Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
ACPICA commit 3b1026e0bdd3c32eb6d5d313f3ba0b1fee7597b4
ACPICA commit 00f0dc83f5cfca53b27a3213ae0d7719b88c2d6b
ACPICA commit 47d22a738d0e19fd241ffe4e3e9d4e198e4afc69
Across all of ACPICA. Replace C library macros such as ACPI_STRLEN with the
standard names such as strlen. The original purpose for these macros is
long since obsolete.
Also cast various invocations as necessary. Bob Moore, Jung-uk Kim, Lv Zheng.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/3b1026e0
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/00f0dc83
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/47d22a73
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
ACPICA commit 6eb364d790dd103bd4990f808e0095a421c437cb
acpi_tb_store_table() implements a logic that is only correct to iasl. So it
won't be used by any other utilities except iasl. This function is
complained by the kernel users as an unused function. The best choice to
stop releasing it to the Linux kernel should be moving it to adisasm.c.
ACPI table manager can use both struct acpi_table_desc (direct referencing)
and table index (indirect referencing) as the descriptor to the table, so
acpi_tb_get_next_root_index() is extended to return both of them to allow
maximum usability from the callers. NOTE that indirect referencing is a
design result to meet the boot stage static allocation requirement for the
table descriptors.
This is a linuxized acpi_tb_store_table() removing result, there should be
no functional changes introduced to the Linux kernel by this patch except
the additonal kernel unused argument for acpi_tb_get_next_root_index()
(renamed to acpi_tb_get_next_root_index()). This argument is used in the
ACPICA upstream.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/6eb364d7
Reported-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
ACPICA commit b60612373a4ef63b64a57c124576d7ddb6d8efb6
For physical addresses, since the address may exceed 32-bit address range
after calculation, we should use 0x%8.8X%8.8X instead of ACPI_PRINTF_UINT
and ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64() instead of
ACPI_FORMAT_NATIVE_UINT()/ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT().
This patch also removes above replaced macros as there are no users.
This is a preparation to switch acpi_physical_address to 64-bit on 32-bit
kernel builds.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/b6061237
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
ACPI_PHYSADDR_TO_PTR()/ACPI_PTR_TO_PHYSADDR().
ACPICA commit 154f6d074dd38d6ebc0467ad454454e6c5c9ecdf
There are code pieces converting pointers using "(acpi_physical_address) x"
or "ACPI_CAST_PTR (t, x)" formats, this patch cleans up them.
Known issues:
1. Cleanup of "(ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRRESS) x" for a table field
For the conversions around the table fields, it is better to fix it with
alignment also fixed. So this patch doesn't modify such code. There
should be no functional problem by leaving them unchanged.
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/154f6d07
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
ACPICA commit 8990e73ab2aa15d6a0068b860ab54feff25bee36
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/8990e73a
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
It is reported that Linux x86 kernel cannot map large tables. The following
large SSDT table on such platform fails to pass checksum verification and
cannot be installed:
ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000B9638018 07A0C4 (v02 INTEL S2600CP 00004000 INTL 20100331)
It sounds strange that in the 64-bit virtual memory address space, we
cannot map a single ACPI table to do checksum verification. The root cause
is:
1. ACPICA doesn't split IO memory mapping and table mapping;
2. Linux x86 OSL implements acpi_os_map_memory() using a size limited fix-map
mechanism during early boot stage, which is more suitable for only IO
mappings.
ACPICA originally only mapped table header for signature validation, and
this header mapping is required by OSL override mechanism. There was no
checksum verification because we could not map the whole table using this
OSL. While the following ACPICA commit enforces checksum verification by
mapping the whole table during Linux boot stage and it finally triggers
this issue on some platforms:
Commit: 86dfc6f339886559d80ee0d4bd20fe5ee90450f0
Subject: ACPICA: Tables: Fix table checksums verification before installation.
Before doing further cleanups for the OSL table mapping and override
implementation, this patch introduces an option for such OSPMs to
temporarily discard the checksum verification feature. It then can be
re-enabled easily when the ACPICA and the underlying OSL is ready.
This patch also deletes a comment around the limitation of mappings because
it is not correct. The limitation is not how many times we can map in the
early stage, but the OSL mapping facility may not be suitable for mapping
the ACPI tables and thus may complain us the size limitation.
The acpi_tb_verify_table() is renamed to acpi_tb_verify_temp_table() due to the
work around added, it now only applies to the table descriptor that hasn't
been installed and cannot be used in other cases. Lv Zheng.
Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
New file is tbdata.c -- management functions for ACPICA table
manager data structures.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|