summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-06-15treewide: use PHYS_ADDR_MAX to avoid type casting ULLONG_MAXStefan Agner
With PHYS_ADDR_MAX there is now a type safe variant for all bits set. Make use of it. Patch created using a semantic patch as follows: // <smpl> @@ typedef phys_addr_t; @@ -(phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX +PHYS_ADDR_MAX // </smpl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180419214204.19322-1-stefan@agner.ch Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [arm64] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-08-21efi/arm/arm64: Add missing assignment of efi.config_tableArd Biesheuvel
The ARM EFI init code never assigns the config_table member of the efi struct, which means the sysfs device node is missing, and other in-kernel users will not work correctly. So add the missing assignment. Note that, for now, the runtime and fw_vendor members are still omitted. This is deliberate: exposing physical addresses via sysfs nodes encourages behavior that we would like to avoid on ARM (given how it is more finicky about using correct memory attributes when mapping memory in userland that may be mapped by the kernel already as well). Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818194947.19347-6-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-21efi/arm: Don't mark ACPI reclaim memory as MEMBLOCK_NOMAPArd Biesheuvel
On ARM, regions of memory that are described by UEFI as having special significance to the firmware itself are omitted from the linear mapping. This is necessary since we cannot guarantee that alternate mappings of the same physical region will use attributes that are compatible with the ones we use for the linear mapping, and aliases with mismatched attributes are prohibited by the architecture. The above does not apply to ACPI reclaim regions: such regions have no special significance to the firmware, and it is up to the OS to decide whether or not to preserve them after it has consumed their contents, and for how long, after which time the OS can use the memory in any way it likes. In the Linux case, such regions are preserved indefinitely, and are simply treated the same way as other 'reserved' memory types. Punching holes into the linear mapping causes page table fragmentation, which increases TLB pressure, and so we should avoid doing so if we can. So add a special case for regions of type EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY, and memblock_reserve() them instead of marking them MEMBLOCK_NOMAP. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818194947.19347-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-02-01efi: Make EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization common across all ↵Sai Praneeth
architectures Since EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE and EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE deal with updating memory region attributes, it makes sense to call EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization function from the same place as EFI_PROPERTIES_TABLE. This also moves the EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE initialization code to a more generic efi initialization path rather than ARM specific efi initialization. This is important because EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE will be supported by x86 as well. Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485868902-20401-4-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-18efi/arm*: Fix efi_init() error handlingYisheng Xie
There's an early memmap() leak in the efi_init() error path, fix it. Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161018143318.15673-4-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-09efi/arm64: Treat regions with WT/WC set but WB cleared as memoryArd Biesheuvel
Currently, memory regions are only recorded in the memblock memory table if they have the EFI_MEMORY_WB memory type attribute set. In case the region is of a reserved type, it is also marked as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP, which will leave it out of the linear mapping. However, memory regions may legally have the EFI_MEMORY_WT or EFI_MEMORY_WC attributes set, and the EFI_MEMORY_WB cleared, in which case the region in question is obviously backed by normal memory, but is not recorded in the memblock memory table at all. Since it would be useful to be able to identify any UEFI reported memory region using memblock_is_memory(), it makes sense to add all memory to the memblock memory table, and simply mark it as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP if it lacks the EFI_MEMORY_WB attribute. While implementing this, let's refactor the code slightly to make it easier to understand: replace is_normal_ram() with is_memory(), and make it return true for each region that has any of the WB|WT|WC bits set. (This follows the AArch64 bindings in the UEFI spec, which state that those are the attributes that map to normal memory) Also, replace is_reserve_region() with is_usable_memory(), and only invoke it if the region in question was identified as memory by is_memory() in the first place. The net result is the same (only reserved regions that are backed by memory end up in the memblock memory table with the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag set) but carried out in a more straightforward way. Finally, we remove the trailing asterisk in the EFI debug output. Keeping it clutters the code, and it serves no real purpose now that we no longer temporarily reserve BootServices code and data regions like we did in the early days of EFI support on arm64 Linux (which it inherited from the x86 implementation) Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
