diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-03-23 19:07:49 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-04-18 15:44:55 -0500 |
commit | 1223f3db71ba7bbcf2e77c7a5d4f440c2a2fa9c3 (patch) | |
tree | e900a56c4779878e7d2adf31d8b52f0205274d45 | |
parent | 307ed94c37f842676d336cf5f2162022f4d7cdc4 (diff) |
platform_data: wilco-ec.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h b/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h index 25f46a939637..3e268e636b5b 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/wilco-ec.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct wilco_ec_response { u16 result; u16 data_size; u8 reserved[2]; - u8 data[0]; + u8 data[]; } __packed; /** |