summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add base notifications supportCristian Marussi
Make SCMI base protocol register with the notification core. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add reset notifications supportCristian Marussi
Make SCMI reset protocol register with the notification core. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add sensor notifications supportCristian Marussi
Make SCMI sensor protocol register with the notification core. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add perf notifications supportCristian Marussi
Make SCMI perf protocol register with the notification core. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add power notifications supportCristian Marussi
Make SCMI power protocol register with the notification core. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification coreCristian Marussi
Initialize and enable SCMI notifications core support during bus/driver probe phase, so that protocols can start registering their supported events during their initialization. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and deliveryCristian Marussi
Add the core SCMI notifications dispatch and delivery support logic which is able to dispatch well-known received events from the Rx interrupt handler to the dedicated deferred worker. From there, it will deliver the events to the registered users' callbacks. Dispatch and delivery support is just added here, still not enabled. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registrationCristian Marussi
Add the core SCMI notifications callbacks-registration support: allow users to register their own callbacks against the desired events. Whenever a registration request is issued against a still non existent event, mark such request as pending for later processing, in order to account for possible late initializations of SCMI Protocols associated to loadable drivers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-07-01firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registrationCristian Marussi
Add the core SCMI notifications protocol-registration support: allow protocols to register their own set of supported events, during their initialization phase. Notification core can track multiple platform instances by their handles. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-06-30firmware: arm_scmi: Fix SCMI genpd domain probingCristian Marussi
When, at probe time, an SCMI communication failure inhibits the capacity to query power domains states, such domains should be skipped. Registering partially initialized SCMI power domains with genpd will causes kernel panic. arm-scmi timed out in resp(caller: scmi_power_state_get+0xa4/0xd0) scmi-power-domain scmi_dev.2: failed to get state for domain 9 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000006 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 CM = 0, WnR = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000009f3691000 [0000000000000000] pgd=00000009f1ca0003, p4d=00000009f1ca0003, pud=00000009f35ea003, pmd=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 2 PID: 381 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1-00011-gebd118c2cca8 #2 Hardware name: ARM LTD ARM Juno Development Platform/ARM Juno Development Platform, BIOS EDK II Jan 3 2020 Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) pc : of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0x98/0x1f8 lr : of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0x48/0x1f8 Call trace: of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0x98/0x1f8 scmi_pm_domain_probe+0x174/0x1e8 scmi_dev_probe+0x90/0xe0 really_probe+0xe4/0x448 driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x168 device_driver_attach+0x7c/0x88 bind_store+0xe8/0x128 drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x40 sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x60 kernfs_fop_write+0x114/0x230 __vfs_write+0x24/0x50 vfs_write+0xbc/0x1e0 ksys_write+0x70/0xf8 __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x94/0x160 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x98 el0_sync_handler+0x148/0x1a8 el0_sync+0x158/0x180 Do not register any power domain that failed to be queried with genpd. Fixes: 898216c97ed2 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200619220330.12217-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-06-30firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FWSudeep Holla
Commit e5bfb21d98b6 ("firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to identify SMCCC v1.1 and above") introduced new config option to identify the availability of SMCCC discoverability of version and features transparently hiding the indirect dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW. Commit 5a897e3ab429 ("firmware: arm_scmi: fix psci dependency") just worked around the build dependency making SCMI SMC/HVC transport depend on ARM_PSCI_FW at the time. Since it really just relies on SMCCC directly and not on ARM_PSCI_FW, let us move to use CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625101937.51939-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-06-30firmware: arm_scmi: Add fast_switch_possible() interfaceNicola Mazzucato
Add a new fast_switch_possible interface to the existing perf_ops to export the information of whether or not fast_switch is possible for a given device. This can be used by the cpufreq driver and framework to choose proper mechanism for frequency change. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617094332.8391-1-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-06-30firmware: arm_scmi: Use signed integer to report transfer statusSudeep Holla
