| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This reverts commit d085eb8ce727 ("vhost: disable for OABI")
With commit "virtio: force spec specified alignment on types"
in place, we force proper alignment for all structures,
so there's no longer a reason to blacklist OABI.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
vhost is currently broken on the some ARM configs.
The reason is that the ring element addresses are passed between
components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if
guest selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences
it, then alignment assumed by the host's compiler might be
greater than the actual alignment of the pointer.
compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned.
This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a
deprecated configuration. With this OABI, compiler assumes that
all structures are 4 byte aligned - which is stronger than
virtio guarantees for available and used rings, which are
merely 2 bytes. Thus a guest without -mabi=apcs-gnu running
on top of host with -mabi=apcs-gnu will be broken.
The correct fix is to force alignment of structures - however
that is an intrusive fix that's best deferred until the next release.
We didn't previously support such ancient systems at all - this surfaced
after vdpa support prompted removing dependency of vhost on
VIRTULIZATION. So for now, let's just add something along the lines of
depends on !ARM || AEABI
to the virtio Kconfig declaration, and add a comment that it has to do
with struct member alignment.
Note: we can't make VHOST and VHOST_RING themselves have
a dependency since these are selected. Add a new symbol for that.
We should be able to drop this dependency down the road.
Fixes: 20c384f1ea1a0bc7 ("vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig")
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
If user did not configure any vdpa drivers, neither vhost
nor virtio vdpa are going to be useful. So there's no point
in prompting for these and selecting vdpa core automatically.
Simplify configuration by making virtio and vhost vdpa
drivers depend on vdpa menu entry. Once done, we no longer
need a separate menu entry, so also get rid of this.
While at it, fix up the IFC entry: VDPA->vDPA for consistency
with other places.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
|
|
set_dma_ops isn't available on all architectures:
make ARCH=um
...
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c: In function 'vdpasim_create':
>> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c:324:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_dma_ops'; did you mean 'set_groups'?
+[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
set_dma_ops(dev, &vdpasim_dma_ops);
^~~~~~~~~~~
set_groups
Disable vdpa-sim on architectures where it isn't.
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
|
We have both vhost and virtio drivers that depend on vdpa.
It's easier to locate it at a top level directory otherwise
we run into issues e.g. if vhost is built-in but virtio
is modular. Let's just move it up a level.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
