| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With hardware resets in mind it is possible that all shared fences are
signaled, but the exlusive isn't. Fix waiting for everything in this situation.
v2: make sure we always wait for the exclusive fence
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1502384509-10465-3-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
|
|
Allows us to copy all the fences in a reservation object to another one.
v2: handle NULL src_list
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1502384509-10465-2-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
|
|
No need to check.
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1502141543-13455-2-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
|
|
Reverts commit fb8b7d2b9d80
("reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)")
Otherwise signaling might never be activated on the fences. This can
result in infinite waiting with hardware which has unreliable interrupts.
v2: still return one when the timeout is zero and we don't have any fences.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
[sumits: fix checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-4-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
|
|
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
operations to make room.
A consensus was reached in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
remains a good thing!
(v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel
coccinelle script:
@@
@@
- struct fence
+ struct dma_fence
@@
@@
- struct fence_ops
+ struct dma_fence_ops
@@
@@
- struct fence_cb
+ struct dma_fence_cb
@@
@@
- struct fence_array
+ struct dma_fence_array
@@
@@
- enum fence_flag_bits
+ enum dma_fence_flag_bits
@@
@@
(
- fence_init
+ dma_fence_init
|
- fence_release
+ dma_fence_release
|
- fence_free
+ dma_fence_free
|
- fence_get
+ dma_fence_get
|
- fence_get_rcu
+ dma_fence_get_rcu
|
- fence_put
+ dma_fence_put
|
- fence_signal
+ dma_fence_signal
|
- fence_signal_locked
+ dma_fence_signal_locked
|
- fence_default_wait
+ dma_fence_default_wait
|
- fence_add_callback
+ dma_fence_add_callback
|
- fence_remove_callback
+ dma_fence_remove_callback
|
- fence_enable_sw_signaling
+ dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
|
- fence_is_signaled_locked
+ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
|
- fence_is_signaled
+ dma_fence_is_signaled
|
- fence_is_later
+ dma_fence_is_later
|
- fence_later
+ dma_fence_later
|
- fence_wait_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_timeout
|
- fence_wait_any_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
|
- fence_wait
+ dma_fence_wait
|
- fence_context_alloc
+ dma_fence_context_alloc
|
- fence_array_create
+ dma_fence_array_create
|
- to_fence_array
+ to_dma_fence_array
|
- fence_is_array
+ dma_fence_is_array
|
- trace_fence_emit
+ trace_dma_fence_emit
|
- FENCE_TRACE
+ DMA_FENCE_TRACE
|
- FENCE_WARN
+ DMA_FENCE_WARN
|
- FENCE_ERR
+ DMA_FENCE_ERR
)
(
...
)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
[danvet: Mark up as function for proper cross-linking.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1471640134-30888-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
|
|
- WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
- WARNING: line over 80 characters
- WARNING: please, no space before tabs
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
|
|
It was causing the return value of fence_is_signaled to be ignored, making
reservation objects signal too early.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
|
|
When the timeout value passed to reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
is zero, no wait should be done if the fences are not signaled.
Return '1' for idle and '0' for busy if the specified timeout is '0'
to keep consistent with the case of non-zero timeout.
v2: call fence_put if not signaled in the case of timeout==0
v3: switch to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu
Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
|
|
This adds some extra functions to deal with rcu.
reservation_object_get_fences_rcu() will obtain the list of shared
and exclusive fences without obtaining the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() will wait on all fences of the
reservation_object, without obtaining the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() will test if all fences of the
reservation_object are signaled without using the ww_mutex.
reservation_object_get_excl and reservation_object_get_list require
the reservation object to be held, updating requires
write_seqcount_begin/end. If only the exclusive fence is needed,
rcu_dereference followed by fence_get_rcu can be used, if the shared
fences are needed it's recommended to use the supplied functions.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-By: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Move the list of shared fences to a struct, and return it in
reservation_object_get_list().
Add reservation_object_get_excl to get the exclusive fence.
Add reservation_object_reserve_shared(), which reserves space
in the reservation_object for 1 more shared fence.
reservation_object_add_shared_fence() and
reservation_object_add_excl_fence() are used to assign a new
fence to a reservation_object pointer, to complete a reservation.
Changes since v1:
- Add reservation_object_get_excl, reorder code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
