summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/dock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-06-23ACPI / dock: Initialize ACPI dock subsystem upfrontJiang Liu
Commit 3b63aaa70e1 (PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver mechanism) introduced an ACPI dock support regression, because it changed the relative initialization order of the ACPI dock subsystem and the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp). Namely, the ACPI dock subsystem has to be initialized before acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is first run, which after commit 3b63aaa70e1 happens during the initial enumeration of the PCI hierarchy triggered by the initial ACPI namespace scan in acpi_scan_init(). For this reason, the dock subsystem has to be initialized before the initial ACPI namespace scan in acpi_scan_init(). To make that happen, modify the ACPI dock subsystem to be non-modular and add the invocation of its initialization routine, acpi_dock_init(), to acpi_scan_init() directly before the initial namespace scan. [rjw: Changelog, removal of dock_exit().] References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501 Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com> Tested-by: Illya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-19ACPI / dock: Take ACPI scan lock in write_undock()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since commit 3757b94 (ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks) acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() must always be called under acpi_scan_lock, but currently the following scenario violating that requirement is possible: write_undock() handle_eject_request() hotplug_dock_devices() dock_remove_acpi_device() acpi_bus_trim() Fix that by making write_undock() acquire acpi_scan_lock before calling handle_eject_request() as appropriate (begin_undock() is under the lock too in analogy with acpi_dock_deferred_cb()). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-02-13ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaksRafael J. Wysocki
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-02ACPI / dock: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/acpi/dock.cYasuaki Ishimatsu
acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status. The patch change not to apply ACPI_SUCCESS() to the return value of acpi_bus_get_device(). Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-26ACPI / scan: Make it clear that acpi_bus_trim() cannot failRafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_bus_trim() cannot fail, change its definition to a void function, so that its callers don't check the return value in vain and update the callers. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-19ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() insteadRafael J. Wysocki
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-01-15ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim()Rafael J. Wysocki
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim() to always behave as though it were 1. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argumentRafael J. Wysocki
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add() too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that handle). For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device() anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan() executed directly from acpi_scan_init(). Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2013-01-03ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not usedRafael J. Wysocki
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed lines of code (Linus will like that). Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make note to self to take care of that later). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
2012-11-21ACPI: Update Dock hotplug error messagesToshi Kani
Updated Dock hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Replaced acpi_get_name() & kfree() with apci_handle_<level>(). Added error status to the messages where needed. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: dock: Remove redundant ACPI NS walkToshi Kani
Combined two ACPI namespace walks, which look for dock stations and then bays separately, into a single walk. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-01-13module_param: make bool parameters really bool (drivers & misc)Rusty Russell
module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy trick. It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2011-07-16ACPI: constify ops structsVasiliy Kulikov
Structs battery_file, acpi_dock_ops, file_operations, thermal_cooling_device_ops, thermal_zone_device_ops, kernel_param_ops are not changed in runtime. It is safe to make them const. register_hotplug_dock_device() was altered to take const "ops" argument to respect acpi_dock_ops' const notion. Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPICA: Rename some function and variable namesLin Ming
Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with ACPICA code base. acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info ... Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-10-26Merge branch 'misc' into releaseLen Brown
2010-10-19ACPI dock: move some functions to .init.textUwe Kleine-König
