summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-01-15TTY: convert more flipping functionsJiri Slaby
Now, we start converting tty buffer functions to actually use tty_port. This will allow us to get rid of the need of tty pointer in many call sites. Only tty_port will be needed and hence no more tty_port_tty_get calls in those paths. Now 4 string flipping ones are on turn: * tty_insert_flip_string_flags * tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag * tty_prepare_flip_string * tty_prepare_flip_string_flags Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-01-15TTY: switch tty_buffer_request_room to tty_portJiri Slaby
Now, we start converting tty buffer functions to actually use tty_port. This will allow us to get rid of the need of tty pointer in many call sites. Only tty_port will be needed and hence no more tty_port_tty_get calls in those paths. Here we start with tty_buffer_request_room. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-25tty: add missing newlines to WARN_RATELIMITSasha Levin
WARN_RATELIMIT() expects the warning to end with a newline if one is needed. Not doing so results in odd looking warnings such as: [ 1339.454272] tty is NULLPid: 7147, comm: kworker/4:0 Tainted: G W 3.7.0-rc2-next-20121025-sasha-00001-g673f98e-dirty #75 Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-24TTY: Report warning when low_latency flag is wrongly usedIvo Sieben
When a driver has the low_latency flag set and uses the schedule_flip() function to initiate copying data to the line discipline, a workqueue is scheduled in but never actually flushed. This is incorrect use of the low_latency flag (driver should not support the low_latency flag, or use the tty_flip_buffer_push() function instead). Make sure a warning is reported to catch incorrect use of the low_latency flag. This patch goes with: cee4ad1ed90a0959fc29f9d30a2526e5e9522cfa Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-22TTY: move tty buffers to tty_portJiri Slaby
So this is it. The big step why we did all the work over the past kernel releases. Now everything is prepared, so nothing protects us from doing that big step. | | \ \ nnnn/^l | | | | \ / / | | | '-,.__ => \/ ,-` => | '-,.__ | O __.´´) ( .` | O __.´´) ~~~ ~~ `` ~~~ ~~ The buffers are now in the tty_port structure and we can start teaching the buffer helpers (insert char/string, flip etc.) to use tty_port instead of tty_struct all around. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-22TTY: tty_buffer, cache pointer to tty->bufJiri Slaby
During the move of tty buffers from tty_struct to tty_port, we will need to switch all users of buf to tty->port->buf. There are many functions where this is accessed directly in their code many times. Cache the tty->buf pointer in such functions now and change only single lines in each function in the next patch. Not that it is convenient for the next patch, but the code is now also more readable. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-22TTY: move TTY_FLUSH* flags to tty_portJiri Slaby
They are only TTY buffers specific. And the buffers will go to tty_port in the next patches. So to remove the need to have both tty_port and tty_struct at some places, let us move the flags to tty_port. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-10-22tty: prevent unnecessary work queue lock checking on flip buffer copyIvo Sieben
When low_latency flag is set the TTY receive flip buffer is copied to the line discipline directly instead of using a work queue in the background. Therefor only in case a workqueue is actually used for copying data to the line discipline we'll have to flush the workqueue. This prevents unnecessary spin lock/unlock on the workqueue spin lock that can cause additional scheduling overhead on a PREEMPT_RT system. On a 200 MHz AT91SAM9261 processor setup this fixes about 100us of scheduling overhead on the TTY read call. Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-04-09tty: hold lock across tty buffer finding and buffer fillingXiaobing Tu
tty_buffer_request_room is well protected, but while after it returns, it releases the port->lock. tty->buf.tail might be modified by either irq handler or other threads. The patch adds more protection by holding the lock across tty buffer finding and buffer filling. Signed-off-by: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaobing Tu <xiaobing.tu@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-06-08tty_buffer: get rid of 'seen_tail' logic in flush_to_ldiscLinus Torvalds
The flush_to_ldisc() work entry has special logic to notice when it has seen the original tail of the data queue, and it avoids continuing the flush if it sees that _original_ tail rather than the current tail. This logic can trigger in case somebody is constantly adding new data to the tty while the flushing is active - and the intent is to avoid excessive CPU usage while flushing the tty, especially as we used to do this from a softirq context which made it non-preemptible. However, since we no longer re-arm the work-queue from within itself (because that causes other trouble: see commit a5660b41af6a "tty: fix endless work loop when the buffer fills up"), this just leads to possible hung tty's (most easily seen in SMP and with a test-program that floods a pty with data - nobody seems to have reported this for any real-life situation yet). And since the workqueue isn't done from timers and softirq's any more, it's doubtful whether the CPU useage issue is really relevant any more. So just remove the logic entirely, and see if anybody ever notices. Alternatively, we might want to re-introduce the "re-arm the work" for just this case, but then we'd have to re-introduce the delayed work model or some explicit timer, which really doesn't seem worth it for this. Reported-and-tested-by: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@gmail.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-06-04Revert "tty: make receive_buf() return the amout of bytes received"Linus Torvalds
