summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/hexagon/include/asm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>2018-07-22 16:03:58 -0700
committerRichard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>2018-09-10 19:42:15 -0500
commit5c41aaad409c097cf1ef74f2c649fed994744ef5 (patch)
tree0909717180f25a262f81ab138ab3501fff172ad1 /arch/hexagon/include/asm
parent200f351e27f014fcbf69b544b0b4b72aeaf45fd3 (diff)
hexagon: modify ffs() and fls() to return int
Building drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c on arch/hexagon/ produces a printk format build warning. This is due to hexagon's ffs() being coded as returning long instead of int. Fix the printk format warning by changing all of hexagon's ffs() and fls() functions to return int instead of long. The variables that they return are already int instead of long. This return type matches the return type in <asm-generic/bitops/>. ../drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c: In function 'init_nandsim': ../drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c:760:2: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long int' [-Wformat] There are no ffs() or fls() allmodconfig build errors after making this change. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Patch-mainline: linux-kernel @ 07/22/2018, 16:03 Signed-off-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/hexagon/include/asm')
-rw-r--r--arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h
index 5e4a59b3ec1b..2691a1857d20 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static inline long ffz(int x)
* This is defined the same way as ffs.
* Note fls(0) = 0, fls(1) = 1, fls(0x80000000) = 32.
*/
-static inline long fls(int x)
+static inline int fls(int x)
{
int r;
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static inline long fls(int x)
* the libc and compiler builtin ffs routines, therefore
* differs in spirit from the above ffz (man ffs).
*/
-static inline long ffs(int x)
+static inline int ffs(int x)
{
int r;