| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
The default is enabled, and there should be no need to reconfigure
the status for SoC internal devices in the board specific files.
Only the USB PHY used needs to be configured in the board specific
files.
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe musb with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts data
with the following changes:
1. Swap the old ti,am33xx-usb compatible wrapper to generic ti-sysc
driver. This means later on we can also remove the old wrapper driver
drivers/usb/musb/musb_am335x.c
2. Update the child nodes to use the ranges provided by ti-sysc
3. Drop unneeded status = "enabled" tinkering for SoC internal devices.
This allows us to remove some useless board specific boilerplate code
in the following patches
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Ankur Tyagi <ankur.tyagi@gallagher.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Also on am335x we need the swsup quirks for musb.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
We need swsup quirks for sidle and mstandby for musb to work
properly.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
|
|
I noticed that when probed with ti-sysc, watchdog can trigger on am3, am4
and dra7 causing a device reset.
Turns out I made several mistakes implementing the watchdog quirk handling:
1. We must do both writes to spr register
2. We must also call the reset quirk on disable
3. On am3 and am4 we need to also set swsup quirk flag
I probably only tested this earlier with watchdog service running when the
watchdog never gets disabled.
Fixes: 4e23be473e30 ("bus: ti-sysc: Add support for module specific reset quirks")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Current implementation for ti-sysc powers down the module once module
init is complete. However, right after power is disabled, it is enabled
via runtime PM. This is unnecessary so avoid it by re-ordering the
events a bit; move powering down of the module post runtime PM enable
which makes sure the use counts are maintained properly and there is
no extra power down/up sequence for the module.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
There seems to be unnecessary extra hardreset line toggling applied
during module init. This is unnecessary, as the reset lines are already
asserted during boot, and it can cause certain modules to hang (iommus,
remoteprocs.) Remove the extra hardreset toggle, and remove the now
redundant function to handle this also.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
The main clocks and reset controls have a hardware level dependency,
where one can't transition state without the other one transitioning.
Because we don't have the dependency implemented in software, we must
ensure the ordering of these two is done properly; they way this is
handled is that clocks transition on software level without delay,
and the status is only polled on reset side. Because of this, we must
re-order the main clock and reset handling on the ti-sysc driver.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A bunch of fixes that accumulated in recent weeks, mostly material for
stable.
Summary:
- fix for regression from 5.3 that prevents to use balance convert
with single profile
- qgroup fixes: rescan race, accounting leak with multiple writers,
potential leak after io failure recovery
- fix for use after free in relocation (reported by KASAN)
- other error handling fixups"
* tag 'for-5.4-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls
btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space
btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile
btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots
Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers
Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started
btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer
Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes
|
|
Pull csky updates from Guo Ren:
"This round of csky subsystem just some fixups:
- Fix mb() synchronization problem
- Fix dma_alloc_coherent with PAGE_SO attribute
- Fix cache_op failed when cross memory ZONEs
- Optimize arch_sync_dma_for_cpu/device with dma_inv_range
- Fix ioremap function losing
- Fix arch_get_unmapped_area() implementation
- Fix defer cache flush for 610
- Support kernel non-aligned access
- Fix 610 vipt cache flush mechanism
- Fix add zero_fp fixup perf backtrace panic
- Move static keyword to the front of declaration
- Fix csky_pmu.max_period assignment
- Use generic free_initrd_mem()
- entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop"
* tag 'csky-for-linus-5.4-rc1' of git://github.com/c-sky/csky-linux:
csky: Move static keyword to the front of declaration
csky: entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop
csky: Fixup csky_pmu.max_period assignment
csky: Fixup add zero_fp fixup perf backtrace panic
csky: Use generic free_initrd_mem()
csky: Fixup 610 vipt cache flush mechanism
csky: Support kernel non-aligned access
csky: Fixup defer cache flush for 610
csky: Fixup arch_get_unmapped_area() implementation
csky: Fixup ioremap function losing
csky: Optimize arch_sync_dma_for_cpu/device with dma_inv_range
csky/dma: Fixup cache_op failed when cross memory ZONEs
csky: Fixup dma_alloc_coherent with PAGE_SO attribute
csky: Fixup mb() synchronization problem
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc
Pull ARM SoC fixes from Olof Johansson:
"A few fixes that have trickled in through the merge window:
- Video fixes for OMAP due to panel-dpi driver removal
- Clock fixes for OMAP that broke no-idle quirks + nfsroot on DRA7
- Fixing arch version on ASpeed ast2500
- Two fixes for reset handling on ARM SCMI"
* tag 'armsoc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc:
ARM: aspeed: ast2500 is ARMv6K
reset: reset-scmi: add missing handle initialisation
firmware: arm_scmi: reset: fix reset_state assignment in scmi_domain_reset
bus: ti-sysc: Remove unpaired sysc_clkdm_deny_idle()
ARM: dts: logicpd-som-lv: Fix i2c2 and i2c3 Pin mux
ARM: dts: am3517-evm: Fix missing video
ARM: dts: logicpd-torpedo-baseboard: Fix missing video
ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Fix missing video
bus: ti-sysc: Fix handling of invalid clocks
bus: ti-sysc: Fix clock handling for no-idle quirks
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace
Pull tracing fixes from Steven Rostedt:
"A few more tracing fixes:
- Fix a buffer overflow by checking nr_args correctly in probes
- Fix a warning that is reported by clang
- Fix a possible memory leak in error path of filter processing
- Fix the selftest that checks for failures, but wasn't failing
- Minor clean up on call site output of a memory trace event"
* tag 'trace-v5.4-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace:
selftests/ftrace: Fix same probe error test
mm, tracing: Print symbol name for call_site in trace events
tracing: Have error path in predicate_parse() free its allocated memory
tracing: Fix clang -Wint-in-bool-context warnings in IF_ASSIGN macro
tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
|
|
Pull more MMC updates from Ulf Hansson:
"A couple more updates/fixes for MMC:
- sdhci-pci: Add Genesys Logic GL975x support
- sdhci-tegra: Recover loss in throughput for DMA
- sdhci-of-esdhc: Fix DMA bug"
* tag 'mmc-v5.4-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc:
mmc: host: sdhci-pci: Add Genesys Logic GL975x support
mmc: tegra: Implement ->set_dma_mask()
mmc: sdhci: Let drivers define their DMA mask
mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set DMA snooping based on DMA coherence
mmc: sdhci: improve ADMA error reporting
|
|
Move the static keyword to the front of declaration of
csky_pmu_of_device_ids, and resolve the following compiler
warning that can be seen when building with warnings
enabled (W=1):
arch/csky/kernel/perf_event.c:1340:1: warning:
‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
|
|
Since the enabling and disabling of IRQs within preempt_schedule_irq()
is contained in a need_resched() loop, we don't need the outer arch
code loop.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
Pull Documentation/process update from Greg KH:
"Here are two small Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
file updates that missed my previous char/misc pull request.
The first one adds an Intel representative for the process, and the
second one cleans up the text a bit more when it comes to how the
disclosure rules work, as it was a bit confusing to some companies"
* tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc:
Documentation/process: Clarify disclosure rules
Documentation/process: Volunteer as the ambassador for Intel
|