This reverts commit b1c43f82c5aa265442f82dba31ce985ebb7aa71c. It was broken in so many ways, and results in random odd pty issues. It re-introduced the buggy schedule_work() in flush_to_ldisc() that can cause endless work-loops (see commit a5660b41af6a: "tty: fix endless work loop when the buffer fills up"). It also used an "unsigned int" return value fo the ->receive_buf() function, but then made multiple functions return a negative error code, and didn't actually check for the error in the caller. And it didn't actually work at all. BenH bisected down odd tty behavior to it: "It looks like the patch is causing some major malfunctions of the X server for me, possibly related to PTYs. For example, cat'ing a large file in a gnome terminal hangs the kernel for -minutes- in a loop of what looks like flush_to_ldisc/workqueue code, (some ftrace data in the quoted bits further down). ... Some more data: It -looks- like what happens is that the flush_to_ldisc work queue entry constantly re-queues itself (because the PTY is full ?) and the workqueue thread will basically loop forver calling it without ever scheduling, thus starving the consumer process that could have emptied the PTY." which is pretty much exactly the problem we fixed in a5660b41af6a. Milton Miller pointed out the 'unsigned int' issue. Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Reported-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com> Cc: Stefan Bigler <stefan.bigler@keymile.com> Cc: Toby Gray <toby.gray@realvnc.com> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-04-22tty: make receive_buf() return the amout of bytes receivedFelipe Balbi
it makes it simpler to keep track of the amount of bytes received and simplifies how flush_to_ldisc counts the remaining bytes. It also fixes a bug of lost bytes on n_tty when flushing too many bytes via the USB serial gadget driver. Tested-by: Stefan Bigler <stefan.bigler@keymile.com> Tested-by: Toby Gray <toby.gray@realvnc.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-04-04tty: fix endless work loop when the buffer fills upLinus Torvalds
Commit f23eb2b2b285 ('tty: stop using "delayed_work" in the tty layer') ended up causing hung machines on UP with no preemption, because the work routine to flip the buffer data to the ldisc would endlessly re-arm itself if the destination buffer had filled up. With the delayed work, that only caused a timer-driving polling of the tty state every timer tick, but without the delay we just ended up with basically a busy loop instead. Stop the insane polling, and instead make the code that opens up the receive room re-schedule the buffer flip work. That's what we should have been doing anyway. This same "poll for tty room" issue is almost certainly also the cause of excessive kworker activity when idle reported by Dave Jones, who also reported "flush_to_ldisc executing 2500 times a second" back in Nov 2010: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/30/592 which is that silly flushing done every timer tick. Wasting both power and CPU for no good reason. Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-03-22tty: stop using "delayed_work" in the tty layerLinus Torvalds
Using delayed-work for tty flip buffers ends up causing us to wait for the next tick to complete some actions. That's usually not all that noticeable, but for certain latency-critical workloads it ends up being totally unacceptable. As an extreme case of this, passing a token back-and-forth over a pty will take two ticks per iteration, so even just a thousand iterations will take 8 seconds assuming a common 250Hz configuration. Avoiding the whole delayed work issue brings that ping-pong test-case down to 0.009s on my machine. In more practical terms, this latency has been a performance problem for things like dive computer simulators (simulating the serial interface using the ptys) and for other environments (Alan mentions a CP/M emulator). Reported-by: Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@telenet.be> Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-11-09tty: prevent DOS in the flush_to_ldiscJiri Olsa
There's a small window inside the flush_to_ldisc function, where the tty is unlocked and calling ldisc's receive_buf function. If in this window new buffer is added to the tty, the processing might never leave the flush_to_ldisc function. This scenario will hog the cpu, causing other tty processing starving, and making it impossible to interface the computer via tty. I was able to exploit this via pty interface by sending only control characters to the master input, causing the flush_to_ldisc to be scheduled, but never actually generate any output. To reproduce, please run multiple instances of following code. - SNIP #define _XOPEN_SOURCE #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i, slave, master = getpt(); char buf[8192]; sprintf(buf, "%s", ptsname(master)); grantpt(master); unlockpt(master); slave = open(buf, O_RDWR); if (slave < 0) { perror("open slave failed"); return 1; } for(i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++) buf[i] = rand() % 32; while(1) { write(master, buf, sizeof(buf)); } return 0; } - SNIP The attached patch (based on -next tree) fixes this by checking on the tty buffer tail. Once it's reached, the current work is rescheduled and another could run. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-11-05TTY: create drivers/tty and move the tty core files thereGreg Kroah-Hartman
The tty code should be in its own subdirectory and not in the char driver with all of the cruft that is currently there. Based on work done by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>