summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/sparc/prom/misc_64.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2014-05-18sparc64: fix sparse warnings in smp_64.cSam Ravnborg
Fix following warnings: smp_64.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'smp_callin' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:133:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_panic' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:187:6: warning: symbol 'smp_synchronize_tick_client' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:821:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_client' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:827:18: warning: symbol 'smp_call_function_single_client' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:964:18: warning: symbol 'smp_new_mmu_context_version_client' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:1149:6: warning: symbol 'smp_capture' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:1171:6: warning: symbol 'smp_release' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:1190:18: warning: symbol 'smp_penguin_jailcell' was not declared. Should it be static? smp_64.c:1410:18: warning: symbol 'smp_receive_signal_client' was not declared. Should it be static? Add prototypes in kernel.h or asm/smp_64.h as appropriate. Delete duplicate function kimage_addr_to_ra(), and adapt parameter to const void * to match the broader use. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2012-03-28Disintegrate asm/system.h for SparcDavid Howells
Disintegrate asm/system.h for Sparc. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
2010-11-16sparc64: Delete prom_setcallback().David S. Miller
Unused. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-11-16sparc64: Unexport prom_service_exists().David S. Miller
Only used by functions in misc_64.c so make it private to that file. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-10-09of/sparc: convert various prom_* functions to use phandleAndres Salomon
Rather than passing around ints everywhere, use the phandle type where appropriate for the various functions that talk to the PROM. Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-08-23sparc64: Get rid of indirect p1275 PROM call buffer.David S. Miller
This is based upon a report by Meelis Roos showing that it's possible that we'll try to fetch a property that is 32K in size with some devices. With the current fixed 3K buffer we use for moving data in and out of the firmware during PROM calls, that simply won't work. In fact, it will scramble random kernel data during bootup. The reasoning behind the temporary buffer is entirely historical. It used to be the case that we had problems referencing dynamic kernel memory (including the stack) early in the boot process before we explicitly told the firwmare to switch us over to the kernel trap table. So what we did was always give the firmware buffers that were locked into the main kernel image. But we no longer have problems like that, so get rid of all of this indirect bounce buffering. Besides fixing Meelis's bug, this also makes the kernel data about 3K smaller. It was also discovered during these conversions that the implementation of prom_retain() was completely wrong, so that was fixed here as well. Currently that interface is not in use. Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Tested-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-09-04sparc64: Fix bootup with mcount in some configs.David S. Miller
Functions invoked early when booting up a cpu can't use tracing because mcount requires a valid 'current_thread_info()' and TLB mappings to be setup. The code path of sun4v_register_mondo_queues --> register_one_mondo is one such case. sun4v_register_mondo_queues already has the necessary 'notrace' annotation, but register_one_mondo does not. Normally register_one_mondo is inlined so the bug doesn't trigger, but with some config/compiler combinations, it won't be so we must properly mark it notrace. While we're here, add 'notrace' annoations to prom_printf and prom_halt so that early error handling won't have the same problem. Reported-by: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@gci.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-01-08sparc64: move EXPORT_SYMBOL to the symbols definitionSam Ravnborg
Move all applicable EXPORT_SYMBOL()s to the file where the respective symbol is defined. Removed all the includes that are no longer needed in sparc_ksyms_64.c Comment all remaining EXPORT_SYMBOL()s in sparc_ksyms_64.c Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Additions by Julian Calaby: * Moved EXPORT_SYMBOL()s for prom functions to their rightful places. * Made some minor cleanups to the includes and comments of sparc_ksyms_64.c * Updated and tidied commit message. * Rebased patch over sparc-2.6.git HEAD. * Ensured that all modified files have the correct includes. Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-12-04sparc,sparc64: unify prom/Sam Ravnborg
- all files with identical names copied and renamed to *_64.c - the remaning files copied as is - added sparc64 specific files to sparc/prom/Makefile - teach sparc64 Makefile to look into sparc/prom/ - delete unused Makefile from sparc64/prom/ linking order was not kept for sparc64 with this change. It was not possible to keep linking order for both sparc and sparc64 and as sparc64 see more testing than sparc it was natural to break linking order on sparc64. Should it have any effect it would be detected sooner this way. printf_32.c and printf_64.c are obvious candidates to be merged but they are not 100% equal so that was left for later Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>