2016-09-09efi/arm*: esrt: Add missing call to efi_esrt_init()Ard Biesheuvel
ESRT support is built by default for all architectures that define CONFIG_EFI. However, this support was not wired up yet for ARM/arm64, since efi_esrt_init() was never called. So add the missing call. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
2016-09-09efi: Refactor efi_memmap_init_early() into arch-neutral codeMatt Fleming
Every EFI architecture apart from ia64 needs to setup the EFI memory map at efi.memmap, and the code for doing that is essentially the same across all implementations. Therefore, it makes sense to factor this out into the common code under drivers/firmware/efi/. The only slight variation is the data structure out of which we pull the initial memory map information, such as physical address, memory descriptor size and version, etc. We can address this by passing a generic data structure (struct efi_memory_map_data) as the argument to efi_memmap_init_early() which contains the minimum info required for initialising the memory map. In the process, this patch also fixes a few undesirable implementation differences: - ARM and arm64 were failing to clear the EFI_MEMMAP bit when unmapping the early EFI memory map. EFI_MEMMAP indicates whether the EFI memory map is mapped (not the regions contained within) and can be traversed. It's more correct to set the bit as soon as we memremap() the passed in EFI memmap. - Rename efi_unmmap_memmap() to efi_memmap_unmap() to adhere to the regular naming scheme. This patch also uses a read-write mapping for the memory map instead of the read-only mapping currently used on ARM and arm64. x86 needs the ability to update the memory map in-place when assigning virtual addresses to regions (efi_map_region()) and tagging regions when reserving boot services (efi_reserve_boot_services()). There's no way for the generic fake_mem code to know which mapping to use without introducing some arch-specific constant/hook, so just use read-write since read-only is of dubious value for the EFI memory map. Tested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> [kexec/kdump] Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [arm] Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
2016-06-03efi/arm: Fix the format of EFI debug messagesDennis Chen
When both EFI and memblock debugging is enabled on the kernel command line: 'efi=debug memblock=debug' .. the debug messages for early_con look the following way: [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e1050000-0x0000e105ffff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e1300000-0x0000e1300fff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e8200000-0x0000e827ffff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x008000000000-0x008001e7ffff [Runtime Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC] [ 0.000000] memblock_add: [0x00008000000000-0x00008001e7ffff] flags 0x0 early_init_dt_add_memory_arch+0x54/0x5c [ 0.000000] * ... Note the misplaced '*' line, which happened because the memblock debug message was printed while the EFI debug message was still being constructed.. This patch fixes the output to be the expected: [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e1050000-0x0000e105ffff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e1300000-0x0000e1300fff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x0000e8200000-0x0000e827ffff [Memory Mapped I/O |RUN| | | | | | | | | | |UC] [ 0.000000] efi: 0x008000000000-0x008001e7ffff [Runtime Data |RUN| | | | | | | |WB|WT|WC|UC]* [ 0.000000] memblock_add: [0x00008000000000-0x00008001e7ffff] flags 0x0 early_init_dt_add_memory_arch+0x54/0x5c ... Note how the '*' is now in the proper EFI debug message line. Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464690224-4503-3-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk [ Made the changelog more readable. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-05-16Merge tag 'arm64-upstream' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux Pull arm64 updates from Will Deacon: - virt_to_page/page_address optimisations - support for NUMA systems described using device-tree - support for hibernate/suspend-to-disk - proper support for maxcpus= command line parameter - detection and graceful handling of AArch64-only CPUs - miscellaneous cleanups and non-critical fixes * tag 'arm64-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux: (92 commits) arm64: do not enforce strict 16 byte alignment to stack pointer arm64: kernel: Fix incorrect brk randomization arm64: cpuinfo: Missing NULL terminator in compat_hwcap_str arm64: secondary_start_kernel: Remove unnecessary barrier arm64: Ensure pmd_present() returns false after pmd_mknotpresent() arm64: Replace hard-coded values in the pmd/pud_bad() macros arm64: Implement pmdp_set_access_flags() for hardware AF/DBM arm64: Fix typo in the pmdp_huge_get_and_clear() definition arm64: mm: remove unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL arm64: always use STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS arm64: kvm: Fix kvm teardown for systems using the extended idmap arm64: kaslr: increase randomization granularity arm64: kconfig: drop CONFIG_RTC_LIB dependency arm64: make ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC depend on !HIBERNATION arm64: hibernate: Refuse to hibernate if the boot cpu is offline arm64: kernel: Add support for hibernate/suspend-to-disk PM / Hibernate: Call flush_icache_range() on pages restored in-place arm64: Add new asm macro copy_page arm64: Promote KERNEL_START/KERNEL_END definitions to a header file arm64: kernel: Include _AC definition in page.h ...
