| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When one node is perform resync or recovery, other nodes
can't get resync lock and could block for a while before
it holds the lock, so we can't stop array immediately for
this scenario.
To make array could be stop quickly, we check MD_CLOSING
in dlm_lock_sync_interruptible to make us can interrupt
the lock request.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
When some node leaves cluster, then it's bitmap need to be
synced by another node, so "md*_recover" thread is triggered
for the purpose. However, with below steps. we can find tasks
hang happened either in B or C.
1. Node A create a resyncing cluster raid1, assemble it in
other two nodes (B and C).
2. stop array in B and C.
3. stop array in A.
linux44:~ # ps aux|grep md|grep D
root 5938 0.0 0.1 19852 1964 pts/0 D+ 14:52 0:00 mdadm -S md0
root 5939 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D 14:52 0:00 [md0_recover]
linux44:~ # cat /proc/5939/stack
[<ffffffffa04cf321>] dlm_lock_sync+0x71/0x90 [md_cluster]
[<ffffffffa04d0705>] recover_bitmaps+0x125/0x220 [md_cluster]
[<ffffffffa052105d>] md_thread+0x16d/0x180 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff8107ad94>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0
[<ffffffff8152a518>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
linux44:~ # cat /proc/5938/stack
[<ffffffff8107afde>] kthread_stop+0x6e/0x120
[<ffffffffa0519da0>] md_unregister_thread+0x40/0x80 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa04cfd20>] leave+0x70/0x120 [md_cluster]
[<ffffffffa0525e24>] md_cluster_stop+0x14/0x30 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa05269ab>] bitmap_free+0x14b/0x150 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa0523f3b>] do_md_stop+0x35b/0x5a0 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa0524e83>] md_ioctl+0x873/0x1590 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff81288464>] blkdev_ioctl+0x214/0x7d0
[<ffffffff811dd3dd>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x40
[<ffffffff811b92d4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2d4/0x4b0
[<ffffffff811b9538>] SyS_ioctl+0x88/0xa0
[<ffffffff8152a5c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
The problem is caused by recover_bitmaps can't reliably abort
when the thread is unregistered. So dlm_lock_sync_interruptible
is introduced to detect the thread's situation to fix the problem.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
Previously, we used completion to sync between require dlm lock
and sync_ast, however we will have to expose completion.wait
and completion.done in dlm_lock_sync_interruptible (introduced
later), it is not a common usage for completion, so convert
related things to wait queue.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
We need to use rcu_read_lock/unlock to avoid potential
race.
Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
Since DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK is used in lockres_free,
we don't need to call dlm_unlock_sync before free
lock resource.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
For dlm_unlock, we need to pass flag to dlm_unlock as the
third parameter instead of set res->flags.
Also, DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK is more suitable for dlm_unlock
since it works even the lock is on waiting or convert queue.
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
Fix to return error code -ENOMEM from the lockres_init() error
handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
We don't need to run the full path of recv_daemon
if process_recvd_msg doesn't return 0.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
The in-memory bitmap is not ready when node joins cluster,
so it doesn't make sense to make gather_all_resync_info()
called so earlier, we need to call it after the node's
bitmap is setup. Also, recv_thread could be wake up after
node joins cluster, but it could cause problem if node
receives RESYNCING message without persionality since
mddev->pers->quiesce is called in process_suspend_info.
This commit introduces a new cluster interface load_bitmaps
to fix above problems, load_bitmaps is called in bitmap_load
where bitmap and persionality are ready, and load_bitmaps
does the following tasks:
1. call gather_all_resync_info to load all the node's
bitmap info.
2. set MD_CLUSTER_ALREADY_IN_CLUSTER bit to recv_thread
could be wake up, and wake up recv_thread if there is
pending recv event.
Then ack_bast only wakes up recv_thread after IN_CLUSTER
bit is ready otherwise MD_CLUSTER_PENDING_RESYNC_EVENT is
set.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
If the node received RESYNCING message which means
another node will perform resync with the area, then
we don't want to do it again in another node.
Let's set RESYNC_MASK and clear NEEDED_MASK for the
region from old-low to new-low which has finished
syncing, and the region from old-hi to new-hi is about
to syncing, bitmap_sync_with_cluste is introduced for
the purpose.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
If a node joins the cluster while a message broadcast
is under way, a lock issue could happen as follows.
For a cluster which included two nodes, if node A is
calling __sendmsg before up-convert CR to EX on ack,
and node B released CR on ack. But if a new node C
joins the cluster and it doesn't receive the message
which A sent before, so it could hold CR on ack before
A up-convert CR to EX on ack.
So a node joining the cluster should get an EX lock on
the "token" first to ensure no broadcast is ongoing,
then release it after held CR on ack.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
The two threads need to be unregistered if a node
can't join cluster successfully.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
In recovery case, we need to set MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED
and wake up thread only if recover is not finished.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
If multiple nodes choose to attempt do resync at the same time
they need to be serialized so they don't duplicate effort. This
serialization is done by locking the 'resync' DLM lock.
