| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.o is dependent on config PL320_MBOX
which is declared as a bool. Hence the code is never going to be
modular. So using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be
somewhat misleading.
Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing. Also add an inclusion of init.h, as
that was previously implicit.
Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of subsys_initcall (which
seems to make sense for IPC code) will thus change this
registration from level 6-device to level 4-subsys (i.e. slightly
earlier). However no impact of that small difference is expected.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
|
|
The patch 30058677 "ARM / highbank: add support for pl320 IPC"
added a pl320 IPC specific header file as a generic mailbox.h.
This file has been renamed appropriately to allow the
introduction of the generic mailbox API framework.
Acked-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Avoids a section mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The pl320 IPC allows for interprocessor communication between the
highbank A9 and the EnergyCore Management Engine. The pl320 implements
a straightforward mailbox protocol.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
