summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-02-09cpufreq: governors: Fix WARN_ON() for multi-policy platformsViresh Kumar
On multi-policy systems there is a single instance of governor for both the policies (if same governor is chosen for both policies). With the code update from following patches: 8eeed09 cpufreq: governors: Get rid of dbs_data->enable field b394058 cpufreq: governors: Reset tunables only for cpufreq_unregister_governor() We are creating/removing sysfs directory of governor for for every call to GOV_START and STOP. This would fail for multi-policy system as there is a per-policy call to START/STOP. This patch reuses the governor->initialized variable to detect total users of governor. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-09cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu)Viresh Kumar
policy->cpu or cpus in policy->cpus can't be offline anymore. And so we don't need to check if they are online or not. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: Reset tunables only for cpufreq_unregister_governor()Viresh Kumar
Currently, whenever governor->governor() is called for CPUFRREQ_GOV_START event we reset few tunables of governor. Which isn't correct, as this routine is called for every cpu hot-[un]plugging event. We should actually be resetting these only when the governor module is removed and re-installed. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between governorsViresh Kumar
With the inclusion of following patches: 9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary code redundancy between the conservative and ondemand governors is introduced again, so get rid of it. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: Get rid of dbs_data->enable fieldViresh Kumar
CPUFREQ_GOV_START/STOP are called only once for all policy->cpus and hence we don't need to adapt cpufreq_governor_dbs() routine for multiple calls. So, this patch removes dbs_data->enable field entirely. And rearrange code a bit. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: fix misuse of cdbs.cpuFabio Baltieri
Fix governors code to set all cpu's cdbs->cpu to the the actual cpu id and use cur_policy->cpu istead of cdbs->cpu to track current governor's leader cpu. Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: implement generic policy_is_sharedFabio Baltieri
Implement a generic helper function policy_is_shared() to replace the current dbs_sw_coordinated_cpus() at cpufreq level, so that it can be used by code other than cpufreq governors. Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: governors: clean timer init and exit codeFabio Baltieri
Drop unused arguments from dbs_timer_init and clean dbs_timer_exit and cpufreq_governor_dbs to remove non necessary special cases. Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessaryFabio Baltieri
Modify ondemand timer to not resample CPU utilization if recently sampled from another SW coordinated core. Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUsRickard Andersson
This patch fixes a bug that occurred when we had load on a secondary CPU and the primary CPU was sleeping. Only one sampling timer was spawned and it was spawned as a deferred timer on the primary CPU, so when a secondary CPU had a change in load this was not detected by the cpufreq governor (both ondemand and conservative). This patch make sure that deferred timers are run on all CPUs in the case of software controlled CPUs that run on the same frequency. Signed-off-by: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-24cpufreq: governors: Fix jiffies/cputime mixup (revisited)Rafael J. Wysocki
This change was made by commit 8636fd2 (cpufreq: fix jiffies/cputime mixup in conservative/ondemand governors) before, but then it has been reverted inadvertently by commit 4471a34 (cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code). The changelog of commit 8636fd2's says: The function get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy in both the conservative and ondemand governors use jiffies_to_usecs to convert a cputime value to usecs which gives the wrong value on architectures where cputime and jiffies use different units. Only matters if NO_HZ is disabled, since otherwise get_cpu_idle_time_us should already return a valid value, and get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy isn't actually called. Since now we have only one common get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy() used by both governors in question, modify it along the lines of commit 8636fd2 to restore the correct behavior. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2012-11-15cpufreq: Fix sparse warnings by updating cputime64_t to u64Viresh Kumar
There were few sparse warnings due to mismatch of type on function arguments. Two types were used u64 and cputime64_t. Both are actually u64, so use u64 only. Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15cpufreq: governors: remove redundant codeViresh Kumar
Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage. This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues. This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15cpufreq: fix jiffies/cputime mixup in conservative/ondemand governorsAndreas Schwab
The function get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy in both the conservative and ondemand governors use jiffies_to_usecs to convert a cputime value to usecs which gives the wrong value on architectures where cputime and jiffies use different units. Only matters if NO_HZ is disabled, since otherwise get_cpu_idle_time_us should already return a valid value, and get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy isn't actually called. Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15cpufreq: Move common part from governors to separate file, v2viresh kumar
Multiple cpufreq governers have defined similar get_cpu_idle_time_***() routines. These routines must be moved to some common place, so that all governors can use them. So moving them to cpufreq_governor.c, which seems to be a better place for keeping these routines. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>