diff options
| author | Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> | 2013-03-25 11:19:35 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2013-04-08 09:16:55 +0200 |
| commit | a13fbe549fded5b77e020d4e08f1f74e212cc543 (patch) | |
| tree | 13a549e4be020dd4d782b840f8c87bc5c945cc51 | |
| parent | 78e443e4c66b6e9391252f0080a06831259ada3a (diff) | |
mac80211: be more careful about sending beacon-loss-events
I don't think we should send the events unless it was actually
a beacon that was lost...not just any probe of an AP.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/mac80211/mlme.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c index 237e2ef42ba9..e12fedcfa988 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c @@ -1988,13 +1988,15 @@ static void ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, goto out; } - if (beacon) + if (beacon) { mlme_dbg_ratelimited(sdata, "detected beacon loss from AP (missed %d beacons) - probing\n", beacon_loss_count); - ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(&sdata->vif, - NL80211_CQM_RSSI_BEACON_LOSS_EVENT, GFP_KERNEL); + ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(&sdata->vif, + NL80211_CQM_RSSI_BEACON_LOSS_EVENT, + GFP_KERNEL); + } /* * The driver/our work has already reported this event or the |