the main extent item, but our
references could go off the current leaf into another, and at that point
we lose our level.
Fix this by keeping track of the last tree block level that we found,
the same way we keep track of our bytenr and num_bytes, in case we
happen to wander into another leaf while still processing the references
for a bytenr.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
I was attempting to reproduce a problem that Zygo hit, but my error
injection wasn't firing for a few of the common calls to
btrfs_should_cancel_balance. This is because the compiler decided to
inline it at these spots. Keep this from happening by explicitly
marking the function as noinline so that error injection will always
work.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The following patches are going to address error handling in relocation,
in order to test those patches I need to be able to inject errors in
btrfs_search_slot and btrfs_cow_block, as we call both of these pretty
often in different cases during relocation.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's no longer used. While at it also remove new_dirid in create_subvol
as it's used in a single place and open code it. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Adjust the way free_objectid is being initialized, it now stores
BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID rather than the, somewhat arbitrary,
BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID - 1. This change also has the added benefit
that now it becomes unnecessary to explicitly initialize free_objectid
for a newly create fs root.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This reflects the true purpose of the member as it's being used solely
in context where a new objectid is being allocated. Future changes will
also change the way it's being used to closely follow this semantics.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This better reflects the semantics of the function i.e no search is
performed whatsoever.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function is used to initialize the in-memory
btrfs_root::highest_objectid member, which is used to get an available
objectid. Rename it to better reflect its semantics.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
First replace all inode instances with a pointer to btrfs_inode. This
removes multiple invocations of the BTRFS_I macro, subsequently remove
2 local variables as they are called only once and simply refer to
them directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Return value in __load_free_space_cache is not properly set after
(unlikely) memory allocation failures and 0 is returned instead.
This is not a problem for the caller load_free_space_cache because only
value 1 is considered as 'cache loaded' but for clarity it's better
to set the errors accordingly.
Fixes: a67509c30079 ("Btrfs: add a io_ctl struct and helpers for dealing with the space cache")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While doing error injection I would sometimes get a corrupt file system.
This is because I was injecting errors at btrfs_search_slot, but would
only do it one time per stack. This uncovered a problem in
commit_fs_roots, where if we get an error we would just break. However
we're in a nested loop, the first loop being a loop to find all the
dirty fs roots, and then subsequent root updates would succeed clearing
the error value.
This isn't likely to happen in real scenarios, however we could
potentially get a random ENOMEM once and then not again, and we'd end up
with a corrupted file system. Fix this by moving the error checking
around a bit to the main loop, as this is the only place where something
will fail, and return the error as soon as it occurs.
With this patch my reproducer no longer corrupts the file system.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A few more fixes for a late rc:
- fix lockdep complaint on 32bit arches and also remove an unsafe
memory use due to device vs filesystem lifetime
- two fixes for free space tree:
* race during log replay and cache rebuild, now more likely to
happen due to changes in this dev cycle
* possible free space tree corruption with online conversion
during initial tree population"
* tag 'for-5.11-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix log replay failure due to race with space cache rebuild
btrfs: fix lockdep warning due to seqcount_mutex on 32bit arch
btrfs: fix possible free space tree corruption with online conversion
|
|
After a sudden power failure we may end up with a space cache on disk that
is not valid and needs to be rebuilt from scratch.
If that happens, during log replay when we attempt to pin an extent buffer
from a log tree, at btrfs_pin_extent_for_log_replay(), we do not wait for
the space cache to be rebuilt through the call to:
btrfs_cache_block_group(cache, 1);
That is because that only waits for the task (work queue job) that loads
the space cache to change the cache state from BTRFS_CACHE_FAST to any
other value. That is ok when the space cache on disk exists and is valid,
but when the cache is not valid and needs to be rebuilt, it ends up
returning as soon as the cache state changes to BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED (done
at caching_thread()).
So this means that we can end up trying to unpin a range which is not yet
marked as free in the block group. This results in the call to
btrfs_remove_free_space() to return -EINVAL to
btrfs_pin_extent_for_log_replay(), which in turn makes the log replay fail
as well as mounting the filesystem. More specifically the -EINVAL comes
from free_space_cache.c:remove_from_bitmap(), because the requested range
is not marked as free space (ones in the bitmap), we have the following
condition triggered:
static noinline int remove_from_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
(...)
if (ret < 0 || search_start != *offset)
return -EINVAL;
(...)
It's the "search_start != *offset" that results in the condition being
evaluated to true.
When this happens we got the following in dmesg/syslog:
[72383.415114] BTRFS: device fsid 32b95b69-0ea9-496a-9f02-3f5a56dc9322 devid 1 transid 1432 /dev/sdb scanned by mount (3816007)
[72383.417837] BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled
[72383.418536] BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents
[72383.423846] BTRFS info (device sdb): start tree-log replay
[72383.426416] BTRFS warning (device sdb): block group 30408704 has wrong amount of free space
[72383.427686] BTRFS warning (device sdb): failed to load free space cache for block group 30408704, rebuilding it now
[72383.454291] BTRFS: error (device sdb) in btrfs_recover_log_trees:6203: errno=-22 unknown (Failed to pin buffers while recovering log root tree.)
[72383.456725] BTRFS: error (device sdb) in btrfs_replay_log:2253: errno=-22 unknown (Failed to recover log tree)
[72383.460241] BTRFS error (device sdb): open_ctree failed
We also mark the range for the extent buffer in the excluded extents io
tree. That is fine when the space cache is valid on disk and we can load
it, in which case it causes no problems.