2016-04-28efi/arm-init: Reserve rather than unmap the memory map for ARM as wellArd Biesheuvel
Now that ARM has a fully functional memremap() implementation, there is no longer a need to remove the UEFI memory map from the linear mapping in order to be able to create a permanent mapping for it using generic code. So remove the 'IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)' conditional we added in: 7cc8cbcf82d1 ("efi/arm64: Don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map mapping") ... and revert to using memblock_reserve() for both ARM and arm64. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-31-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi/arm*: Wire up 'struct screen_info' to efi-framebuffer platform deviceArd Biesheuvel
This adds code to the ARM and arm64 EFI init routines to expose a platform device of type 'efi-framebuffer' if 'struct screen_info' has been populated appropriately from the GOP protocol by the stub. Since the framebuffer may potentially be located in system RAM, make sure that the region is reserved and marked MEMBLOCK_NOMAP. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-24-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi/arm/libstub: Make screen_info accessible to the UEFI stubArd Biesheuvel
In order to hand over the framebuffer described by the GOP protocol and discovered by the UEFI stub, make struct screen_info accessible by the stub. This involves allocating a loader data buffer and passing it to the kernel proper via a UEFI Configuration Table, since the UEFI stub executes in the context of the decompressor, and cannot access the kernel's copy of struct screen_info directly. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-22-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi/arm*: Take the Memory Attributes table into accountArd Biesheuvel
Call into the generic memory attributes table support code at the appropriate times during the init sequence so that the UEFI Runtime Services region are mapped according to the strict permissions it specifies. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-15-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi: Check EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR version explicitlyArd Biesheuvel
Our efi_memory_desc_t type is based on EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR version 1 in the UEFI spec. No version updates are expected, but since we are about to introduce support for new firmware tables that use the same descriptor type, it makes sense to at least warn if we encounter other versions. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-9-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi: Remove global 'memmap' EFI memory mapMatt Fleming
Abolish the poorly named EFI memory map, 'memmap'. It is shadowed by a bunch of local definitions in various files and having two ways to access the EFI memory map ('efi.memmap' vs. 'memmap') is rather confusing. Furthermore, IA64 doesn't even provide this global object, which has caused issues when trying to write generic EFI memmap code. Replace all occurrences with efi.memmap, and convert the remaining iterator code to use for_each_efi_mem_desc(). Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-8-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi: Iterate over efi.memmap in for_each_efi_memory_desc()Matt Fleming
Most of the users of for_each_efi_memory_desc() are equally happy iterating over the EFI memory map in efi.memmap instead of 'memmap', since the former is usually a pointer to the latter. For those users that want to specify an EFI memory map other than efi.memmap, that can be done using for_each_efi_memory_desc_in_map(). One such example is in the libstub code where the firmware is queried directly for the memory map, it gets iterated over, and then freed. This change goes part of the way toward deleting the global 'memmap' variable, which is not universally available on all architectures (notably IA64) and is rather poorly named. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-7-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-28efi/arm*: Drop writable mapping of the UEFI System tableArd Biesheuvel
Commit: 2eec5dedf770 ("efi/arm-init: Use read-only early mappings") updated the early ARM UEFI init code to create the temporary, early mapping of the UEFI System table using read-only attributes, as a hardening measure against inadvertent modification. However, this still leaves the permanent, writable mapping of the UEFI System table, which is only ever referenced during invocations of UEFI Runtime Services, at which time the UEFI virtual mapping is available, which also covers the system table. (This is guaranteed by the fact that SetVirtualAddressMap(), which is a runtime service itself, converts various entries in the table to their virtual equivalents, which implies that the table must be covered by a RuntimeServicesData region that has the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute.) So instead of creating this permanent mapping, record the virtual address of the system table inside the UEFI virtual mapping, and dereference that when accessing the table. This protects the contents of the system table from inadvertent (or deliberate) modification when no UEFI Runtime Services calls are in progress. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461614832-17633-3-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-04-19efi: ARM: avoid warning about phys_addr_t castArnd Bergmann