find_dock and find_bay are only called by dock_init which lives in .init.text dock_add is only called by find_dock and find_bay. So all three functions can be moved to .init.text, too. This fixes: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2134b7): Section mismatch in reference from the function dock_add() to the function .init.text:platform_device_register_resndata() The function dock_add() references the function __init platform_device_register_resndata(). This is often because dock_add lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of platform_device_register_resndata is wrong. for a build with unset CONFIG_MODULES. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-09-24ACPI / ACPICA: Defer enabling of runtime GPEs (v3)Rafael J. Wysocki
The current ACPI GPEs initialization code has a problem that it enables some GPEs pointed to by device _PRW methods, generally intended for signaling wakeup events (system or device wakeup). These GPEs are then almost immediately disabled by the ACPI namespace scanning code with the help of acpi_gpe_can_wake(), but it would be better not to enable them at all until really necessary. Modify the initialization of GPEs so that the ones that have associated _Lxx or _Exx methods and are not pointed to by any _PRW methods will be enabled after the namespace scan is complete. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-04-06Merge branches 'battery', 'bugzilla-14667', 'bugzilla-15096', ↵Len Brown
'bugzilla-15480', 'bugzilla-15521', 'bugzilla-15605', 'gpe-reference-counters', 'misc', 'pxm-fix' and 'video-random-key' into release
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking ↵Tejun Heo
implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-23ACPI dock: support multiple ACPI dock devicesZhang Rui
There may be multiple ACPI dock devices exist in ACPI namespace and we should probe all of them. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15521 CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-08Merge branch 'for-next' into for-linusJiri Kosina
Conflicts: Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt arch/arm/mach-u300/include/mach/debug-macro.S drivers/net/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c drivers/net/qlge/qlge_main.c drivers/net/typhoon.c
2010-02-16ACPI: dock: properly initialize local struct dock_station in dock_add()Alex Chiang
Commit fe06fba2 (ACPI: dock: add struct dock_station * directly to platform device data) changed dock_add() to use the platform_device_register_data() API. We passed that interface a stack variable, which is kmemdup'ed and assigned to the device's platform_data pointer. Unfortunately, whatever random garbage is in the stack variable gets coped during the kmemdup, and that leads to broken behavior. Explicitly zero out the structure before passing it to the API. This fixes the T41 docking button issue: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15000 Cc: stable@kernel.org Reported-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-02-09tree-wide: Assorted spelling fixesDaniel Mack
In particular, several occurances of funny versions of 'success', 'unknown', 'therefore', 'acknowledge', 'argument', 'achieve', 'address', 'beginning', 'desirable', 'separate' and 'necessary' are fixed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2009-12-16Merge branch 'dock' into releaseLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/dock.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16ACPI: dock: minor whitespace and style cleanupsAlex Chiang
Removed some stray whitespaces Added whitespace when needed for legibility Removed unneeded curly braces Removed useless void casts Removed unnecessary local variable initialization Renamed variables to help out with 80-column fixes Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16ACPI: dock: add struct dock_station * directly to platform device dataAlex Chiang
Instead of adding a (struct dock_station **) to our dock device's platform data, we can add the (struct dock_station *) directly. This change saves us some ugly casting and improves readability. The cost of making this change is an extra 290 bytes of stack usage, but this is an infrequently called code-path and unlikely to cause the kernel to blow up. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16ACPI: dock: dock_add - hoist up platform_device_register_simple()Alex Chiang
Move the call to platform_device_register_simple so that we do it before allocating and initializing our struct dock_station. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16ACPI: dock: remove global 'dock_device_name'Alex Chiang
We only use it in one spot, so it probably gets optimized out, but there's still no need to use a global variable for this. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-12-16ACPI: dock: combine add|alloc_dock_dependent_device (v2)Alex Chiang
There's no real need to have a separate allocation step when adding a dock dependent device. Combining the two functions is both logical and helps with legibility. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-24ACPICA: Add post-order callback to acpi_walk_namespaceLin Ming
The existing interface only has a pre-order callback. This change adds an additional parameter for a post-order callback which will be more useful for bus scans. ACPICA BZ 779. Also update the external calls to acpi_walk_namespace. http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=779 Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-03ACPI: dock: convert sysfs attributes to an attribute_groupAlex Chiang
As suggested by Dmitry Torokhov, convert the individual sysfs attributes into an attribute group. This change eliminates quite a bit of copy/paste code in the error handling paths. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-10-03ACPI: dock: fix "sibiling" typoAlex Chiang
Crossword clues as haikus: Snakes from the same brood fighting Jackson on a plane? sibilant siblings I guess Will Shortz's job is still secure. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-09-19Merge branch 'acpica' into releaseLen Brown