Currently the trace event 'scmi_xfer_end' reports the status of the transfer using the unsigned status field read from the firmware which may not be easy to interpret. It may also miss to emit any timeouts that happen in the driver resulting in emitting garbage in the status field in those scenarios. Let us use signed integer so that error values are emitted out after they are mapped from firmware error formats to standard linux error codes. While at this, also include any timeouts in the driver itself. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609134503.55860-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-05-07firmware: arm_scmi: fix psci dependencySudeep Holla
When CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW is disabled but CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC is enabled, arm-scmi runs into a link failure: arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.o: in function `smc_send_message': smc.c:(.text+0x200): undefined reference to `arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit' Change from HAVE_ARM_SMCCC to ARM_PSCI_FW config dependency for now. We rely on PSCI bindings anyways for the conduit and this should be fine. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507144905.11397-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Fixes: 1dc6558062da ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add smc/hvc transport") Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-20firmware: arm_scmi: Fix return error code in smc_send_messageSudeep Holla
SMCCC can return NOT_SUPPORTED(-1). Map it to appropriate Linux error codes namely -EOPNOTSUPP. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417103232.6896-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Reported-and-Tested-by:: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-20firmware: arm_scmi: Fix handling of unexpected delayed responsesCristian Marussi
Upon reception of an unexpected bogus delayed response, clear the channel and bail-out safely. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com Fixes: 4d09852b6f01 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing") Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-20firmware: arm_scmi: Clear channel for delayed responsesCristian Marussi
Clear channel properly when done processing a delayed response. This will let the platform firmware know that the channel is now free to use it for any new delayed response or notification. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> (sudeep.holla: Updated commit log to reflect that channel is now free for platform to use) Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-20firmware: arm_scmi: Clear channel on reception of unexpected responsesCristian Marussi
When an unexpected response message is received we currently warn the user and bail-out, ensure to also free the channel by invoking the transport independent operation .clear_channel() Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-20firmware: arm_scmi: Rename .clear_notification() transport_opsCristian Marussi
SCMI transport operation .clear_notification() is indeed a generic method to clear the channel in a transport dependent way, as such it could be a useful helper also in other contexts. Rename such method as .clear_channel(), renaming accordingly also its already existent call-sites. No functional change. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processingSudeep Holla
Add the mechanisms to distinguish notifications from delayed responses and command responses. Also add support to properly fetch notification messages upon reception. Notifications processing does not continue any further after the fetch phase. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [Reworked/renamed scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp()] Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layerCristian Marussi
Add common transport-layer methods to: - fetch a notification instead of a response - clear a pending notification Add also all the needed support in mailbox/shmem transports. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification listSudeep Holla
Add commands' enumerations and messages definitions for all existing notify-enable commands across all protocols. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notificationsSudeep Holla
With all the plumbing in place, let's just add the separate dedicated receive buffers to handle notifications that can arrive asynchronously from the platform firmware to OS. Also add one check to see if the platform supports any receive channels before allocating the receive buffers: since those buffers are optionally supported though, the whole xfer initialization is also postponed to be able to check for their existence in advance. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [Changed parameters in __scmi_xfer_info_init()] Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Drop checking for shmem property in parent nodeSudeep Holla
The scmi protocol core driver checks for the channel availability before evaluating the shmem property. If the individual protocols don't have separate channel assigned to them, the channel alloted for the BASE protocol is reused automatically. Therefore there is no need to check for the shmem property in the parent node if it is absent in the child protocol node. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Check shmem property for channel availablitySudeep Holla
Instead of declaring the channel availabilty unconditionally, let us check for the presence of "shmem" property and return the channel availablity accordingly. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Drop empty stub for smc_mark_txdoneSudeep Holla
The scmi protocol core driver check for non NULL mark_txdone before invoking the same. There is no need to provide a empty stub. SMC/HVC calls are synchronous and the call return indicates the completion. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Make mutex channel specificSudeep Holla
In order to support multiple SMC/HVC transport channels with associated shared memory, it is better to maintain the mutex per channel instead of existing global one. Move the smc_mutex into the scmi_smc structure and also rename it to shmem_lock which is more appropriate for it's use. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327163654.13389-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-04-14firmware: arm_scmi: Add smc/hvc transportPeng Fan
