summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-12-23drm/915: Parsing the missed out DTD fields from the VBTVincente Tsou
The upper bits of the vsync width, vsync offset and hsync width were not parsed from the VBT. Parse these fields in this patch. V2: Renamed lvds dvo timing structure members and code identation fix (Jani's review comments) V3: Corrected commit message, used "from the VBT" Signed-off-by: Vincente Tsou <vincente.tsou@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482430993-3265-1-git-send-email-madhav.chauhan@intel.com
2016-11-14drm/i915: Assume non-DP++ port if dvo_port is HDMI and there's no AUX ch ↵Ville Syrjälä
specified in the VBT My heuristic for detecting type 1 DVI DP++ adaptors based on the VBT port information apparently didn't survive the reality of buggy VBTs. In this particular case we have a machine with a natice HDMI port, but the VBT tells us it's a DP++ port based on its capabilities. The dvo_port information in VBT does claim that we're dealing with a HDMI port though, but we have other machines which do the same even when they actually have DP++ ports. So that piece of information alone isn't sufficient to tell the two apart. After staring at a bunch of VBTs from various machines, I have to conclude that the only other semi-reliable clue we can use is the presence of the AUX channel in the VBT. On this particular machine AUX channel is specified as zero, whereas on some of the other machines which listed the DP++ port as HDMI have a non-zero AUX channel. I've also seen VBTs which have dvo_port a DP but have a zero AUX channel. I believe those we need to treat as DP ports, so we'll limit the AUX channel check to just the cases where dvo_port is HDMI. If we encounter any more serious failures with this heuristic I think we'll have to have to throw it out entirely. But that could mean that there is a risk of type 1 DVI dongle users getting greeted by a black screen, so I'd rather not go there unless absolutely necessary. v2: Remove the duplicate PORT_A check (Daniel) Fix some typos in the commit message Cc: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@outlook.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@outlook.com> Fixes: d61992565bd3 ("drm/i915: Determine DP++ type 1 DVI adaptor presence based on VBT") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97994 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478884464-14251-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2016-06-02drm/i915: Extract physical display dimensions from VBTVille Syrjälä
The VBT has these mysterious H/V image sizes as part of the display timings. Looking at some dumps those appear to be the physical dimensions in mm. Which makes sense since the timing descriptor matches the format used by EDID detailed timing descriptor, which defines these as "H/V Addressable Video Image Size in mm". So let's use that information from the panel fixed mode to get the physical dimensions for LVDS/eDP/DSI displays. And with that we can fill out the display_info so that userspace can get at it via GetConnector. v2: Use (hi<<8)|lo instead of broken (hi<<4)+lo Handle LVDS and eDP too Cc: Stephen Just <stephenjust@gmail.com> Tested-by: Stephen Just <stephenjust@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1464685714-30507-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
2016-05-09drm/i915: Determine DP++ type 1 DVI adaptor presence based on VBTVille Syrjälä
DP dual mode type 1 DVI adaptors aren't required to implement any registers, so it's a bit hard to detect them. The best way would be to check the state of the CONFIG1 pin, but we have no way to do that. So as a last resort, check the VBT to see if the HDMI port is in fact a dual mode capable DP port. v2: Deal with VBT code reorganization Deal with DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_UNKNOWN Reduce DEVICE_TYPE_DP_DUAL_MODE_BITS a bit Accept both DP and HDMI dvo_port in VBT as my BSW at least declare its DP port as HDMI :( v3: Ignore DEVICE_TYPE_NOT_HDMI_OUTPUT (Shashank) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Reported-by: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Fixes: 7a0baa623446 ("Revert "drm/i915: Disable 12bpc hdmi for now"") Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1462362322-31278-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
2016-05-02drm/i915: Parse LFP brightness control field in VBTDeepak M
These fields in VBT indicates the PWM source which is used and also the controller number. v2 by Jani: check for out of bounds access, some renames, change default type, etc. v3 by Jani: s/INTEL_BACKLIGHT_CABC/INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DSI_DCS/ Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/eee2f7b683a081f006a7df1ddad9b20fbf53c48c.1461676337.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2016-04-06drm/i915: Update VBT fields for child devicesShubhangi Shrivastava
This patch adds new fields that are not yet added in drm code in child devices struct Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1459420907-11383-1-git-send-email-shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com
2016-03-17drm/i915: hide away VBT private data in a separate headerJani Nikula
We've been accumulating code across the driver that depends on the VBT specific structures and defines. The VBT is an uncontrollable beast. Encourage encapsulation of the VBT data by hiding the structures and defines in a private header only to be included from intel_bios.c. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1458125015-7931-7-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com