diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 523 |
1 files changed, 523 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..79de954626fd --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c @@ -0,0 +1,523 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds + * + * Pentium III FXSR, SSE support + * General FPU state handling cleanups + * Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>, May 2000 + */ +#include <asm/fpu/internal.h> +#include <asm/fpu/regset.h> +#include <asm/fpu/signal.h> +#include <asm/traps.h> + +#include <linux/hardirq.h> + +/* + * Represents the initial FPU state. It's mostly (but not completely) zeroes, + * depending on the FPU hardware format: + */ +union fpregs_state init_fpstate __read_mostly; + +/* + * Track whether the kernel is using the FPU state + * currently. + * + * This flag is used: + * + * - by IRQ context code to potentially use the FPU + * if it's unused. + * + * - to debug kernel_fpu_begin()/end() correctness + */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, in_kernel_fpu); + +/* + * Track which context is using the FPU on the CPU: + */ +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpu *, fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx); + +static void kernel_fpu_disable(void) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(this_cpu_read(in_kernel_fpu)); + this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, true); +} + +static void kernel_fpu_enable(void) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(!this_cpu_read(in_kernel_fpu)); + this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, false); +} + +static bool kernel_fpu_disabled(void) +{ + return this_cpu_read(in_kernel_fpu); +} + +/* + * Were we in an interrupt that interrupted kernel mode? + * + * On others, we can do a kernel_fpu_begin/end() pair *ONLY* if that + * pair does nothing at all: the thread must not have fpu (so + * that we don't try to save the FPU state), and TS must + * be set (so that the clts/stts pair does nothing that is + * visible in the interrupted kernel thread). + * + * Except for the eagerfpu case when we return true; in the likely case + * the thread has FPU but we are not going to set/clear TS. + */ +static bool interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(void) +{ + if (kernel_fpu_disabled()) + return false; + + if (use_eager_fpu()) + return true; + + return !current->thread.fpu.fpregs_active && (read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS); +} + +/* + * Were we in user mode (or vm86 mode) when we were + * interrupted? + * + * Doing kernel_fpu_begin/end() is ok if we are running + * in an interrupt context from user mode - we'll just + * save the FPU state as required. + */ +static bool interrupted_user_mode(void) +{ + struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); + return regs && user_mode(regs); +} + +/* + * Can we use the FPU in kernel mode with the + * whole "kernel_fpu_begin/end()" sequence? + * + * It's always ok in process context (ie "not interrupt") + * but it is sometimes ok even from an irq. + */ +bool irq_fpu_usable(void) +{ + return !in_interrupt() || + interrupted_user_mode() || + interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_fpu_usable); + +void __kernel_fpu_begin(void) +{ + struct fpu *fpu = ¤t->thread.fpu; + + WARN_ON_FPU(!irq_fpu_usable()); + + kernel_fpu_disable(); + + if (fpu->fpregs_active) { + copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(fpu); + } else { + this_cpu_write(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, NULL); + __fpregs_activate_hw(); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_begin); + +void __kernel_fpu_end(void) +{ + struct fpu *fpu = ¤t->thread.fpu; + + if (fpu->fpregs_active) + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state); + else + __fpregs_deactivate_hw(); + + kernel_fpu_enable(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_end); + +void kernel_fpu_begin(void) +{ + preempt_disable(); + __kernel_fpu_begin(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_fpu_begin); + +void kernel_fpu_end(void) +{ + __kernel_fpu_end(); + preempt_enable(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_fpu_end); + +/* + * CR0::TS save/restore functions: + */ +int irq_ts_save(void) +{ + /* + * If in process context and not atomic, we can take a spurious DNA fault. + * Otherwise, doing clts() in process context requires disabling preemption + * or some heavy lifting like kernel_fpu_begin() + */ + if (!in_atomic()) + return 0; + + if (read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS) { + clts(); + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_ts_save); + +void