Use the value of "arm,smc-id" property from the device tree as the first argument for SMCCC call leaving all the other arguments as zero for now. There is no Rx, only Tx because of smc/hvc not support Rx. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583673879-20714-3-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> [sudeep.holla: reworded commit log/subject and fixed !HAVE_ARM_SMCCC build] Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-02-20firmware: arm_scmi/perf: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Replace the zero-length member "opp" in scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels structure with flexible-array. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211231252.GA14830@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-02-20firmware: arm_scmi: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Replace the zero-length member "msg_payload" in scmi_shared_mem structure with flexible-array. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211231045.GA13956@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> [ rebased the change as files are moved around ] Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-02-10firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport typeViresh Kumar
The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol, which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else. The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the mailbox transport layer. This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new file: mailbox.c and all struct shared_mem related code to a new file: shmem.c. We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI messages. The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops, with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8698a3cec199b8feab35c2339f02dc232bfd773b.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-02-10firmware: arm_scmi: Move macros and helpers to common.hViresh Kumar
Move message header specific macros and helper routines to common.h as they will be used outside of driver.c in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6615db480370719b0a0241447a5f3feb8eea421f.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2020-02-10firmware: arm_scmi: Update doc style commentsViresh Kumar
Fix minor formatting issues with the doc style comments. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1bff7c0d1ad2c8b6eeff9660421f414f8c612eb2.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-30drivers: firmware: scmi: Extend SCMI transport layer by trace eventsLukasz Luba
The SCMI transport layer communicates via mailboxes and shared memory with firmware running on a microcontroller. It is platform specific how long it takes to pass a SCMI message. The most sensitive requests are coming from CPUFreq subsystem, which might be used by the scheduler. Thus, there is a need to measure these delays and capture anomalies. This change introduces trace events wrapped around transfer code. According to Jim's suggestion a unique transfer_id is to distinguish similar entries which might have the same message id, protocol id and sequence. This is a case then there are some timeouts in transfers. Suggested-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Skip protocol initialisation for additional devicesSudeep Holla
The scmi bus now supports adding multiple devices per protocol, and since scmi_protocol_init is called for each scmi device created, we must avoid allocating protocol private data and initialising the protocol itself if it is already initialised. In order to achieve the same, we can simple replace the idr pointer from protocol initialisation function to a dummy function. Suggested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Stash version in protocol init functionsSudeep Holla
In order to avoid querying the individual protocol versions multiple time with more that one device created for each protocol, we can simple store the copy in the protocol specific private data and use them whenever required. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Match scmi device by both name and protocol idSudeep Holla
The scmi bus now has support to match the driver with devices not only based on their protocol id but also based on their device name if one is available. This was added to cater the need to support multiple devices and drivers for the same protocol. Let us add the name "genpd" to scmi_device_id table in the driver so that in matches only with device with the same name and protocol id SCMI_PROTOCOL_POWER. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Add versions and identifier attributes using dev_groupsSudeep Holla
Platform drivers now have the option to have the platform core create and remove any needed sysfs attribute files. Using the same, let's add the scmi firmware and protocol version attributes as well as vendor and sub-vendor identifiers to sysfs. It helps to identify the firmware details from the sysfs entries similar to ARM SCPI implementation. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Add names to scmi devices createdSudeep Holla
Now that scmi bus provides option to create named scmi device, let us create the default devices with names. This will help to add names for matching to respective drivers and eventually to add multiple devices and drivers per protocol. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Skip scmi mbox channel setup for addtional devicesSudeep Holla
Now that the scmi bus supports adding multiple devices per protocol, and since scmi_create_protocol_device calls scmi_mbox_chan_setup, we must avoid allocating and initialising the mbox channel if it is already initialised. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-12-24firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for multiple device per protocolSudeep Holla