2009-08-28ACPI: Move definition of PREFIX from acpi_bus.h to internal..hLen Brown
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-08-27ACPICA: Major update for acpi_get_object_info external interfaceBob Moore
Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface. Changes include: - Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings - Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.) - Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object - Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge - Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO. These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface. See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details. Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-05Merge branch 'linus' into releaseLen Brown
Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-03dock: fix dereference after kfree()Dan Carpenter
dock_remove() calls kfree() on dock_station so we should use list_for_each_entry_safe() to avoid dereferencing freed memory. Found by smatch (http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git/). Compile tested. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-03-24Driver core: implement uevent suppress in kobjectMing Lei
This patch implements uevent suppress in kobject and removes it from struct device, based on the following ideas: 1,Uevent sending should be one attribute of kobject, so suppressing it in kobject layer is more natural than in device layer. By this way, we can do it for other objects embedded with kobject. 2,It may save several bytes for each instance of struct device.(On my omap3(32bit ARM) based box, can save 8bytes per device object) This patch also introduces dev_set|get_uevent_suppress() helpers to set and query uevent_suppress attribute in case to help kobject as private part of struct device in future. [This version is against the latest driver-core patch set of Greg,please ignore the last version.] Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2009-02-07Merge branches 'release', 'asus', 'bugzilla-12450', 'cpuidle', 'debug', ↵Len Brown
'ec', 'misc', 'printk' and 'processor' into release
2009-02-07ACPI: add missing KERN_* constants to printksFrank Seidel
According to kerneljanitors todo list all printk calls (beginning a new line) should have an according KERN_* constant. Those are the missing peaces here for the acpi subsystem. Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-02-06ACPI: dock: Don't eval _STA on every show_docked sysfs readHolger Macht
Some devices trigger a DEVICE_CHECK on every evalutation of _STA. This can also be seen in commit 8b59560a3baf2e7c24e0fb92ea5d09eca92805db (ACPI: dock: avoid check _STA method). If an undock is processed, the dock driver sends a uevent and userspace might read the show_docked property in sysfs. This causes an evaluation of _STA of the particular device which causes the dock driver to immediately dock again. In any case, evaluation of _STA (show_docked) does not necessarily mean that we are docked, so check with the internal device structure. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12360 Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'ull' into testLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/bay.c drivers/acpi/dock.c drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernelsMatthew Wilcox
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11Subject: ACPI dock: Use ACPI_EXCEPTION instead of printk(KERN_ERRThomas Renninger
lenb: stripped patch down to what still applied to new dock.c Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23dock: add 'type' sysfs fileShaohua Li
add a sysfs file to present dock type. Suggested by Holger. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23dock: fix for ATA bay in a dock stationShaohua Li
an ATA bay can be in a dock and itself can be ejected separately. This patch handles such eject bay. Found by Holger. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23dock: introduce .uevent for devices in dock, eg libataShaohua Li
dock's uevent reported itself, not ata. It might be difficult to find an ata device just according to a dock. This patch introduces docking ops for each device in a dock. when docking, dock driver can send device specific uevent. This should help dock station too (not just bay) Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23libata: remove functions now handed by ACPI dock driverShaohua Li
dock driver can handle ata(bay) hotplug now. dock driver already handles _EJ0 and _STA, so remove them. Also libata doesn't need register notification handler anymore. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23ACPI: fix hotplug raceZhang Rui
The hotplug notification handler and drivers' notification handler all run in one workqueue. Before hotplug removes an acpi device, the device driver's notification handler is already be recorded to run just after global notification handler. After hotplug notification handler runs, acpica will notice a NULL notification handler and crash. So now we run run hotplug in another workqueue and wait for all acpi notication handlers finish. This was found in battery hotplug, but actually all hotplug can be affected. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-23ACPI: introduce notifier change to avoid duplicatesShaohua Li
The battery driver already registers notification handler. To avoid registering notification handler again, introduce a notifier chain in global system notifier handler and use it in dock driver. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>