summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorErico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com>2019-05-21 00:42:29 +0200
committerQiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>2019-05-21 20:47:36 +0800
commit47ab14578263571228ce63e9417d96847693c7b4 (patch)
treea38bf78aac55ec7e8438e5b3e0696680910d01c0 /drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
parent3c6b8625dde82600fd03ad1fcba223f1303ee535 (diff)
drm/lima: add timeout to drm scheduler init
After "5918045c4ed4 drm/scheduler: rework job destruction", lima started to leak memory due to buffers not being destroyed after job execution in the drm scheduler. This started happening because the drm scheduler only destroyed buffers after cancelling the job timeout handler, and for lima this handler was never started as lima specified a MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT timeout. Lima seems to run well in its current state with a real timeout, so to make it more aligned with the other drivers from now on, let's use a real default timeout. This also fixes the observed memory leaks. The 500ms value was chosen as it is the current value for all other embedded gpu drivers using drm sched. Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190520224229.21111-1-nunes.erico@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c11
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
index 58a15479d175..4127cacac454 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
@@ -329,19 +329,16 @@ static void lima_sched_error_work(struct work_struct *work)
int lima_sched_pipe_init(struct lima_sched_pipe *pipe, const char *name)
{
- long timeout;
-
- if (lima_sched_timeout_ms <= 0)
- timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
- else
- timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(lima_sched_timeout_ms);
+ unsigned int timeout = lima_sched_timeout_ms > 0 ?
+ lima_sched_timeout_ms : 500;
pipe->fence_context = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
spin_lock_init(&pipe->fence_lock);
INIT_WORK(&pipe->error_work, lima_sched_error_work);
- return drm_sched_init(&pipe->base, &lima_sched_ops, 1, 0, timeout, name);
+ return drm_sched_init(&pipe->base, &lima_sched_ops, 1, 0,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(timeout), name);
}
void lima_sched_pipe_fini(struct lima_sched_pipe *pipe)