| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Since the hip01 doesn't support cpu hotplug now, and doesn't implement
the hip01_cpu_die function, drop the declaration.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
|
|
These three structures are only defined and referenced in
mach-hisi/platsmp.c.
Drop the declarations from the header and add static qualifier
to the definitions.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
|
|
All ARMv5 and older CPUs invalidate their caches in the early assembly
setup function, prior to enabling the MMU. This is because the L1
cache should not contain any data relevant to the execution of the
kernel at this point; all data should have been flushed out to memory.
This requirement should also be true for ARMv6 and ARMv7 CPUs - indeed,
these typically do not search their caches when caching is disabled (as
it needs to be when the MMU is disabled) so this change should be safe.
ARMv7 allows there to be CPUs which search their caches while caching is
disabled, and it's permitted that the cache is uninitialised at boot;
for these, the architecture reference manual requires that an
implementation specific code sequence is used immediately after reset
to ensure that the cache is placed into a sane state. Such
functionality is definitely outside the remit of the Linux kernel, and
must be done by the SoC's firmware before _any_ CPU gets to the Linux
kernel.
Changing the data cache clean+invalidate to a mere invalidate allows us
to get rid of a lot of platform specific hacks around this issue for
their secondary CPU bringup paths - some of which were buggy.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Enable smp for HiP01 board.
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
[olof: split off the dts change to a separate commit]
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
As hix5hd2 and hip01 has the same secondary_startup
so rename hix5hd2_secondary_startup to
to hisi_secondary_startup.
the hip01 will use hisi_secondary_startup for the
secondary core boot.
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
Enable support for the Hisilicon HiX5HD2 SoC. This HiX5HD2 SoC series
support both single and dual Cortex-A9 cores.
Add ARCH_HIX5HD2 to distinguish HiX5HD2 from Hi3xxx.
They are different in implementation such as SMP, IPs integarted and
earlycon configure.
Signed-off-by: Haifeng Yan <yanhaifeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue <jchxue@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
Since some new Hisilicon SoCs are not named as hi3xxx, rename mach-hi3xxx
to mach-hisi instead. And the pronounciation of "hisi" is similar to the
chinese pronounciation of Hisilicon. So Hisilicon guys like this name.
ARCH_HI3xxx will be renamed later since other drivers are using it and
they are still in linux-next git tree. So rename ARCH_HI3xxx later.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
|