Currently only one scmi device is created for each protocol enumerated. However, there is requirement to make use of some procotols by multiple kernel subsystems/frameworks. One such example is SCMI PERFORMANCE protocol which can be used by both cpufreq and devfreq drivers. Similarly, SENSOR protocol may be used by hwmon and iio subsystems, and POWER protocol may be used by genpd and regulator drivers. In order to achieve that, let us extend the scmi bus to match based not only protocol id but also the scmi device name if one is available. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-11-26firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid double free in error flowWen Yang
If device_register() fails, both put_device() and kfree() are called, ending with a double free of the scmi_dev. Calling kfree() is needed only when a failure happens between the allocation of the scmi_dev and its registration, so move it to there and remove it from the error flow. Fixes: 46edb8d1322c ("firmware: arm_scmi: provide the mandatory device release callback") Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-11-14firmware: arm_scmi: Fix doorbell ring logic for !CONFIG_64BITSudeep Holla
The logic to ring the scmi performance fastchannel ignores the value read from the doorbell register in case of !CONFIG_64BIT. This bug also shows up as warning with '-Wunused-but-set-variable' gcc flag: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c: In function scmi_perf_fc_ring_db: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c:323:7: warning: variable val set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Fix the same by aligning the logic with CONFIG_64BIT as used in the macro SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(). Fixes: 823839571d76 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make use SCMI v2.0 fastchannel for performance protocol") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Reported-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-09-18firmware: arm_scmi: reset: fix reset_state assignment in scmi_domain_resetSudeep Holla
Fix the copy paste typo that incorrectly assigns domain_id with the passed 'state' parameter instead of reset_state. Fixes: 95a15d80aa0d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add RESET protocol in SCMI v2.0") Reported-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Add RESET protocol in SCMI v2.0Sudeep Holla
SCMIv2.0 adds a new Reset Management Protocol to manage various reset states a given device or domain can enter. Device(s) that can be collectively reset through a common reset signal constitute a reset domain for the firmware. A reset domain can be reset autonomously or explicitly through assertion and de-assertion of the signal. When autonomous reset is chosen, the firmware is responsible for taking the necessary steps to reset the domain and to subsequently bring it out of reset. When explicit reset is chosen, the caller has to specifically assert and then de-assert the reset signal by issuing two separate RESET commands. Add the basic SCMI reset infrastructure that can be used by Linux reset controller driver. Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Make use SCMI v2.0 fastchannel for performance protocolSudeep Holla
SCMI v2.0 adds support for "FastChannel" which do not use a message header as they are specialized for a single message. Only PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_{SET,GET} and PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_{SET,GET} commands are supported over fastchannels. As they are optional, they need to be discovered by PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL command. Further {LIMIT,LEVEL}_SET commands can have optional doorbell support. Add support for making use of these fastchannels. Cc: Ionela Voinescu <Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com> Cc: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com> Cc: Quentin Perret <Quentin.Perret@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Add discovery of SCMI v2.0 performance fastchannelsSudeep Holla
SCMI v2.0 adds support for "FastChannel", a lightweight unidirectional channel that is dedicated to a single SCMI message type for controlling a specific platform resource. They do not use a message header as they are specialized for a single message. Only PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_{SET,GET} and PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_{SET,GET} commands are supported over fastchannels. As they are optional, they need to be discovered by PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL command. Further {LIMIT,LEVEL}_SET commands can have optional doorbell support. Add support for discovery of these fastchannels. Cc: Ionela Voinescu <Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com> Cc: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com> Cc: Quentin Perret <Quentin.Perret@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Use {get,put}_unaligned_le{32,64} accessorsSudeep Holla
Instead of type-casting the {tx,rx}.buf all over the place while accessing them to read/write __le{32,64} from/to the firmware, let's use the existing {get,put}_unaligned_le{32,64} accessors to hide all the type cast ugliness. Suggested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possibleSudeep Holla
CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached. Tracking the current count of pending asynchronous clock set rate requests, we can decide if the incoming/new request for clock set rate can be handled asynchronously or not until the maximum limit is reached. Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2019-08-12firmware: arm_scmi: Drop config flag in clk_ops->rate_setSudeep Holla
CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached. In order to add that support, let's drop the config flag passed to clk_ops->rate_set and handle the asynchronous requests dynamically. Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>