Currently if a node cannot get the lock immediately it doesn't
request notification when the lock becomes available (i.e.
DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE is set), so it may not reliably find out when it
is safe to try again.
Rather than trying to arrange an async wake-up when the lock
becomes available, switch to using synchronous locking - this is
a lot easier to think about. As it is not permitted to block in
the 'raid1d' thread, move the locking to the resync thread. So
the rsync thread is forked immediately, but it blocks until the
resync lock is available. Once the lock is locked it checks again
if any resync action is needed.
A particular symptom of the current problem is that a node can
get stuck with "resync=pending" indefinitely.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
There are several places we allocate dlm_lock_resource, but not free it.
leave() need free a lock resource too (from Guoqing)
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Cc: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
|
|
1. fix unbalanced parentheses.
2. add more description about that MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCKED_ALREADY
will be cleared after set it in add_new_disk.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Communication can happen through multiple threads. It is possible that
one thread steps over another threads sequence. So, we use mutexes to
protect both the send and receive sequences.
Send communication is locked through state bit, MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK.
Communication is locked with bit manipulation in order to allow
"lock and hold" for the add operation. In case of an add operation,
if the lock is held, MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCKED_ALREADY is set.
When md_update_sb() calls metadata_update_start(), it checks
(in a single statement to avoid races), if the communication
is already locked. If yes, it merely returns zero, else it
locks the token lockresource.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Reloading of superblock must be performed under reconfig_mutex. However,
this cannot be done with md_reload_sb because it would deadlock with
the message DLM lock. So, we defer it in md_check_recovery() which is
executed by mddev->thread.
This introduces a new flag, MD_RELOAD_SB, which if set, will reload the
superblock. And good_device_nr is also added to 'struct mddev' which is
used to get the num of the good device within cluster raid.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
For clustered raid, we need to do extra actions when change
bitmap to none.
1. check if all the bitmap lock could be get or not, if yes then
we can continue the change since cluster raid is only active
in current node. Otherwise return fail and unlock the related
bitmap locks
2. set nodes to 0 and then leave cluster environment.
3. release other nodes's bitmap lock.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
The remove disk message does not need metadata_update_start(), but
can be an independent message.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
For cluster raid, if one disk couldn't be reach in one node, then
other nodes would receive the REMOVE message for the disk.
In receiving node, we can't call md_kick_rdev_from_array to remove
the disk from array synchronously since the disk might still be busy
in this node. So let's set a ClusterRemove flag on the disk, then
let the thread to do the removal job eventually.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
If a RESYNCING message with (0,0) has been sent before, do not send it
again. This avoids a resync ping pong between the nodes. We read
the bitmap lockresource's LVB to figure out the previous value
of the RESYNCING message.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
The arg isn't used, so its presence is only confusing.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
It is common practice in the kernel to leave out this case.
It isn't needed and adds little if any value.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
This patches fixes sparse warnings like incorrect type in assignment
(different base types), cast to restricted __le64.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
As cmsg.raid_slot is le32, comparing for >0 is not meaningful.
So introduce cpu-endian 'raid_slot' and only assign to cmsg.raid_slot
when we know value is valid.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
|
|
During the past test, the node occasionally received the msg which is
sent from itself, this case should not happen in theory, but it is
better to avoid it in case something wrong happened.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
Since slot will be set within _sendmsg, we can remove
the redundant code in resync_info_update.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
|
|
The receive daemon prints kernel messages for every network message
received. This would fill the kernel message log with unnecessary messages.
Remove the pr_info() messages.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
Adding the disk worked incorrectly with the new reload code. Fix it:
- No operation should be performed on rdev marked as Candidate
- After a metadata update operation, kick disk if role is 0xfffe
else clear Candidate bit and continue with the regular change check.
- Saving the mode of the lock resource to check if token lock is already
locked, because it can be called twice while adding a disk. However,
unlock_comm() must be called only once.
- add_new_disk() is called by the node initiating the --add operation.
If it needs to be canceled, call add_new_disk_cancel(). The operation
is completed by md_update_sb() which will write and unlock the
communication.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
Resync or recovery must be performed by only one node at a time.
A DLM lock resource, resync_lockres provides the mutual exclusion
so that only one node performs the recovery/resync at a time.
If a node is unable to get the resync_lockres, because recovery is
being performed by another node, it set MD_RECOVER_NEEDED so as
to schedule recovery in the future.
Remove the debug message in resync_info_update()
used during development.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
md_reload_sb is too simplistic and it explicitly needs to determine
the changes made by the writing node. However, there are multiple areas
where a simple reload could fail.
Instead, read the superblock of one of the "good" rdevs and update
the necessary information:
- read the superblock into a newly allocated page, by temporarily
swapping out rdev->sb_page and calling ->load_super.
