summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-07-09 15:22:45 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-07-09 15:22:45 -0700
commit5d52c906f059b9ee11747557aaaf1fd85a3b6c3d (patch)
tree6d8a1f863940a1cc6dbb6e7e9968cfa956c9abbb /tools/testing
parent67a9c94317402b826fc3db32afc8f39336803d97 (diff)
parent1fb5ba29ad0835c5cbfc69a27f9c2733cb65726e (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf 2021-07-09 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. We've added 9 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain a total of 13 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Fix runqslower task->state access from BPF, from SanjayKumar Jeyakumar. 2) Fix subprog poke descriptor tracking use-after-free, from John Fastabend. 3) Fix sparse complaint from prior devmap RCU conversion, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen. 4) Fix missing va_end in bpftool JIT json dump's error path, from Gu Shengxian. 5) Fix tools/bpf install target from missing runqslower install, from Wei Li. 6) Fix xdpsock BPF sample to unload program on shared umem option, from Wang Hai. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c36
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c18
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index ee27d68d2a1c..b5940e6ca67c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ out:
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf4.skel.h"
+
/* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 checks that tailcall counter is correctly preserved
* across tailcalls combined with bpf2bpf calls. for making sure that tailcall
* counter behaves correctly, bpf program will go through following flow:
@@ -727,10 +729,15 @@ out:
* the loop begins. At the end of the test make sure that the global counter is
* equal to 31, because tailcall counter includes the first two tailcalls
* whereas global counter is incremented only on loop presented on flow above.
+ *
+ * The noise parameter is used to insert bpf_map_update calls into the logic
+ * to force verifier to patch instructions. This allows us to ensure jump
+ * logic remains correct with instruction movement.
*/
-static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise)
{
- int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val;
+ int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i;
+ struct tailcall_bpf2bpf4__bss val;
struct bpf_map *prog_array, *data_map;
struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -774,11 +781,6 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
goto out;
}
- err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
- &duration, &retval, NULL);
- CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
- err, errno, retval);
-
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss");
if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map)))
return;
@@ -788,9 +790,21 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
return;
i = 0;
+ val.noise = noise;
+ val.count = 0;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(data_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY);
+ if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+ &duration, &retval, NULL);
+ CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+ err, errno, retval);
+
+ i = 0;
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val);
- CHECK(err || val != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
- err, errno, val);
+ CHECK(err || val.count != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
+ err, errno, val.count);
out:
bpf_object__close(obj);
@@ -815,5 +829,7 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_3"))
test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3();
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_4"))
- test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4();
+ test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5"))
+ test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
index 77df6d4db895..e89368a50b97 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
@@ -3,6 +3,13 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} nop_table SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 3);
__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
@@ -10,10 +17,21 @@ struct {
} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
int count = 0;
+int noise = 0;
+
+__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)
+{
+ __u32 key = 0;
+
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
+ return 0;
+}
__noinline
int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
+ if (noise)
+ subprog_noise();
bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
return skb->len * 3;
}