However, for the case where we need to rebuild the space cache, because it
is either invalid or it is missing, having the extent buffer range marked
in the excluded extents io tree leads to a -EINVAL failure from the call
to btrfs_remove_free_space(), resulting in the log replay and mount to
fail. This is because by having the range marked in the excluded extents
io tree, the caching thread ends up never adding the range of the extent
buffer as free space in the block group since the calls to
add_new_free_space(), called from load_extent_tree_free(), filter out any
ranges that are marked as excluded extents.
So fix this by making sure that during log replay we wait for the caching
task to finish completely when we need to rebuild a space cache, and also
drop the need to mark the extent buffer range in the excluded extents io
tree, as well as clearing ranges from that tree at
btrfs_finish_extent_commit().
This started to happen with some frequency on large filesystems having
block groups with a lot of fragmentation since the recent commit
e747853cae3ae3 ("btrfs: load free space cache asynchronously"), but in
fact the issue has been there for years, it was just much less likely
to happen.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This effectively reverts commit d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert
data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t").
While running fstests on 32 bits test box, many tests failed because of
warnings in dmesg. One of those warnings (btrfs/003):
[66.441317] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 9251 at include/linux/seqlock.h:279 btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
[66.441446] CPU: 6 PID: 9251 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 5.11.0-rc4-custom+ #5
[66.441449] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
[66.441451] EIP: btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
[66.441472] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: c576070c EDX: c6b15803
[66.441475] ESI: 10000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c56fbcfc ESP: c56fbc70
[66.441477] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
[66.441481] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 05c8da20 CR3: 04b20000 CR4: 00350ed0
[66.441485] Call Trace:
[66.441510] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xb1/0x100 [btrfs]
[66.441529] ? btrfs_lookup_block_group+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
[66.441562] btrfs_balance+0x8ed/0x13b0 [btrfs]
[66.441586] ? btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[66.441619] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
[66.441643] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[66.441664] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[66.441683] btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x2ae0 [btrfs]
[66.441700] ? __lock_acquire+0x35f/0x2650
[66.441717] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x87/0x120
[66.441720] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd0/0x1e0
[66.441724] ? call_rcu+0x2d3/0x530
[66.441731] ? __might_fault+0x41/0x90
[66.441736] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x50
[66.441740] ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
[66.441745] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x13/0x180
[66.441750] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[66.441750] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[66.441768] __ia32_sys_ioctl+0x165/0x8a0
[66.441773] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
[66.441785] ? __might_fault+0x89/0x90
[66.441791] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x54/0x80
[66.441796] do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x70
[66.441801] do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20
[66.441805] entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2
[66.441808] EIP: 0xab7b5549
[66.441814] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00000003 ECX: c4009420 EDX: bfa91f5c
[66.441816] ESI: 00000003 EDI: 00000001 EBP: 00000000 ESP: bfa91e98
[66.441818] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b EFLAGS: 00000292
[66.441833] irq event stamp: 42579
[66.441835] hardirqs last enabled at (42585): [<c60eb065>] console_unlock+0x495/0x590
[66.441838] hardirqs last disabled at (42590): [<c60eafd5>] console_unlock+0x405/0x590
[66.441840] softirqs last enabled at (41698): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60
[66.441843] softirqs last disabled at (41681): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60
========================================================================
btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0:
__seqprop_mutex_assert at linux/./include/linux/seqlock.h:279
(inlined by) btrfs_device_set_bytes_used at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.h:212
(inlined by) btrfs_remove_chunk at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2994
========================================================================
The warning is produced by lockdep_assert_held() in
__seqprop_mutex_assert() if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled.
And "olumes.c:2994 is btrfs_device_set_bytes_used() with mutex lock
fs_info->chunk_mutex held already.
After adding some debug prints, the cause was found that many
__alloc_device() are called with NULL @fs_info (during scanning ioctl).
Inside the function, btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is expanded to
seqcount_mutex_init(). In this scenario, its second
parameter info->chunk_mutex is &NULL->chunk_mutex which equals
to offsetof(struct btrfs_fs_info, chunk_mutex) unexpectedly. Thus,
seqcount_mutex_init() is called in wrong way. And later
btrfs_device_get/set helpers trigger lockdep warnings.
The device and filesystem object lifetimes are different and we'd have
to synchronize initialization of the btrfs_device::data_seqcount with
the fs_info, possibly using some additional synchronization. It would
still not prevent concurrent access to the seqcount lock when it's used
for read and initialization.
Commit d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
does not mention a particular problem being fixed so revert should not
cause any harm and we'll get the lockdep warning fixed.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210139
Reported-by: Erhard F <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Fixes: d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While running btrfs/011 in a loop I would often ASSERT() while trying to
add a new free space entry that already existed, or get an EEXIST while
adding a new block to the extent tree, which is another indication of
double allocation.
This occurs because when we do the free space tree population, we create
the new root and then populate the tree and commit the transaction.
The problem is when you create a new root, the root node and commit root
node are the same. During this initial transaction commit we will run
all of the delayed refs that were paused during the free space tree
generation, and thus begin to cache block groups. While caching block
groups the caching thread will be reading from the main root for the
free space tree, so as we make allocations we'll be changing the free
space tree, which can cause us to add the same range twice which results
in either the ASSERT(ret != -EEXIST); in __btrfs_add_free_space, or in a
variety of different errors when running delayed refs because of a
double allocation.
Fix this by marking the fs_info as unsafe to load the free space tree,
and fall back on the old slow method. We could be smarter than this,
for example caching the block group while we're populating the free
space tree, but since this is a serious problem I've opted for the
simplest solution.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
