Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
virtio_device_is_legacy_only is always false now,
drop the test from virtio pci.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
As Rusty noted, we were accessing queue_enable with an incorrect width.
Switch to type-safe accessors so we don't make this mistake again in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
The spec is very clear on this:
4.1.3.1 Driver Requirements: PCI Device Layout
The driver MUST access each field using the “natural” access method,
i.e. 32-bit accesses for 32-bit fields, 16-bit accesses for 16-bit
fields and 8-bit accesses for 8-bit fields.
Add type-safe wrappers to prevent access with incorrect width.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Since PCI is little endian, 8-bit access might work, but the spec section
is very clear on this:
4.1.3.1 Driver Requirements: PCI Device Layout
The driver MUST access each field using the “natural” access method,
i.e. 32-bit accesses for 32-bit fields, 16-bit accesses for 16-bit
fields and 8-bit accesses for 8-bit fields.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
release function in modern driver is unused:
it's a left-over from when each driver had
to have its own release.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
Virtio 1.0 spec lists device config as optional.
Set get/set callbacks to NULL. Drivers can check that
and fail gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
We don't know the # of VQs that drivers are going to use so it's hard to
predict how much memory we'll need to map. However, the relevant
capability does give us an upper limit.
If that's below a page, we can reduce the number of required
mappings by mapping it all once ahead of the time.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
QEMU wants it, so why not? Trust, but verify.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
Lightly tested against qemu.
One thing *not* implemented here is separate mappings
for descriptor/avail/used rings. That's nice to have,
will be done later after we have core support.
This also exposes the PCI layout to userspace, and
adds macros for PCI layout offsets:
QEMU wants it, so why not? Trust, but verify.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|