| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The rename did the wrong thing for this documentation file all those
years ago. Fix that as well as the neglected rename of the platform
data structure.
Fixes: e7065e20d9a6 ("i2c: Rename last mux driver to standard pattern")
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
* Document the possibility to pass relative GPIO pin numbers.
* Document what platform device IDs to use, so that they do not
collide.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
|
|
Update the MAINTAINERS entry and all other references accordingly.
Based on an original patch by Wolfram Sang.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
[wsa: fixed merge conflict due to rework in i2c_add_mux_adapter()]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
|
|
Add an i2c mux driver providing access to i2c bus segments using a
hardware MUX sitting on a master bus and controlled through gpio pins.
E.G. something like:
---------- ---------- Bus segment 1 - - - - -
| | SCL/SDA | |-------------- | |
| |------------| |
| | | | Bus segment 2 | |
| Linux | GPIO 1..N | MUX |--------------- Devices
| |------------| | | |
| | | | Bus segment M
| | | |---------------| |
---------- ---------- - - - - -
SCL/SDA of the master I2C bus is multiplexed to bus segment 1..M
according to the settings of the GPIO pins 1..N.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
|
