| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
'interrupt-parent' is often documented as part of define bindings, but
it is really outside the scope of a device binding. It's never required
in a given node as it is often inherited from a parent node. Or it can
be implicit if a parent node is an 'interrupt-controller' node. So
remove it from all the binding files.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
|
|
HPLL is in fact not the clock we need. Remove prescription of which clock to
avoid further error. Please refer to your datasheet and double check like I
should have.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
We need a reference to the HPLL to calculate debounce cycles. If the
clocks property is not supplied in the GPIO node then the consumer
should deny any debounce requests.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
