summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_msr.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-03-18powercap: Add Hygon Fam18h RAPL supportPu Wen
Enable Hygon Fam18h RAPL support for the power capping framework. Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-11-10powercap: Add AMD Fam17h RAPL supportVictor Ding
Enable AMD Fam17h RAPL support for the power capping framework. The support is as per AMD Fam17h Model31h (Zen2) and model 00-ffh (Zen1) PPR. Tested by comparing the results of following two sysfs entries and the values directly read from corresponding MSRs via /dev/cpu/[x]/msr: /sys/class/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-rapl:0/energy_uj /sys/class/powercap/intel-rapl/intel-rapl:0/intel-rapl:0:0/energy_uj Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@google.com> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-11-10powercap/intel_rapl_msr: Convert rapl_msr_priv into pointerVictor Ding
Changes the static struct rapl_msr_priv to a pointer to allow using a different RAPL MSR interface, preparing for supporting AMD's RAPL MSR interface. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@google.com> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-10-16powercap/intel_rapl: enumerate Psys RAPL domain together with package RAPL ↵Zhang Rui
domain On multi-package systems, the Psys MSR is only valid for CPUs on specific package (master package). The current code makes the assumption that package 0 is the master package, but this is not true on new platforms like SPR. Fix the problem by emuerating the Psys RAPL domain for every package, so CPUs in slave packages will read 0 for the Psys energy counter and only CPUs in master packages can get a valid reading and register the Psys RAPL domain. The sysfs I/F for the Psys RAPL domain is not changed. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-07-27powercap: Add Power Limit4 supportSumeet Pawnikar
Modern Intel Mobile platforms support power limit4 (PL4), which is the SoC package level maximum power limit (in Watts). It can be used to preemptively limits potential SoC power to prevent power spikes from tripping the power adapter and battery over-current protection. This patch enables this feature by exposing package level peak power capping control to userspace via RAPL sysfs interface. With this, application like DTPF can modify PL4 power limit, the similar way of other package power limit (PL1). As this feature is not tested on previous generations, here it is enabled only for the platform that has been verified to work, for safety concerns. Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-11intel_rapl: Fix module autoloading issueZhang Rui
intel_rapl driver used to have a list of cpuids, which is used to 1. check if the processor support RAPL MSRs 2. do some cpu model specific setting 3. module autoloading Now, the cpu model specific setting are moved to intel_rapl_common.c as part of the common code, because the setup is also needed by RAPL MMIO interface on those platforms. But removing the cpuid list from intel_rapl MSR interface driver results in that the driver can not be loaded automatically. Maintaining another copy of the cpuid list in intel_rapl_msr.c does not make sense because it increases the complexity when enabling RAPL support on a new cpu model. Fix the problem by creating an "intel_rapl_msr" platform device in the common code, and make RAPL MSR interface driver (intel_rapl_msr.c) probe the platform device directly. Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-11intel_rapl: support two power limits for every RAPL domainZhang Rui
RAPL MSR interface supports 2 power limits for package domain, and 1 power limit for other domains, while RAPL MMIO interface supports 2 power limits for both package and dram domains. And when 2 power limits are supported, the FW_LOCK bit is in bit 63 of the register, instead of bit 31. Remove the assumption that only pakcage domain supports 2 power limits. And allow the RAPL interface driver to specify the number of power limits supported, for every single RAPL domain it owns.. Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-11intel_rapl: support 64 bit registerZhang Rui
RAPL MMIO interface uses 64 bit registers, thus force use 64 bit register for all the RAPL code. Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-07-11intel_rapl: abstract RAPL common codeZhang Rui
Split intel_rapl.c to intel_rapl_common.c and intel_rapl_msr.c, where intel_rapl_common.c contains the common code that can be used by both MSR and MMIO interface. intel_rapl_msr.c contains the implementation of RAPL MSR interface. Reviewed-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>