irq_ts_restore(int TS_state) +{ + if (TS_state) + stts(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_ts_restore); + +/* + * Save the FPU state (mark it for reload if necessary): + * + * This only ever gets called for the current task. + */ +void fpu__save(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu); + + preempt_disable(); + if (fpu->fpregs_active) { + if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(fpu)) + fpregs_deactivate(fpu); + } + preempt_enable(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpu__save); + +/* + * Legacy x87 fpstate state init: + */ +static inline void fpstate_init_fstate(struct fregs_state *fp) +{ + fp->cwd = 0xffff037fu; + fp->swd = 0xffff0000u; + fp->twd = 0xffffffffu; + fp->fos = 0xffff0000u; +} + +void fpstate_init(union fpregs_state *state) +{ + if (!cpu_has_fpu) { + fpstate_init_soft(&state->soft); + return; + } + + memset(state, 0, xstate_size); + + if (cpu_has_fxsr) + fpstate_init_fxstate(&state->fxsave); + else + fpstate_init_fstate(&state->fsave); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpstate_init); + +/* + * Copy the current task's FPU state to a new task's FPU context. + * + * In both the 'eager' and the 'lazy' case we save hardware registers + * directly to the destination buffer. + */ +static void fpu_copy(struct fpu *dst_fpu, struct fpu *src_fpu) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(src_fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu); + + /* + * Don't let 'init optimized' areas of the XSAVE area + * leak into the child task: + */ + if (use_eager_fpu()) + memset(&dst_fpu->state.xsave, 0, xstate_size); + + /* + * Save current FPU registers directly into the child + * FPU context, without any memory-to-memory copying. + * + * If the FPU context got destroyed in the process (FNSAVE + * done on old CPUs) then copy it back into the source + * context and mark the current task for lazy restore. + * + * We have to do all this with preemption disabled, + * mostly because of the FNSAVE case, because in that + * case we must not allow preemption in the window + * between the FNSAVE and us marking the context lazy. + * + * It shouldn't be an issue as even FNSAVE is plenty + * fast in terms of critical section length. + */ + preempt_disable(); + if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(dst_fpu)) { + memcpy(&src_fpu->state, &dst_fpu->state, xstate_size); + fpregs_deactivate(src_fpu); + } + preempt_enable(); +} + +int fpu__copy(struct fpu *dst_fpu, struct fpu *src_fpu) +{ + dst_fpu->counter = 0; + dst_fpu->fpregs_active = 0; + dst_fpu->last_cpu = -1; + + if (src_fpu->fpstate_active) + fpu_copy(dst_fpu, src_fpu); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Activate the current task's in-memory FPU context, + * if it has not been used before: + */ +void fpu__activate_curr(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu); + + if (!fpu->fpstate_active) { + fpstate_init(&fpu->state); + + /* Safe to do for the current task: */ + fpu->fpstate_active = 1; + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpu__activate_curr); + +/* + * This function must be called before we read a task's fpstate. + * + * If the task has not used the FPU before then initialize its + * fpstate. + * + * If the task has used the FPU before then save it. + */ +void fpu__activate_fpstate_read(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + /* + * If fpregs are active (in the current CPU), then + * copy them to the fpstate: + */ + if (fpu->fpregs_active) { + fpu__save(fpu); + } else { + if (!fpu->fpstate_active) { + fpstate_init(&fpu->state); + + /* Safe to do for current and for stopped child tasks: */ + fpu->fpstate_active = 1; + } + } +} + +/* + * This function must be called before we write a task's fpstate. + * + * If the task has used the FPU before then unlazy it. + * If the task has not used the FPU before then initialize its fpstate. + * + * After this function call, after registers in the fpstate are + * modified and the child task has woken up, the child task will + * restore the modified FPU state from the modified context. If we + * didn't clear its lazy status here then the lazy in-registers + * state pending on its former CPU could be restored, corrupting + * the modifications. + */ +void fpu__activate_fpstate_write(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + /* + * Only stopped child tasks can be used to modify the FPU + * state in the fpstate buffer: + */ + WARN_ON_FPU(fpu == ¤t->thread.fpu); + + if (fpu->fpstate_active) { + /* Invalidate any lazy state: */ + fpu->last_cpu = -1; + } else { + fpstate_init(&fpu->state); + + /* Safe to do for stopped child tasks: */ + fpu->fpstate_active = 1; + } +} + +/* + * 'fpu__restore()' is called to copy FPU registers from + * the FPU fpstate to the live hw registers and to activate + * access to the hardware registers, so that FPU instructions + * can be used afterwards. + * + * Must be called with kernel preemption disabled (for example + * with local interrupts disabled, as it is in the case of + * do_device_not_available()). + */ +void fpu__restore(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + fpu__activate_curr(fpu); + + /* Avoid __kernel_fpu_begin() right after fpregs_activate() */ + kernel_fpu_disable(); + fpregs_activate(fpu); + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state); + fpu->counter++; + kernel_fpu_enable(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpu__restore); + +/* + * Drops current FPU state: deactivates the fpregs and + * the fpstate. NOTE: it still leaves previous contents + * in the fpregs in the eager-FPU case. + * + * This function can be used in cases where we know that + * a state-restore is coming: either an explicit one, + * or a reschedule. + */ +void fpu__drop(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + preempt_disable(); + fpu->counter = 0; + + if (fpu->fpregs_active) { + /* Ignore delayed exceptions from user space */ + asm volatile("1: fwait\n" + "2:\n" + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)); + fpregs_deactivate(fpu); + } + + fpu->fpstate_active = 0; + + preempt_enable(); +} + +/* + * Clear FPU registers by setting them up from + * the init fpstate: + */ +static inline void copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(void) +{ + if (use_xsave()) + copy_kernel_to_xregs(&init_fpstate.xsave, -1); + else + copy_kernel_to_fxregs(&init_fpstate.fxsave); +} + +/* + * Clear the FPU state back to init state. + * + * Called by sys_execve(), by the signal handler code and by various + * error paths. + */ +void fpu__clear(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu); /* Almost certainly an anomaly */ + + if (!use_eager_fpu()) { + /* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */ + fpu__drop(fpu); + } else { + if (!fpu->fpstate_active) { + fpu__activate_curr(fpu); + user_fpu_begin(); + } + copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(); + } +} + +/* + * x87 math exception handling: + */ + +static inline unsigned short get_fpu_cwd(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + if (cpu_has_fxsr) { + return fpu->state.fxsave.cwd; + } else { + return (unsigned short)fpu->state.fsave.cwd; + } +} + +static inline unsigned short get_fpu_swd(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + if (cpu_has_fxsr) { + return fpu->state.fxsave.swd; + } else { + return (unsigned short)fpu->state.fsave.swd; + } +} + +static inline unsigned short get_fpu_mxcsr(struct fpu *fpu) +{ + if (cpu_has_xmm) { + return fpu->state.fxsave.mxcsr; + } else { + return MXCSR_DEFAULT; + } +} + +int fpu__exception_code(struct fpu *fpu, int trap_nr) +{ + int err; + + if (trap_nr == X86_TRAP_MF) { + unsigned short cwd, swd; + /* + * (~cwd & swd) will mask out exceptions that are not set to unmasked + * status. 0x3f is the exception bits in these regs, 0x200 is the + * C1 reg you need in case of a stack fault, 0x040 is the stack + * fault bit. We should only be taking one exception at a time, + * so if this combination doesn't produce any single exception, + * then we have a bad program that isn't synchronizing its FPU usage + * and it will suffer the consequences since we won't be able to + * fully reproduce the context of the exception + */ + cwd = get_fpu_cwd(fpu); + swd = get_fpu_swd(fpu); + + err = swd & ~cwd; + } else { + /* + * The SIMD FPU exceptions are handled a little differently, as there + * is only a single status/control register. Thus, to determine which + * unmasked exception was caught we must mask the exception mask bits + * at 0x1f80, and then use these to mask the exception bits at 0x3f. + */ + unsigned short mxcsr = get_fpu_mxcsr(fpu); + err = ~(mxcsr >> 7) & mxcsr; + } + + if (err & 0x001) { /* Invalid op */ + /* + * swd & 0x240 == 0x040: Stack Underflow + * swd & 0x240 == 0x240: Stack Overflow + * User must clear the SF bit (0x40) if set + */ + return FPE_FLTINV; + } else if (err & 0x004) { /* Divide by Zero */ + return FPE_FLTDIV; + } else if (err & 0x008) { /* Overflow */ + return FPE_FLTOVF; + } else if (err & 0x012) { /* Denormal, Underflow */ + return FPE_FLTUND; + } else if (err & 0x020) { /* Precision */ + return FPE_FLTRES; + } + + /* + * If we're using IRQ 13, or supposedly even some trap + * X86_TRAP_MF implementations, it's possible + * we get a spurious trap, which is not an error. + */ + return 0; +} |