- if that fails return
- if it succeeds, call check_sb_changes
1. iterates over list of active devices and checks the matching
dev_roles[] value.
If that is 'faulty', the device must be marked as faulty
- call md_error to mark the device as faulty. Make sure
not to set CHANGE_DEVS and wakeup mddev->thread or else
it would initiate a resync process, which is the responsibility
of the "primary" node.
- clear the Blocked bit
- Call remove_and_add_spares() to hot remove the device.
If the device is 'spare':
- call remove_and_add_spares() to get the number of spares
added in this operation.
- Reduce mddev->degraded to mark the array as not degraded.
2. reset recovery_cp
- read the rest of the rdevs to update recovery_offset. If recovery_offset
is equal to MaxSector, call spare_active() to set it In_sync
This required that recovery_offset be initialized to MaxSector, as
opposed to zero so as to communicate the end of sync for a rdev.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
When the suspended_area is deleted, the suspended processes
must be woken up in order to complete their I/O.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
|
|
Previously, BITMAP_NEEDS_SYNC message is sent when the resyc
aborts, but it could abort for different reasons, and not all
of reasons require another node to take over the resync ownship.
It is better make BITMAP_NEEDS_SYNC message only be sent when
the node is leaving cluster with dirty bitmap. And we also need
to ensure dlm connection is ok.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Suspending the entire device for resync could take too long. Resync
in small chunks.
cluster's resync window (32M) is maintained in r1conf as
cluster_sync_low and cluster_sync_high and processed in
raid1's sync_request(). If the current resync is outside the cluster
resync window:
1. Set the cluster_sync_low to curr_resync_completed.
2. Check if the sync will fit in the new window, if not issue a
wait_barrier() and set cluster_sync_low to sector_nr.
3. Set cluster_sync_high to cluster_sync_low + resync_window.
4. Send a message to all nodes so they may add it in their suspension
list.
bitmap_cond_end_sync is modified to allow to force a sync inorder
to get the curr_resync_completed uptodate with the sector passed.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
process_suspend_info - which handles the RESYNCING request - must not
reply until all writes which were initiated before the request arrived,
have completed.
As a by-product, all process_* functions now take mddev as their
first arguement making it uniform.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
md_setup_cluster already calls try_module_get(), so this
try_module_get isn't needed.
Also, there is no matching module_put (except in error patch),
so this leaves an unbalanced module count.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
In gather_all_resync_info, we need to read the disk bitmap sb and
check if it needs recovery.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
Introduce MD_CLUSTER_BEGIN_JOIN_CLUSTER flag to make sure
complete(&cinfo->completion) is only be invoked when node
join cluster. Otherwise node failure could also call the
complete, and it doesn't make sense to do it.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
We also need to free the lock resource before goto out.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
The sb_lock is not used anywhere, so let's remove it.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
If the node just join the cluster, and receive the msg from other nodes
before init suspend_list, it will cause kernel crash due to NULL pointer
dereference, so move the initializations early to fix the bug.
md-cluster: Joined cluster 3578507b-e0cb-6d4f-6322-696cd7b1b10c slot 3
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
... ... ...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa0444924>] process_recvd_msg+0x2e4/0x330 [md_cluster]
[<ffffffffa0444a06>] recv_daemon+0x96/0x170 [md_cluster]
[<ffffffffa045189d>] md_thread+0x11d/0x170 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff810768c4>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0
[<ffffffff8151927c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
... ... ...
RIP [<ffffffffa0443581>] __remove_suspend_info+0x11/0xa0 [md_cluster]
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
In complicated cluster environment, it is possible that the
dlm lock couldn't be get/convert on purpose, the related err
info is added for better debug potential issue.
For lockres_free, if the lock is blocking by a lock request or
conversion request, then dlm_unlock just put it back to grant
queue, so need to ensure the lock is free finally.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
We should init completion within lockres_init, otherwise
completion could be initialized more than one time during
it's life cycle.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
There is problem with previous communication mechanism, and we got below
deadlock scenario with cluster which has 3 nodes.
Sender Receiver Receiver
token(EX)
message(EX)
writes message
downconverts message(CR)
requests ack(EX)
get message(CR) gets message(CR)
reads message reads message
requests EX on message requests EX on message
To fix this problem, we do the following changes:
1. the sender downconverts MESSAGE to CW rather than CR.
2. and the receiver request PR lock not EX lock on message.
And in case we failed to down-convert EX to CW on message, it is better to
unlock message otherthan still hold the lock.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Lidong Zhong <ldzhong@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
|
When node A stops an array while the array is doing a resync, we need
to let another node B take over the resync task.
To achieve the goal, we need the A send an explicit BITMAP_NEEDS_SYNC
message to the cluster. And the node B which received that message will
invoke __recover_slot to do resync.
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
|