memblock_remove() takes a phys_addr_t, which may be narrower than 64 bits, causing a harmless warning: drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c: In function 'reserve_regions': include/linux/kernel.h:29:20: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow] #define ULLONG_MAX (~0ULL) ^ drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c:152:21: note: in expansion of macro 'ULLONG_MAX' memblock_remove(0, ULLONG_MAX); This adds an explicit typecast to avoid the warning Fixes: 500899c2cc3e ("efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them") Acked-by Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2016-04-15efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing themArd Biesheuvel
There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal routine: - it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator; - deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form of additional properties on the nodes. Since the discovery of DT memory nodes occurs strictly before the UEFI init sequence, we can simply clear the memblock memory table before parsing the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer necessary to remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the stub as well. Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Acked-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2016-03-31efi/arm64: Don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map mappingArd Biesheuvel
Commit 4dffbfc48d65 ("arm64/efi: mark UEFI reserved regions as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP") updated the mapping logic of both the RuntimeServices regions as well as the kernel's copy of the UEFI memory map to set the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag, which causes these regions to be omitted from the kernel direct mapping, and from being covered by a struct page. For the RuntimeServices regions, this is an obvious win, since the contents of these regions have significance to the firmware executable code itself, and are mapped in the EFI page tables using attributes that are described in the UEFI memory map, and which may differ from the attributes we use for mapping system RAM. It also prevents the contents from being modified inadvertently, since the EFI page tables are only live during runtime service invocations. None of these concerns apply to the allocation that covers the UEFI memory map, since it is entirely owned by the kernel. Setting the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP on the region did allow us to use ioremap_cache() to map it both on arm64 and on ARM, since the latter does not allow ioremap_cache() to be used on regions that are covered by a struct page. The ioremap_cache() on ARM restriction will be lifted in the v4.7 timeframe, but in the mean time, it has been reported that commit 4dffbfc48d65 causes a regression on 64k granule kernels. This is due to the fact that, given the 64 KB page size, the region that we end up removing from the kernel direct mapping is rounded up to 64 KB, and this 64 KB page frame may be shared with the initrd when booting via GRUB (which does not align its EFI_LOADER_DATA allocations to 64 KB like the stub does). This will crash the kernel as soon as it tries to access the initrd. Since the issue is specific to arm64, revert back to memblock_reserve()'ing the UEFI memory map when running on arm64. This is a temporary fix for v4.5 and v4.6, and will be superseded in the v4.7 timeframe when we will be able to move back to memblock_reserve() unconditionally. Fixes: 4dffbfc48d65 ("arm64/efi: mark UEFI reserved regions as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP") Reported-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.5 Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
2016-02-22efi/arm-init: Use read-only early mappingsArd Biesheuvel
The early mappings of the EFI system table contents and the UEFI memory map are read-only from the OS point of view. So map them read-only to protect them from inadvertent modification. Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455712566-16727-8-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-12-09arm64/efi: refactor EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARMArd Biesheuvel
This refactors the EFI init and runtime code that will be shared between arm64 and ARM so that it can be built for both archs. Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-09arm64/efi: split off EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARMArd Biesheuvel
This splits off the early EFI init and runtime code that - discovers the EFI params and the memory map from the FDT, and installs the memblocks and config tables. - prepares and installs the EFI page tables so that UEFI Runtime Services can be invoked at the virtual address installed by the stub. This will allow it to be reused for 32-bit ARM. Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>