diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2021-07-09 15:22:45 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2021-07-09 15:22:45 -0700 |
commit | 5d52c906f059b9ee11747557aaaf1fd85a3b6c3d (patch) | |
tree | 6d8a1f863940a1cc6dbb6e7e9968cfa956c9abbb /tools/testing | |
parent | 67a9c94317402b826fc3db32afc8f39336803d97 (diff) | |
parent | 1fb5ba29ad0835c5cbfc69a27f9c2733cb65726e (diff) |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2021-07-09
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 9 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain
a total of 13 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix runqslower task->state access from BPF, from SanjayKumar Jeyakumar.
2) Fix subprog poke descriptor tracking use-after-free, from John Fastabend.
3) Fix sparse complaint from prior devmap RCU conversion, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.
4) Fix missing va_end in bpftool JIT json dump's error path, from Gu Shengxian.
5) Fix tools/bpf install target from missing runqslower install, from Wei Li.
6) Fix xdpsock BPF sample to unload program on shared umem option, from Wang Hai.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 18 |
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c index ee27d68d2a1c..b5940e6ca67c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ out: bpf_object__close(obj); } +#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf4.skel.h" + /* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 checks that tailcall counter is correctly preserved * across tailcalls combined with bpf2bpf calls. for making sure that tailcall * counter behaves correctly, bpf program will go through following flow: @@ -727,10 +729,15 @@ out: * the loop begins. At the end of the test make sure that the global counter is * equal to 31, because tailcall counter includes the first two tailcalls * whereas global counter is incremented only on loop presented on flow above. + * + * The noise parameter is used to insert bpf_map_update calls into the logic + * to force verifier to patch instructions. This allows us to ensure jump + * logic remains correct with instruction movement. */ -static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) +static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise) { - int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val; + int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i; + struct tailcall_bpf2bpf4__bss val; struct bpf_map *prog_array, *data_map; struct bpf_program *prog; struct bpf_object *obj; @@ -774,11 +781,6 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) goto out; } - err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0, - &duration, &retval, NULL); - CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", - err, errno, retval); - data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) return; @@ -788,9 +790,21 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) return; i = 0; + val.noise = noise; + val.count = 0; + err = bpf_map_update_elem(data_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY); + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) + goto out; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0, + &duration, &retval, NULL); + CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", + err, errno, retval); + + i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); - CHECK(err || val != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n", - err, errno, val); + CHECK(err || val.count != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n", + err, errno, val.count); out: bpf_object__close(obj); @@ -815,5 +829,7 @@ void test_tailcalls(void) if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_3")) test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(); if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_4")) - test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(); + test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false); + if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5")) + test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c index 77df6d4db895..e89368a50b97 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c @@ -3,6 +3,13 @@ #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); +} nop_table SEC(".maps"); + +struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 3); __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); @@ -10,10 +17,21 @@ struct { } jmp_table SEC(".maps"); int count = 0; +int noise = 0; + +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void) +{ + __u32 key = 0; + + bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key); + return 0; +} __noinline int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { + if (noise) + subprog_noise(); bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2); return skb->len * 3; } |